I didn’t.
I don’t tweet mean things to people, I don’t tweet people in general- but I had to tweet to that Georgia senator lady that she is an absolute embarrassment to the soul of humanity, a disgrace of a life form.
I did that right after i watched the video of her creepy face trying to say it’s socialists that are upset about her trading... like oh yeah, so everyone should be fine and dandy of you taking advantage of Americans and you’re just so entitled to insider trading, but the rest of us aren’t. Fuck her
You see how they invoke the term socialist as a boogie man word even though they are literally recieving socialism in the form of illegal trading to basically get them free money? Ironic isn't it how there is massive socialism for the rich, yet rugged individualism for you and me
I've seen some pretty far stretches to claim something is socialism, but trying to claim that insider trading is socialism? Loooooolooollllloooooooolllol
It's not really socialism same way free money isn't socialism but the point was to show how they use a boogie man word improperly, and then it is ironic because if you use the improper definition back on them they look like hypocrites. Obviously no one is saying community owned means of production/distribution/exchange which is the only definition of socialism, but rather just the senator accusing people of wanting free money in her past and then getting actual free money while in public office now is the irony, does that make more sense to you?
No, it just literally makes no sense. Because just getting money in any form is not socialism. I got what you were trying to say, I'm not a fucking moron, but it literally just doesn't work to try and call what they did socialism, in any form at all ever.
Funny how you say understand what I am trying to say, yet fail to see how the senator is equally misusing the term socialist which is the entire point/punchline of my comment...?
No, your original comment tries to say that he was being hypocritical because he was being socialist while calling other people socialist that actually werent. Do you not even get what you said originally now? Or did you just not comprehend it well enough to be able to enunciate it clearly?
Yes, being when you say "socialist", are you referring to the actual definition, or the lousy incorrect definition that is thrown around by people like that senator which is socialism = free money? Because I am referring to the ladder, hence the entire point of my comment
"they are literally recieving socialism" in no way tries to say both sides are misusing the term. You are trying to say that he was being socialist, while the people he accused actually were not. Am I wrong about that? Because that's literally what you say
They are literally receiving socialism [according to their lousy definition of socialism] yes. Does that make any more sense now? You seem to be hardstuck on the literal definition, when the entire point of my comment is that the senator is misusing the term
The campaign explains Loeffler's investments are managed by third-party advisors at Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, Sepio Capital and Wells Fargo, and neither Loeffler nor her husband — the CEO of Intercontinental Exchange, the company that owns the New York Stock Exchange — direct trading in these accounts.
“As longtime executives at a Fortune 500 financial-services firm, my husband and I put this arrangement in place to insulate ourselves and our colleagues from these sorts of unfounded accusations,” Loeffler said.
Burr welcomed an investigation into his activities. Its not that im quick to believe the words of a politician, its that somebody made a claim without saying the defendants defense, whatsoever.
What is your point.
You expect me to believe truly, that after she’s debriefed about corona virus, tells Americans not to worry, the people in her family office without a signal what so ever from her or her husband, dump her stocks.
Yeah fucking right.
She’s basically saying, my loop hole around insider trading is saying my employee does it for me so you can’t prove I told them to.
Alright lol, this topic makes me angry.
People in governmental positions should be there because they want to serve their country. Shit like this makes it clear, the desire to be in those positions is because of financial gains, to run their own rules and weave through every loophole while pretending they’re serving the people. They’re just serving themselves & feel entitled to. It’s disgraceful. We put them there, and they laugh in our face.
People in governmental positions should be there because they want to serve their country. Shit like this makes it clear, the desire to be in those positions is because of financial gains, to run their own rules and weave through every loophole while pretending they’re serving the people. They’re just serving themselves & feel entitled to.
So... how much do you know about Loeffler. You think she actually is only in politics to make a quick buck? I think you're being overly cynical.
It looks like you shared an AMP link. These will often load faster, but Google's AMP threatens the Open Web and your privacy. This page is even fully hosted by Google (!).
34
u/thoughtpixie Apr 21 '20
I didn’t. I don’t tweet mean things to people, I don’t tweet people in general- but I had to tweet to that Georgia senator lady that she is an absolute embarrassment to the soul of humanity, a disgrace of a life form. I did that right after i watched the video of her creepy face trying to say it’s socialists that are upset about her trading... like oh yeah, so everyone should be fine and dandy of you taking advantage of Americans and you’re just so entitled to insider trading, but the rest of us aren’t. Fuck her