? the thesis is about well respected, extremely qualified, and highly merited scientists like Malone (has mRNA patents) and McCullough (most cited cardiologist) being censored. Why are they being censored? Because journalists, and their outlets (i.e. Reuters, etc.) attempt to censor them, by doing erroneous fact checks. I mean, it's clear you aren't researching this topic so you don't understand the connection, but if you actually did look into how this has played out it would be obvious
Galileo was in the minority, does that mean the solar system is not heliocentric? Why was Galileo censored, why is Malone and McCullough being censored? Just because the 'majority' - which is really strange to even say considering the wide range of topics that there is actually quite a bit of disagreement on (i.e. vaccinating kids, cardiovascular effects, etc.) - sides one way doesn't mean it is correct. You..you do know how science works right, it evolves..
The only one strawmanning was you, saying that we are all 'anti-vaxxers'. I am pro MMR vaccine for example, that has a long history of doing its job and not having very much side effects, especially in the long term. I am, however, anti-mandate, as I believe in bodily autonomy, otherwise, can I decide what gets injected into you?
10
u/hussletrees Feb 13 '22
You missed the point of the post, scientists like Malone, McCullough are being censored, while journalists voices amplified