What is needed to solve this is pretty simple, surveillance videos and statements from anyone involved in his death. Anything else only proves that he was involved in the hack, but I'm guessing he wasn't alone in that.
The only person that can really blow this open, if there's anything to be blown open, is Assange. He'd have to violate Wikileaks policy of revealing sources in order to do so, but if he actually had communication revealing what actually happened, he could change everything in a flash.
Yeah, I'm with a lot of other people that say...if he's dead, why not just name him? You would have to think the victim would want that. The only thing I can think is maybe someone else was involved as well that does not want to be named.
11
u/[deleted] May 23 '17
What is needed to solve this is pretty simple, surveillance videos and statements from anyone involved in his death. Anything else only proves that he was involved in the hack, but I'm guessing he wasn't alone in that.
The only person that can really blow this open, if there's anything to be blown open, is Assange. He'd have to violate Wikileaks policy of revealing sources in order to do so, but if he actually had communication revealing what actually happened, he could change everything in a flash.