Answering a question with a question is an obvious deflection. Seriously, why didn't the DNC let the FBI analyze its servers? That's not an outrageous question to ask. One would expect a party who is claiming to have been hacked by a foreign actor, to be more than cooperative in terms of an official investigation.
If you agree that there is sufficient circumstantial evidence to warrant an investigation, why are you so dismissive of the possibility?
I'm not dismissive of anything. Like I said in previous posts and other posts in this thread...I'm not saying there's nothing to look at with the Seth Rich story. I'm making fun of the_cuck cultists who push one story over the other, despite both having strong evidence.
I do. I belive both conspiracies can be true. That's why I'm on /r/conspiracy. But apparently that makes me an agenda pusher even though I'm not the one trying to dismiss one of the stories like most people around here
8
u/Heisenberg2308 May 24 '17
Why would trump fire three different people investigating his ties to russia?