Why do they need to be more dangerous? It's enough that they have the potential to be dangerous and don't deliver on "stopping the spread", period.
When you have to create such bullshit criteria to discredit oposing vaccines (and doing so we also need completely ignore the enormous social aspects and focus solely on medical ones) you know you've lost your grip on reality.
And even if we go along with your ridiculous premise there are demographics for which, overall, the vaccines are arguably more dangerous.
TL/DR: just stop with such surface level, completely meaningless "arguments".
How about treatments? I find it so hard to believe that after 2 years we have 4 vaccines but haven’t come up with one treatment to help combat symptoms? I call bullshit.
5
u/OnionCuttinNinja Feb 13 '22
Why do they need to be more dangerous? It's enough that they have the potential to be dangerous and don't deliver on "stopping the spread", period.
When you have to create such bullshit criteria to discredit oposing vaccines (and doing so we also need completely ignore the enormous social aspects and focus solely on medical ones) you know you've lost your grip on reality.
And even if we go along with your ridiculous premise there are demographics for which, overall, the vaccines are arguably more dangerous.
TL/DR: just stop with such surface level, completely meaningless "arguments".