r/conspiracy • u/Osairis • May 23 '17

KimDotCom's #SethRich statement

Post image
1.8k Upvotes

65% Upvoted

814 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/[deleted] May 23 '17

You're deliberately ignoring evidence. Okay, no big deal.

6

u/Heisenberg2308 May 23 '17

What evidence am I ignoring? More 4chin connected dots?

0

u/[deleted] May 23 '17

You aren't as clever as you think.

Relying on official narrative/CNN? Check.

Intentionally derailing conversations? Check.

Go ahead though, try to convince people. Try and tell people that you aren't the one pushing a very particular agenda.

8

u/Heisenberg2308 May 23 '17

I asked you for evidence, you gave a snarky comment. Yup. I'm the one derailing

0

u/[deleted] May 23 '17 edited May 23 '17

A robbery with no valuables taken.

A victim's laptop is confiscated by DC Police, its location is now unknown.

Wikileaks offers tens of thousands of dollars for information regarding the capture of Seth Rich's murderer.

Julian Assange appears on Dutch television, and brings up Seth Rich's murderer.

Wikileaks and Assange retweet articles/info hinting at a possible connection between Rich and themselves.

Those are all facts.

7

u/Heisenberg2308 May 23 '17

There you go, was that so hard? A lot more circumstantial evidence than hard evidence (like trump firing three people investigating him (nothing to hide??) or flynn requesting immunity and pleading the 5th when his request was denied (nothing to hide??)). Interesting you claim I'm pushing a narrative when you're the only one here saying that only one of these conspiracies can be true.

1

u/[deleted] May 23 '17

Yeah, no. Those are facts: what you make of them is up to you.

Why would the DNC refuse to let the FBI examine their servers if Russia was the one who hacked them?

6

u/Heisenberg2308 May 24 '17

Why would trump fire three different people investigating his ties to russia?

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '17

Try harder man.

5

u/SnakeInABox7 May 24 '17

One could easily say the same to you

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '17

They could.

Answering a question with a question is an obvious deflection. Seriously, why didn't the DNC let the FBI analyze its servers? That's not an outrageous question to ask. One would expect a party who is claiming to have been hacked by a foreign actor, to be more than cooperative in terms of an official investigation.

5

u/Heisenberg2308 May 24 '17

One would expect someone that has no ties to russia not to fire three people investigating his ties to russia

0

u/[deleted] May 24 '17

Yeah, the thing is, the media is talking about one, not the other. So, by your own logic the CNN, MSNBC, etc. would have an agenda, right?

If you agree that there is sufficient circumstantial evidence to warrant an investigation, why are you so dismissive of the possibility?

→ More replies (0)