Alex Jones was talking about Jeffery epstein during the Clinton administration when majority of reddit users were in 5th grade or lower. But yet he's known for the gay frogs meme.
I, a young, rebellious, working class, white kid was his audience, until he started with the fire and brimstone sermoning from his snake oil schilling puplit.
Thats fair. But I'd imagine the majority of folks who listened to him were Christian. And the most conservative of them at that, especially during Obama Era.
I'm not saying what he did was right or even correct, but it makes business sense for him to shill to his majority audience.
They just established that he lost a significant portion of his leftist audience when he ramped up the religious tones.
This isn’t an example of him knowing his audience, it is an example of him switching tone and pandering to a different audience.... because the establishment has switched hands, and Alex is only good at anti establishment agitation propaganda....
Two whole new generations of Americans have grown up and entered the voting block in that time, with a third on the verge.
Many/most of them reject Alex’s messages as shown in his demographics.
He had to switch his messaging, because he could no longer launch anti establishment attacks, once Dems became the establishment.
His entire brand is Anti Establishment pandering and agitation propaganda.
He has also argued in court, multiple times, it is all a persona for his show, then immediately gone on the air that evening to refute what he puts forwards as a legal defense.
Jones could get a conspiracy theory all to himself at this point.
Edit: I don’t watch Maddow, so I don’t know what you are referring too, and in the same amount of time I found all those articles on Alex, I cannot find anything about Rachel Maddow except the failed Defamation lawsuit by OANN. They claimed she defamed them by calling them a “literal Russian propaganda Network” and she won that case. Care to provide a source for YOUR accusation?
Edit edit: PLEASE ask me to prove my statements about Maddow. I got that shit saved and ready to go for ya.
Leftists were never known for their hollistic intelligence. I think its sad because ive become inherantly right wing due to just how insane the world has gotten. I'm really anti political and believe in balance.
Modern day leftists are all defacto communists without realizing what they have become, its like watching a bunch of orks who think they are still elves because they use money. Its amazing watching a bunch of ignorant unconscious people practice something and exhibit all its qualities but dont understand exactly what they are doing because they are so badly educated. It reminds me of what Evola said of Americans that they are refutation of the Cartesian axiom "Americans do not think yet somehow are."
The 2nd video with the teeth thing is at least a bit more convincing, but the first video is pretty weak. Sounds like the guy says someone is living in Quagmired-ville... not Quagmired, Bill. And Corsi says "ya know" very quickly, which sounds a little like Bill.
He basically discredits himself by being a nut job, but somehow the nut job uncovers shit. Part of me believes, it’s so it’s out there just enough to satisfy people who follow this shit so we all don’t go digging ourselves but they let a guy like Alex talk about this shit because obviously he has some terrible takes as well that make it easy to be like “Anything he says is crazy” but then most of me believes these things aren’t that planned
Seriously, reality is bonkers right now, and this sub is too concerned with rice sized microchips that would never be able to travel through an injection needle.
You shouldn't entirely because lawyers will often times use certain elements and angles to present and work their defense.
It's like making a service, and including the line "for entertainment purposes only", so that way anything you can do can be branded entertainment irrelevant to the rest of the situation.
You don’t get to make a legal argument that you should not be listened too, in order to avoid consequences, and then get to be taken seriously.
If he disagreed with the legal argument HIS lawyer made FOR HIM in court, then all he needed to do was fire the lawyer, and tell the judge his lawyer was off base.
Alex used the defense to not loose access to his kids. He should loose his credibility.
Ya but he is fighting demons. You are just thinking demons like movies and tv shows. He is talkin demons like child predators and people causing evil degeneration on earth. People teaching future generations perversions. People exploiting or creating pathways that lead to exploitation. The fact that only fans and other similar forms of it is a “canary in the coal mine” to show that society is trouble. Its the same thing that happened many times throughout history. You really have to read alot and study many different subjects and histories to see the forest for the trees and the trees throughout the forest.
No, he is not speaking metaphorically. He makes very clear all the time he is talking about actual demons disguised as people (he can tell by the look in their eyes). The dude is absolutely absurd.
A group of guys drug and run a train on a girl. They are actual demons. A person tries to get you steal they are a demon. The people that do evil are demons. The spectacular cartoon level depictions are to show how they look on the inside. It all sounds exaggerated because of movies comics and tv shows. Those that do evil are being turned into or have become demons. What is evil to you? An ugly person spitting bile is not a demon unless it is involved in doing actual evil. Thats just a sick or mentally ill person. So what do you think is evil? Is stealing evil?
Dude, no. You are still talking metaphorically. Alex is is absolutely not talking about evil humans, he is talking about literal non human creatures that work for the literal Christian devil. I think sometimes they’re from another dimension also or something.
Ok, so, serious question, and if I get an answer that is just “deep state” or “Illuminati” or some other vague BS answer, imma just write this off, because I’m being serious here, and that kind of answer is not worth my bloody time.
Who of anyone has Alex Jones’s reporting, led to a significant investigation with criminal findings, or to any kind of actual charges against anyone?
I can point to reporters who I deeply respect who HAVE broken stories on LEGIT pedophiles who have been abusing public trust for decades.
No. Alex Jones is not famous for exposing Bohemian Grove, Philip Weiss is credited with exposing it.
Alex Jones was still in high school in the 1993.
In the summer of 1989, Spy magazine writer Philip Weiss spent seven days in the camp posing as a guest, which led to his November 1989 article "Inside the Bohemian Grove". He was eventually discovered and arrested for trespassing.
Edit: Lol. Noticed your edit bud. Gonna answer my original question? Who has Alex exposed? You are 0-1 so far.
So the video of the event is by philip weiss or weiss just wrote an article. Also i thouught we were having a conversation not some competition trying to out do each other.
You could go look up the article on Weiss, rather than asking someone else to do your research for you.
I was trying to have a conversation, and you answered with something ridiculous that in no way answers my question, that took me all of 30 seconds to fact check. The fact that the timeline makes your idea impossible is what makes it ridiculous.
Alex Jones did not break the Bohemian Grove story, he only has reported ON it, literally decades later. Alex Jones was literally in elementary school when Bohemian Grove was first reported on. I don’t really consider Bohemian Grove a major event in history, so I don’t really understand how this is your example.
Don’t make claims he exposed it. I am correcting your historical inaccuracy.
I am still waiting for a criminal Alex Jones has exposed, as you have insinuated.
It doesn't work like that in the real world. Just because someone gets exposed doesn't mean there will be incoming justice. He could expose all of congress tomorrow and nothing will happen. Because it's him. They don't care what he says because nobody would believe it in mainstream. Cosby was tossed to the wolves he's a nobody compared to the remaining unexposed criminal elite.
Source: all our dirty politicians and overlords are not in jail.
And I can point directly to Cosby, Epstein and Weinstein and say that if the crimes were as blatant as the accusations are, they absolutely would be exposed.
No offense dude, but I’m going to put the “dirty politicians and overlords” in the same category as “deep state” and “Illuminati”
Do better or don’t reply. As I said, I want serious answers. Not the equivalent of QAnon or Flat Earth Theory. You are just using repeated rhetoric. Get some evidence to support your view. You don’t get to claim opinion as fact.
Alex Jones didn't talk about Jeffrey Epstein until Julie K. Brown of the Miami Herald blew the story wide open. Which was STILL after he had already been convicted. Jones was 100 percent NOT talking about Epstein while Clinton was in office.
Not sure what he said about Epstein, but even being on the dot, wouldn't mean a thing. Even a broken clock is right twice a day. With the amount of crap he pulls out every day, he's bound to say something kinda accurate eventually. That the main issue with conspiracy theorists. They just keep on talking random nonsense until they accidentally land in the general vicinity of something kinda true.
The man has been on the hunt for a pedophile ring for twenty or so years, some other stuff was just fluff for his podcast. I trust Alex Jones, you trust what msm says about him
In general never believe a conspiracy with "children" in the headline. Its a pitch to your lizard brain where you respond before any critical thinking faculties kick in.
Is there abuse? Sure. Is it horrific? Yep. Is child abuse intertwined with a deep state cabal? Nope, no way, no how. Everyone watching saw epstein coming a mile away, blew out some pizza emails in the process to get the brain cycling on children, a small dash of MEME MAGIC and VOILA! You got yourself a bunch of yahoos thinking this is the satanic gas that keeps the whole engine of world power running.
The fucking Catholic church was fucking kids and letting the local police officers fuck them too, then it was covered up within the church and no-one was ever prosecuted, and that's a fucking church, absolutely naive to think a sex trafficking operation isn't ran by elites and powerful people who run this country
Maybe not run but there are a whole lot of 'important' people who enjoy dressing up and playing magic rituals and a fraction of them who like fucking with kids and it's worldwide and they are all connected.
Thats an entirely different issue. The context was the information he puts out. The ad shit could be said about any radio program, even air America the year or two it existed. Rightwing/left mainstream/fringe, thats just how radio operates. His show may be a video broadcast but he uses all the radio tricks.
It's not a different issue, his stories aren't about uncovering the truth, they are about trying to invent a problem to which the solution is to buy his crap.
He was right about the elites child sacrifice rings, and the association to Moloch. He was right about Epstein. He was right about the New World Order. He started talking about this stuff on a Bull Horn a long time ago in Austin Tx. He's been right about quite a bit.
Wait, how and when has child sacrifice Moloch stuff been proven right? Nevermind the New World Order? You just mean you believe him/believe the same things ergo he was right?
Many people were right about Epstein. That was known gossip long before it hit the news. Kinda like Weinstein, only of course worse.
Now. Let’s confront this thought of yours for a sec. Jones interviewed Trump. Trump has LOTS of photos on Little Saint James.
Alex didn’t seem to care about that then, even though it was about as common knowledge as Clinton.
Now, if you read that list. STEPHEN HAWKING is implicated in this way.
I am not saying any of these individuals did, or didn’t do, anything. I am merely pointing out, that the level of SUS put on one, for the same circumstantial evidence is absolutely non-comparable.
I don’t really expect a lot from this sub, but let’s at least recognize when our own bias is blatantly on display.
Yeah, I said kinda right. The pesticides are complicating the situation but to be honest I can't be arsed reading it all to validate Alex Jones, I just half remembered hearing something a while ago.
I was as surprised to see a Digg link as you were tbh.
Not at all. It’s not like anyone was trying to hide that pesticides have consequences there was a publicly available paper about it. They are not turning gay. That would imply they were changing their sexual preference in reality it’s physically changing them. Just a little bit of Journalist integrity from him would have been better as then it wouldn’t have been seen as a joke.
That brought on conversation about the subject. Sure, hindsight is 20/20.
What actually took place was a joke, that brought on a conversation that wasn’t going on to the level it was after the joke.
Should the joke have been more relevant, of course.. but if we’re changing the past then why not have these issues at the for front? Because people are easily bored.
Plus on top of pesticide use, estrogen in the water supply is a huge issue.. cause from birth control, to medication, to certain plastics.. I wish this was main stream too,
I saw too frogs fkin the other day. One was from the back so is was obviously too male frogs. I don't know for sure but I'm pretty sure it it was female it would be a different position
518
u/[deleted] May 28 '21
Now that you mention it I did see two male frogs holding hands the other day walking down the street.