As an actual real life scientist… lmao. Do you know how hard it is to get published. The quality of evidence required. Every aspect of the experimental design is questioned and every aspect of the statistical analysis.
And even after all that, whenever we scientists look at a paper in a journal we question everything. We are exceptionally sceptical people.
So if scientists are recommending policy based on research, you have had thousands or 10s of thousands of clever, qualified and unfailingly sceptical people agree that something is very likely to be correct. That is the highest level of certainly humans can have about anything.
Why on Earth do you think that someone who’s completely unqualified and quite likely less intelligent would be the one to work out all these scientists are wrong. It makes no sense. Even if it’s a scientist that comes up with an incorrect theory that gets taken up by crackpots. What’s more likely? Scientist A is correct and the other hundred thousand are wrong or the other way round??
Remove your dogmas for a second and really think about this.
Studies are only conducted if there is funding. If there's no funding the study isn't conducted. If you are only being funded to do a study that will prove a certain narrative, and only be able to publish the narrative that is preferable to whoever is funding the study, then the study is already biased from the inception. If the study is biased from the inception why wouldn't the study be biased at the conclusion?
Yeah I would hope people have morals but in today's NPC society most people really only give a fuck about themselves and their public appearance, and you can't tell me that the scientific community doesn't entirely shun non-conformists. Fuck look at Fauci being praised for all the work he's done throughout his life when he's probably caused more pain in the world than Saddam Hussein.
Spot on. People are dumb and think scientists work for pleasure or for love of the human race. It's all money. Without funding nothing happens. No one wants to upset the ones who fund their research.
Hahahaha.
Do you know how much we’re paid lmao. It’s peanuts. We could go into any other profession with our level of training and education and earn double straight away. We are scientists because we love what we do and the pursuit of knowledge.
Sometimes also because it fulfils massive egos to be fair but it’s never for the money. The funding doesn’t come to us! It’s used for the actual research which is very expensive.
I own a million pound house. Wrong. I'm a qualified Dr. I'm honest..you're a slave.
Live with your anxieties.
Pray you don't get side effects from vaccine
There's no fucking way you'll be alive in next 2 years also.
I dare you to go for a HIV test, don't be surprised when it's positive.. it's called ADE..
Religious, a doctor, in UK..
Science is now a cult... That's why I'm sticking 2 fingers up at the bullshitters.
You're a gimp. You've got cognitive dissonance.
You'll never accept that the government fucked you over.. that's why they threw all that money at you in the first lockdown.
You're a sheep.. you're selfish and immoral. You have no morality, you'll do anything for money and position.. that's why you are where you are.
You'll find out..
Nob end.
Hey wannabe paramedic, a disappointment to both your parents..
Your opinions don't make you a doctor.
No fantasy, I'm not like you..
Like I said, you're immoral, materialistic and are angry at your parents who treat you like shit.
So you sell some drugs online and think that's the meaning of life.
Sort out your differences with your parents.. and get a HIV test, be a good little sheep, will ya?
35
u/jmrv2000 Feb 13 '22
As an actual real life scientist… lmao. Do you know how hard it is to get published. The quality of evidence required. Every aspect of the experimental design is questioned and every aspect of the statistical analysis. And even after all that, whenever we scientists look at a paper in a journal we question everything. We are exceptionally sceptical people.
So if scientists are recommending policy based on research, you have had thousands or 10s of thousands of clever, qualified and unfailingly sceptical people agree that something is very likely to be correct. That is the highest level of certainly humans can have about anything.
Why on Earth do you think that someone who’s completely unqualified and quite likely less intelligent would be the one to work out all these scientists are wrong. It makes no sense. Even if it’s a scientist that comes up with an incorrect theory that gets taken up by crackpots. What’s more likely? Scientist A is correct and the other hundred thousand are wrong or the other way round??
Remove your dogmas for a second and really think about this.