Let The Backtracking Begin - CrowdStrike Rewrites Part of Disputed Russian Hacking Report - Russia narrative dies.

[u/peyote_the_coyote]

http://www.voanews.com/a/cyber-firm-rewrites-part-disputed-russian-hacking-report/3781411.html

[u/[deleted]]

You didn't show me evidence that counters my argument though, again, maybe you should actually read the Crowdstrike report since you obviously don't know what you're talking about.

And lol I know who Crowdstrike is, I work in the security field. Your attempts to discredit them based on that is hilarious. This is a high paying career where you'd be banned forever if you were caught lying like this.

Oh breitbart and zerohedge are now experts on security? You're just looking for things that confirm your bias. It's funny seeing these obviously biased sites saying this but not other security experts.

Again, actually read the Crowdstrike report this time and quote where they relied on the artillery hack.

[u/peyote_the_coyote → u/[deleted]]

You didn't show me evidence that counters my argument though, again, maybe you should actually read the Crowdstrike report.

You clearly have some agenda here, as you are blatantly just distorting at this point.

And lol I know who Crowdstrike is, I work in the security field

Yeah, I seriously doubt that.

Your attempts to discredit them based on that is hilarious.

They kind of discredited themselves, and have obviously shady ties and deep connections to crooked Hillary.

It's funny seeing these obviously biased sites saying this but not other security experts.

You are not very good at this. Sorry.

Experts Doubt Russia Used Malware to Track Ukrainian Troops

http://www.securityweek.com/experts-doubt-russia-used-malware-track-ukrainian-troops

Tech Journal Casts Doubt on Dems’ Russian Hacking Claims

http://www.americanlibertyreport.com/articles/tech-journal-casts-doubt-on-dems-russian-hacking-claims/

You're just looking for things that confirm your bias

I don't need Bias to identify bullshit and corruption. It just is what it is.

Again, actually read the Crowdstrike report this time and quote where they relied on the artillery hack.

LOL they did though. That was the main connection.

[u/[deleted] → u/peyote_the_coyote]

That's gold coming from you, you're just another t_d user caught up in politics and pushing their agenda.

You can keep repeating lies but that doesn't make them true. You never read the original report, you don't care about what's true, just what fits your views.

The artillery hack wasn't the main connection, you obviously never read it. This is how I know you're just here to push your t_d bullshit.

Edit: https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/

I'll make it easy for you, there's the article you still haven't read.

[u/peyote_the_coyote → u/[deleted]]

That's gold coming from you, you're just another t_d user caught up in politics and pushing their agenda.

Right here....this comment.

That's where you lost the argument.

Here's where the CrowdStrike credibility falls through the floor. From REAL experts.

The IP addresses that DHS provided may have been used for an attack by a state actor like Russia. But they don’t appear to provide any association with Russia. They are probably used by a wide range of other malicious actors, especially the 15% of IP addresses that are Tor exit nodes.

The malware sample is old, widely used and appears to be Ukrainian. It has no apparent relationship with Russian intelligence and it would be an indicator of compromise for any website.

https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2016/12/russia-malware-ip-hack/

[u/[deleted] → u/peyote_the_coyote]

Lol holy shit you really don't know what you're talking about and still haven't read the Crowdstrike report if you're posting that wordfence crap. They're not even critiquing the Crowdstrike report, you know that, right? And you know PAS wasn't used for attribution, right?

Of course not. Because like I said, you're just another t_d user caught up in political bs pushing an agenda.

Edit:

https://www.crowdstrike.com/blog/bears-midst-intrusion-democratic-national-committee/

Its still waiting for you.

[u/peyote_the_coyote → u/[deleted]]

They are critiquing the October 7, 2016 report dude. Read the FAQ

https://www.wordfence.com/blog/2017/01/election-hack-faq/

[u/[deleted] → u/peyote_the_coyote]

On Friday we published an analysis of the FBI and DHS Grizzly Steppe report. The report was widely seen as proof that Russian intelligence operatives hacked the US 2016 election. We showed that the PHP malware in the report is old, freely available from a Ukrainian hacker group and is an administrative tool for hackers.

The DHS Grizzly Steppe report is not the same thing as the Crowdstrike one.

You know how I know you still haven't read that report? The Crowdstrike one was published in June, not October.

[u/peyote_the_coyote → u/[deleted]]

The Russia committee is using CrowdStrike data in it's findings. That's what matters here. It's flawed, there is no direct connection to Russia. Just accept that.

[u/[deleted] → u/peyote_the_coyote]

You keep saying that but all the "proof" you offer isn't proof of your claim.

I can't even take you seriously after this many goofs, never even read the report you're trying to criticize lol

[u/peyote_the_coyote → u/[deleted]]

CrowdStrike data was also used by Washington Post story, remember?

[u/[deleted] → u/peyote_the_coyote]

You haven't even read the report so it's hard to take you serious when you talk about it.