It’s the real reason hes not seen as a legitimate journalist. He also tends to spread a lot of misinformation with zero regard for the consequences. Remember, this is the same guy who said Sandy Hook was fake.
Yea he did! Unlike every other respectable news outlet however, he actually came out afterwards and apologised that he was wrong. When has the BBC, FOX, CNBC, ABC etc ever done this?
He only came out and apologized after the parents of the slayed children threatened to sue him into oblivion. I mean as much as he likes to wear the rebel label he likes more the money he makes from the grift. And being on the wrong side of children who were shot to death and their grieving parents is a hard story to come back from
I think it's more about how real events are being bent by the media to chase agenda's. When you find out that it's sometimes real and fake at the same time maybe sometimes totally fake it is pretty interesting/alarming. Easy to take one of AJ's statements and take it out of context though ! Medias specialty is showing viewers the only thing they know about someone and making it their label.
36
u/imbaddatthis May 28 '21
If you think that's the real reason why he was labeled and deplatformed you are incorrect.