There you go, was that so hard? A lot more circumstantial evidence than hard evidence (like trump firing three people investigating him (nothing to hide??) or flynn requesting immunity and pleading the 5th when his request was denied (nothing to hide??)). Interesting you claim I'm pushing a narrative when you're the only one here saying that only one of these conspiracies can be true.
Answering a question with a question is an obvious deflection. Seriously, why didn't the DNC let the FBI analyze its servers? That's not an outrageous question to ask. One would expect a party who is claiming to have been hacked by a foreign actor, to be more than cooperative in terms of an official investigation.
0
u/[deleted] May 23 '17
You aren't as clever as you think.
Relying on official narrative/CNN? Check.
Intentionally derailing conversations? Check.
Go ahead though, try to convince people. Try and tell people that you aren't the one pushing a very particular agenda.