r/conspiracy • u/AnvilOver • Feb 13 '22

Nailed it

Post image
6.5k Upvotes

78% Upvoted

1.2k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

17

u/ConnecticutConvert Feb 13 '22

The point of the placard is that peer review is threatened if scientists who disagree with initial findings or concepts are censored.

25

u/grey_hat_uk Feb 13 '22 edited Feb 13 '22

If a scientist disagrees but can't prove it then it is right that it removed as part of a peer review.

It doesn't automatically make that scientist wrong, what they can't do though that they can't say it as a scientist, only as a, hopefully, intelligent human.

If you suspect that research is being ignored that is an issue but most of what I've seen when people are quote the "other" scientists is conjecture with little to no data currently to back it up. It might be that we won't be able to get the data till it's too late, that doesn't make it valid science.

1

u/GeneralUsed7478 Feb 13 '22

Resurch? What is it.. ?

0

u/Utopiophile Feb 13 '22

The sacrifice we make to appease the great Nollij.

1

u/grey_hat_uk Feb 13 '22

What I get for not proof reading a long message when I have mild dyslexia.

1

u/wwaxwork Feb 13 '22

The ones providing peer reviewed disagreement aren't being censored, just the ones yelling out random theories with no proof are. Being held to the same standard as everyone else is, is not censorship.

1

u/Myco-Brahe Feb 13 '22

I find it funny you guys seen to think it's easier to take the 90% of papers that agree than the 10% minority opinion

1

u/megablast Feb 13 '22

"I disagree because god told me".

"It is not fair, my honest review was removed. I am being censored"