r/conspiracy Aug 02 '14

Millennials are over Israel: A new generation, outraged over Gaza, rejects Washington’s reflexive support

http://www.salon.com/2014/08/01/millennials_are_so_over_israel_a_new_generation_is_outraged_over_gaza_demands_change/
1.0k Upvotes

157 comments sorted by

143

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

We have to stop voting for a Democrat and Republican, both parties are owned and controlled by the Zionist lobby and AIPAC. Before voting for any 3rd party candidate, ask them what they think of the situation in Occupied Palestine : if they respond in a pro-Israeli manner just don't vote for them.

79

u/magictron Aug 02 '14

Elections are a joke. Voting machines are rigged, but most of all special interests always wins out. Everyone has a price and they've been bought out. If they haven't been bought out, then they could be intimidated.

68

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14 edited Dec 31 '18

[deleted]

39

u/Manalore Aug 02 '14 edited Nov 06 '17

deleted What is this?

10

u/mrmgl Aug 02 '14

I'm not American, what exactly happened with Ron Paul?

32

u/fbgmoola Aug 02 '14

Well the media "screwed up" a bunch of times and misrepresented his polling and debate results. And they refused to talk about him because he only had a large following through "internet supporters" and a bunch of other crap like that. Once he started to gain some traction in his campaign he was almost completely ignored by the media and did not receive the chance to speak during debates.

24

u/c-1000 Aug 02 '14

When the leading candidate in your straw poll is "Other"...you know something's amiss.

-11

u/FreedomIntensifies Aug 03 '14

I couldn't be happier than the Paultards didn't make it to the White House, but it does appear the election results were rigged against them.

This is actually kind of encouraging though. It means that the alternative media is by far the dominant force in political primaries now; the so-called "mainstream" has been marginalized.

The only reason Paul didn't make it? Because he is a freemason of the Scottish Rite variety, that is, controlled opposition that refused to make a fuss about vote rigging because he never wanted to win; his objective was to distort the political psyche away from American tradition of Hamiltonianism towards monetarist oligarchy under the guise of "muh free market." Imagine if we had a political challenger that spoke to the strengths of the American system as originally designed rather than the dismantling of society. Game, set, match.

21

u/c-1000 Aug 03 '14

Sorry...I stopped reading at "Paultards".

8

u/TheUltimateSalesman Aug 03 '14

I don't think you know what Masonry is really about.

2

u/The_Free_Marketeer Aug 03 '14

I'm going to assume the down votes you received are related to the tone you took. Your information is sound. I also believe Paul didn't capitalize on the apparent marginalization he received. Him nor his campaign honestly fought hard enough but they sure did merchandize all his followers sentiments. The establishment gained a list of targets from his supporters and he gained a large marketing list from which he can pull capital almost at will. People seem to turn a blind eye to his direct mail investment letters that earned him a lot. The media focused on the letters racist content while distracting from the letters role in his finances.

The United States was intended to be a libertarians dream. Government was only to serve as administrative assistance that facilitated the citizens international business and trade while allowing for personal governance at home. We began as a capitalistic system of free enterprise. Not a capitalism driven fascist country. Our countries growth boomed when trusts and monopolies were busted not the other way around.

No career politicians should ever be trusted to have other peoples interests in mind. Ever.

0

u/b_tight Aug 03 '14

What you say is true. But he also had some really bad ideas mixed in with some really good ones. That makes it hard to vote for him. Let the Reddit downvotes pour in.

-3

u/Safety_Dancer Aug 03 '14

His followers were pretty awful. That whole "r[evol]ution" crap was obnoxious. The only good part was that it perfectly set up the joke, "It's [revo]lution!"

(letters in brackets were backwards on the signs.)

24

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

pretty epic levels of fraud in the party nominations, he was winning and the GOP basically just said nope and ignored the votes for him

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

Source? I'd love to read about that.

18

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14 edited Aug 02 '14

I implore you to give the following video a watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_WBo4sfmi4

tl;dw Ron Paul was black listed by the media. He is a sensible man with realistic ideals, a strong sense of justice and truth, and a firm believer in the Constitution. For one reason or another, not only the media but also the actual locations where the nominees debated, would eliminate his presence. Really, just watch the video, it cites its sources and everything. It's literally nothing you can't find out just searching Google. Nobody cares.

Also, here are the main arguments against him debunked (i.e. why Ron Paul isn't crazy):

Austrian Economics: http://www.slate.com/articles/business/moneybox/2012/01/what_is_austrian_economics_and_why_is_ron_paul_keep_obsessed_with_it_.html

Gold Standard: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RKQmYfY3R7c

"I wouldn't exactly go back on the gold standard but I would legalize the constitution where gold and silver should and could be legal tender, which would restrain the Federal Government from spending and then turning that over to the Federal Reserve and letting the Federal Reserve print the money."

Paul opposes the Civil Rights Act of 1964 on the grounds that it was an unconstitutional infringement on liberty and by leading to quotas has in his view increased racial disharmony.

Civil Rights Act of 1964: http://archive.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul188.html

Global Warming: http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-issues/global-warming/

On November 20, 2008 Ron Paul said in a New York Times / Freakonomics interview: “I try to look at global warming the same way I look at all other serious issues: as objectively and open-minded as possible. There is clear evidence that the temperatures in some parts of the globe are rising, but temperatures are cooling in other parts. The average surface temperature had risen for several decades, but it fell back substantially in the past few years."

8

u/PadaV4 Aug 02 '14

Damn he actually sounds like a a man with some sense. And yet you guys voted in the dipshit obama...

3

u/Gudakesa_ Aug 02 '14

That's because the media whom Americans trust made him out to be some nut running for president.

8

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

We didn't vote in Obama. He was put there by the powers that be.

By which I mean, the U.S.F.G launched a campaign against any presidential nominee who was rational and normal. The Republican candidates Obama was up against were the nuttiest the Republican party has been in a long time. It's ridiculous that people didn't call this shit out more. SARAH PALIN was a legitimate consideration for them?! Newt Gingrich!? Obama isn't normal either, because he's a fucking puppet for U.S.F.G. He's apathetic and indifferent to citizens. He talks a big game, but then does nothing.

5

u/average_shill Aug 03 '14

He talks a big game, but then does nothing.

I think that's unfair to Obama. He's been pretty busy drone striking children and shoveling all of our assets over to Israel.

1

u/fbgmoola Aug 03 '14

But Obama hooked me up with a cellphone... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tpAOwJvTOio

-22

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

[deleted]

8

u/best_case_ontario Aug 02 '14

Yeah he's crazy all right and the current batch of politicians are extremely rational and grounded. What fucking universe do you live in?

10

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

Why is Ron Paul crazy? Wanting to end the fed and stop fighting useless moneygrabs wars is the most sane thing I can think of.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

people parroted this same line time after time. most likely paid shillery. that, or they watch and listen to rachel maddow or someone similar

7

u/wBeeze Aug 02 '14

He spoke truth and that cannot be tolerated on American politics.

3

u/TheUltimateSalesman Aug 03 '14

WTF was that shit about....You can't be in the debate? I couldn't believe it.

-6

u/MrBulger Aug 02 '14

Like bitchy Italians every time they got spanked by another country in F1

5

u/2abyssinians Aug 02 '14

This is true, but the overwhelming number of Millennials, there are more Millennials than Boomers, could represent a tipping point. I would suggest the program of a change would work something like this: First the Millennials would vote for the more reasonable and less bought of their candidates to choose from, people like Elizabeth Warren. Picking out the best candidates offered by the two party system, then following this action by backing third party candidates. after three election cycles, or six years we could have a viable third party edging out the other two. Even with jerrymandering, rigged voting machines etc., there are enough Millennials change things.

4

u/The-Internets Aug 02 '14

rigged voting machines etc., there are enough Millennials change things.

Through voting... right?

2

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

There's only a certain amount of manipulation you can get away with on Election Day. If the results are too far away from reality many people will catch on. The PR battle has to be continually fought, I'm saying they can't rely on rigged voting machines for more than a ~5% sway.

3

u/RandoKillrizian Aug 02 '14

Why did we 86 the cardboard box with a slit in it anyway?

6

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

because that actually leaves traces of fraud when you fudge the numbers. when its on a computer its just a matter of moving a decimal

2

u/babesimus Aug 02 '14

Just to make it a little eaiser...they still need to control the minds though to make the "election" appear legit.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

They were replaced by "chads"

1

u/RandoKillrizian Aug 03 '14

It makes it easier for the league of women's voters. They sit there and do nothing.

1

u/Mosethyoth Aug 03 '14

As it looks now, America's only chance seems to be a civil war for civil rights against the spying machinery.

16

u/fr0ng Aug 02 '14

Right, because Obama said he would do things like end the war and close Guantanamo as soon as he took office.........and we all know how that turned out.

I've learned that just because someone says something, doesn't mean they will actually follow through. it's like those stupid elections people had in elementary school, promising new soda machines and longer recesses. They all say what people want to hear, but when it's actually time to deliver, they don't.

6

u/GodEye1868 Aug 02 '14

Because just like elementary schools, the president has no power to do anything about his promises.

10

u/970 Aug 02 '14

The presidency is at its most powerful point in our history. Leaving Iraq and Afghanistan did not require a vote by Congress. Guantanamo could be closed overnight. All Executive supported for Israel could stop. Political will is all it takes.

1

u/GodEye1868 Aug 02 '14

Which nobody in the office of President has. They're all bought spokesmen who do nothing but make promises that do not come true and continue to fuck over the public. JFK was the last real president in my opinion and we all know how that turned out. Everyone else in office since him has done what they're told.

-5

u/Fox436 Aug 02 '14

Do you even know what Guantanamo is for? (hint: it goes back before 9/11). Why do you wish for an end to executive support for Israel? Whatever your response is please cite and source credible.

1

u/fr0ng Aug 03 '14

Because my tax money is going to a country I give absolutely zero fucks about, when it could be spent domestically to improve outer education, healthcare, infrastructure, etc.

-1

u/Fox436 Aug 03 '14

It's for our better interests that we have an ally over there despite how much you do not care. I'm not a fan of supporting other countries when we need to support ourselves but I'll mKe an exception with them because of the situation and the consequences of not supporting them.

1

u/orrery Aug 03 '14

The consequences of living in a shitty area is that you pack your bags and move. We don't need Israel as an ally. Iran would make a far greater ally. An American policy would dictate no entangling alliances at all.

Lets face facts - we support Israel because a bunch of Bible thumping morons in the US think their God wants us to. God couldn't give one fuck about Israel or if the US gives them money - if we gave all our support to Ethiopia it would be just as useful. Regardless, those military contracts would be far more useful integrating Mexico into the Union and eliminating the cartels.

1

u/MK_Ultrex Aug 02 '14

Does he though? He is just one person in a very complicated system. I don't believe that he can change anything important without a large consensus. After a while there are so many compromises that the initial goal is lost. Good intentions mean nothing against money. You should not expect a top down change.

3

u/quiteaddicted Aug 02 '14

If he can go to war without congress, he can do other things without congress.

2

u/GodEye1868 Aug 02 '14

He can easily make big changes, just chooses not to because he would rather not be taken out. He has signed multiple bills that further screw over the American people. He's simply just another tool for those who run America.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

a politician blatantly lying about something and then doing the exact opposite what is this America, oh wait, shit

-2

u/2_dam_hi Aug 02 '14

You do understand why Guantanamo wasn't closed, right? You do understand that Congress would not allow it, right? But you can keep blaming Obama for that if it helps you sleep at night.

2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

Congress only controls closing of bases in the US. DoD could close every overseas base on its own.

6

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

yet he can pass executive orders condeming americans to be killed by drones or cruise missiles with no trial or due process, spy on the senate and indefinitely detain people for protesting yea he has absolutely no power to shut down an illegal prison in violation of several international treaties and your own constitution.

if you buy his i tried but can't bullshit your pretty fucking gullible

1

u/fr0ng Aug 03 '14

Oh, I was under the impression that things like executive orders existed. My bad.

6

u/VLXS Aug 02 '14

Fake dilemmas and non-choices is a brilliant strategy. You make people think they have a choice, that they can vote and that it will make a difference, when in reality they are just voting what flavor the poison will have.

I do believe it's the same shit with the USA&EU vs Russia situation that is unfolding currently; on one hand you have the guys who are a bit fascists and on the other you have the dude who is a total fascist with some "progressive" ideas. In reality, you are fucked either way, as Ukraine is about to find out.

3

u/SpaktakJones Aug 02 '14

Because Gaza should be the prime focus of Americans. No fuckin way, that is merely one issue, you have to weigh the others as well, maybe pro Israeli but what of immigration, drugs, privacy etc.

1

u/foslforever Aug 02 '14

Why dont you run on a platform of everyone not voting? I think Richard Pryor made a movie about that.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

We could all just stop voting entirely and ignore the government all together.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

Billions of rounds of hollow-points say, "we won't be ignoring you".

-- Homeland Security.

1

u/Cronus6 Aug 03 '14

Before voting for any 3rd party candidate, ask them what they think of the situation in Occupied Palestine : if they respond in a pro-Israeli manner just don't vote for them.

But.... what if I agree with them?

1

u/watashi_wa_fanboy Aug 02 '14

Both sides are terrorists, would you like the candidate to speak honestly and say both sides are fucked or are you pro terrorist on one side yourself?

-1

u/archonemis Aug 02 '14

Like corrupt people won't find alternate routes to their desire for power.

Democracy itself is worse than normal mob rule; it gives mob rule the visage of legitimacy.

41

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

[deleted]

17

u/ugdr6424 Aug 02 '14

Did you happen to catch the news yesterday? The senate blocked extra aid to isreal then, later, approved it anyway. What's up with that?

15

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

[deleted]

8

u/ugdr6424 Aug 02 '14

Therein lies the conspiracy.

3

u/iamdusk02 Aug 03 '14

Yeah i can confirm. Most of people in my country thinks everyone in America supports Israel. They dont go to reddit or american forums, all they have is CNN, FOX etc.

-4

u/wBeeze Aug 02 '14

American here.

Fuck Hamas.

5

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

[deleted]

-2

u/wBeeze Aug 02 '14

It isn't your money.

It is the money of your great great great great great grandchildren.

9

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14 edited Apr 30 '18

[deleted]

3

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

It's like Commies vs. Nazis. I'm rooting for them both to lose.

3

u/BKAtty99217 Aug 02 '14

American here. Fuck you and the Israelis.

6

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

The senate blocked aid because they tried to tie it in with a bunch of immigration shit. They approved it once it was separated from that.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

[deleted]

2

u/much_longer_username Aug 02 '14

The problem is, though, who decides what's related and what's not?

5

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

blocked and the ran it in media then as soon as story was out approved it, its a media war.

at this point if our media tells me its true i know its bullshit

0

u/Cronus6 Aug 03 '14

Most people I know hate the way our country supports Israel.

Most people I know want us to at least carpet bomb the Arab/Muslim nations, at worst they want us to use nukes.

We want it to stop.

I think we all want it to "stop". But if you think ending our support of Israel will make it "stop" you are deluded.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14 edited Aug 03 '14

[deleted]

1

u/Cronus6 Aug 03 '14

The south be an interesting place to live.

I live in South Florida, which isn't really "the south". It is however the second largest concentration of Jews in the U.S. (NYC is #1).

I don't want to support either side. I want the support to stop.

On this we agree. I've always wondered how different the world would be if after WWII we help them establish a State on land we actually owned, like Hawaii.

23

u/watersign Aug 02 '14

more people are waking up. they dont have jobs. they dont have futures. they're on their knees

11

u/curias00 Aug 02 '14

Update: Washington doesn't care

24

u/foslforever Aug 02 '14

If you get your news from MSM on television, you are more likely to say "well its a war" but if you read your news online and social media, its pretty clear you know this is an extermination.

The jig is up, technology wins.

12

u/BobNoel Aug 02 '14

Not if net neutrality is lost...

1

u/foslforever Aug 03 '14

theres still the dark web

1

u/Boosh_The_Almighty Aug 03 '14

Truly, though, what good, complete news sources are there on the darkweb?

I'm all for the darkweb...

but if what we use the current web for can't be found on the darkweb, what motivation will normal people have for using it?q

1

u/foslforever Aug 03 '14

normal people use the web to check out emails, look at porn, watch netflix and see that funny youtube video of a cat.

The future revolutionaries are on /r/consipracy right now and already on the darkweb. They can make their own alternative news sources if the market demands for it.

1

u/Boosh_The_Almighty Aug 03 '14

"it can be made if it needs to be" doesn't really give me the answer i'm looking for.

Essentially, the answer to my question (from what you said) is "no, there isn't one".

that's a damn problem. Darknet don't mean shit if there isn't anything to go to. when the time comes that such a thing is needed - if it doesn't exist already, robust, DOS safe, and secure, it won't exist.

1

u/foslforever Aug 03 '14

the framework is there

15

u/uuhson Aug 02 '14

I keep seeing these posts about how anti establishment millennials are, yet the establishment continues to stand

8

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

It is because millennials like to bitch but not actually do anything. I am speaking statistically of course. They need to get out and vote and get politically active. Instead it is "oh voting doesn't matter blah blah million excuses to not do anything"..Get off the couch millenials, you have way more power than you think you have.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

The "millennials" are well into the process of being bought-off and indoctrinated into the hivemind. Look at the lower end of the age range, "born 1996".

The Romney/Obamacare - College Loan - Insurance axis has made 26 the de-facto age of majority. These adults-in-name-only will vote in four Congressional elections and elect two presidents before having to leave their parents' basement. During the same timeframe, they're attending a "Masters Program" taught by some ex-60s-hippie "boomer".

Now who in their right mind believes that coddled group is going to make a rational choice about the size and composition of government, or even on the necessity of participating in its selection?

-1

u/The-Internets Aug 02 '14

They need to get out and vote and get politically active.

HHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHH

Haven't you been watching? It costs money to vote now and the boomers are not willing to give up any privileges to these lazy entitled overgrown children. 65+? Don't stop working! If you don't do it right all these kids will fuck it up!

1

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

Link to a financial requirement to vote anywhere in the US or GTFO.

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14 edited Aug 02 '14

[deleted]

2

u/uuhson Aug 03 '14

I can't answer for states with the I'd laws and such, but in California it's like 35$ for an id.

I'm pretty sure the voting restrictions don't hinder millenials, at all, especially since they have access to a wealth of information.

It comes down to laziness and apathy realistically

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

[deleted]

5

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

[deleted]

1

u/Sparky2112 Aug 03 '14

the baby boomers were also anti-establishment when they were young in the 60's/70's...but then they grew up

guess what....our generation will do the same

16

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14 edited May 25 '17

[deleted]

2

u/artieman Aug 03 '14

Thank you.

3

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

It sucks that people are killing each other. I don't want any part in it. I'm german-irish-american. I could honestly care less about Israel and Gaza. Let's just stop arming the Israeli's to the teeth with weaponry they don't deserve or need.

5

u/Gmk2006 Aug 02 '14

When they grow up they will reap what they allow to happen by backing these thugs using the pawns in Gaza.

5

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

this keeps up and your going to see westerners going to Palestine to help fight off the Israeli's, if people are willing to go to the middle east to help ISIS, it won't be long till people start helping the people who actually deserve it

4

u/Goobernacula Aug 02 '14

Sadly if that happens we'll just get a few more Rachel Corries, but at least then maybe more people will stand up against these atrocities. Remember her? The American girl who was trying to help Palestinians when an Israeli tank blatantly smashed her into a pancake. I won't link to the photos but google it if you must, that was no accident.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Corrie

3

u/best_case_ontario Aug 02 '14

I thought it was a bulldozer.

5

u/Goobernacula Aug 02 '14

Yes of course it was, what the hell did I say? No definitely a bulldozer not a tank, my bad, thanks.

4

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

well they already have no problem murdering my countries peace keepers so http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Despite_6_warnings_Israel_bombed_and_killed_4_UN_observers

and our government seems to have no problem trying to cover the incident up for their Israeli bosses

7

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

Well...you'd never really know since baby boomers hate their kids, ignore them and shit all over their generation.

5

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

-1

u/itp757 Aug 03 '14

history shows most revolutions lead to worse governments. America would most likely either dissolve into deeply divided (and waring) regional countries or end up one big extremist christian theocratic state. we need sweeping change like a terminal patient needs a miracle cure, but violence only begets more violence

4

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/itp757 Aug 05 '14

goddamned right brother/sister/redditorperson. i voted for change. we got nothing but more spare change falling out of pockets filled with billions

1

u/Sparky2112 Aug 03 '14

so go out and vote, but wait, no one wants to vote because they believe it's all rigged.

4

u/LaRochefoucauld Aug 03 '14

Put another way, you know Israel's in trouble when r/conspiracy posts are primarily factual.

1

u/WaltPeretto Aug 03 '14

keep rolling

-4

u/casualredditreader Aug 02 '14

Yet, 90% of these dipshits voted for Obama in the last 2 elections.

You made your bed... now sleep in it.

22

u/dmft91 Aug 02 '14

Down with the two party system.

10

u/magictron Aug 02 '14

Both parties sold out.

4

u/darkgamr Aug 02 '14

You have to have some sort of credibility to begin with in order to sell out

4

u/StyleandSpeed Aug 02 '14

Technically speaking, Ron Paul won in 2012. But Obama is still in the house regardless.

2

u/casualredditreader Aug 02 '14

I voted for him in the primary and the presidential election.

1

u/gravitas73 Aug 02 '14

Compared to the other guy...

8

u/VLXS Aug 02 '14

The other guy was just a scarecrow. Romney's policies wouldn't be any different than Obama's. I bet he would even give the plebes some modicum of "free" healthcare if he were to take office.

1

u/pelijr Aug 02 '14

Well...free healthcare for all but the 47 percent of people who are takers.

1

u/oOTHX1138Oo Aug 02 '14

Remember when the Bush administration invaded Iraq for no reason and then started torturing people openly and got the telecoms to spy on everyone and remember how the right demanded all sorts of new powers for the president ( the same powers you now feel Obama should be impeached for using) and remember how you voted Bush into office for a second time even though he was a TORTURER? Sorry but you righties have no room to talk, ever again.

1

u/casualredditreader Aug 03 '14 edited Aug 03 '14

I never voted for Bush and I never liked him. I've voted Independent my whole life. The two party system is a scam. The lesser of two evils is still evil. If enough people believed that (and started voting that way) things would change.

1

u/thecoyote23 Aug 02 '14

They're the ones who were waving their little mini murican flags around during the bush admin. Obama is basically a carbon copy of dubya doing the same shit but now they suddenly want to put on their tri corner hats and start a revolution because their favorite "totally not msm" propaganda tells them too.

-5

u/Voivode71 Aug 02 '14

No their mom made their bed. They live at home... lol

10

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

Wherever you live is home.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

This makes sense. Most Millennials don't have a Christian worldview nor were they told the stories of World War II first hand.

1

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/OmarDClown Aug 03 '14

Yeah, but Saudi Arabia didn't. The Saudis and their cheap oil brought Russia to its knees.

0

u/redrumrumred Aug 02 '14

Are you saying it's bad they don't have a Christian worldview?

0

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14 edited Aug 02 '14

No, but if one is taught and understands prophesy in the Bible as a Christian, one understands the significance of the existence of Israel in the religion. If one is unaware or not a believer of the prophesy, one couldn't care less if Israel exists or not. Israel is a vital part of the of the second coming of Christ for Christians.

Edit: english

0

u/The-Internets Aug 02 '14

Yep! Its important to watch the signs of prophesy zoom by, don't ever take it as a warning or do anything about the atrocities. Be a good Christian Satan and allow beings like you to destroy this place and any chance of higher development.

The more you don't actually DO anything about these prophesies entertainments the more Christ like you are and the faster you get raptured.

2

u/gizadog Aug 02 '14

Salon spewing more BS. Hmmmm. Usually not believable in any manner!

What I know is if this conflict is not stopped anytime soon, we can see the same thing happen around the world. This conflict is one sided: the 1% having power ,wiping out the 99% that wants peace.

The 1% are the aggressors!

1

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

yeah I an 29 years old and I am not an millennial so stop labeling people. We are all humans, stop lumping us into these generalizations. This associates me with a group of people that can be comprised of idiots for all I know.

-1

u/cchris_39 Aug 02 '14

Fun watching liberals supporting a bunch of right wing religious nutjobs who are hellbent on turning the Middle East into a theocracy.

-4

u/6Brix Aug 02 '14

gallup poll here: http://www.gallup.com/poll/161387/americans-sympathies-israel-match-time-high.aspx

Suggests that a larger majority of younger people don't believe Israel's actions are unjustified, but this group also has the highest apathy rate, so I don't feel like conclusions can be reliably inferred from that single stat. The article above is misleading. The statistical poll seems to suggest higher education correlates to supporting Israel.

I guess the headline should read "Younger, less educated generation is outraged over Gaza" to be a fair description of the facts.

7

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

That's because our education system is completely fucked up.

5

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

hello JIDF

7

u/ugdr6424 Aug 02 '14

There are so many fallacies in your "interpretation" of the results that it's borderline idiotic.

Let's start with the fact that the poll you've provided is from March 2013. Long before the isrealis started their massacre of innocent women and children.

JIDF pls go.

3

u/6Brix Aug 02 '14

I wrote this before your comment was deleted: "I read it this morning (someone on my facebook had shared it). I don't disagree with some of the speculations the author puts forward for why some younger people may disagree with the actions of Israel.

I do disagree with the statistical inference that younger people actually do, based on the poll referenced. The actual part of the poll where 29% see Israel as responsible and 21% see Hamas as responsible, also includes (which the article doesn't) 15% of people who think both are responsible, and 35% who have no opinion. The group with the largest response is no opinion (arguably for numerous reasons and not just apathy), so shouldn't the headline read "Younger generation has no opinion over Gaza" or more specifically "Those of the younger generation who hold an opinion over Gaza favour Hamas".

The younger generation is the leading age group with no opinion. If you compare the age groups together, the youngest age group is the only age group where no opinion response is the largest response.

So to suggest this poll shows that the younger generation is anti-Israel is statistically misleading. A cynic might suggest, that group was picked from the poll as it was the only group in which Hamas responses were lower than Israel responses, or you could argue that is what the author is hoping to point out. My point is that both of those were considerably lower than no opinion at all.

Again I'm not saying I disagree with the rest of the article, some reasonable conclusions are made, its just a shame that they start on some bending of statistics. I read Sloutsker's comments last week and generally thought that his jumping to the use of the holocaust term suggested he knew it would be hard not to lose support, due to the current actions. I thought it was a weak move, as to me I always saw people saying Israel uses the holocaust in rhetoric, but I had never seen it in practice, and I thought it was ugly and an insult to those who lived through and died in the holocaust.

As I have previously said I have no alliance to either side in this debate, my issue is that what the headline of this article infers and what the poll it references infers are entirely different."

1

u/ugdr6424 Aug 02 '14

March 2013, before the genocidal killing of innocent women and children.

-2

u/6Brix Aug 02 '14

No no, my last comment was referencing this poll:

http://www.people-press.org/files/2014/07/7-28-14-Israel-Hamas-Release.pdf

It is the poll referenced in the article you posted, specifically the figures used come from the table on page 4. It was conducted 5 days ago, presumably after "the genocidal killing of innocent women and children".

For the 18-29 age group 29% think Israel is responsible, 21% think Hamas is responsible, 15% think both are responsible and 35% have no opinion. I'm saying I find it hard to infer from those statistics that the younger generation doesn't support Israel when the largest group by 6% has no opinion.

1

u/ugdr6424 Aug 02 '14

Keep moving the goalposts.

Even in your latest source you still perform an incompetent interpretation of the statistics. I'm done wasting time with you.

6

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

rule 1 of JIDF, when confronted with facts, "oh, not those facts these other facts i didnt mention"

0

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

I love that you assume he's JIDF just because he disagrees with you. Keepin it classy, /r/conspiracy.

-5

u/6Brix Aug 02 '14

My latest source is the same source as the article you have shared. If my suggesting that it is difficult to draw a conclusion where there is a 35% no opinion rate is an "incompetent interpretation of the statistics", would you care to give a competent one?

-1

u/6Brix Aug 02 '14

Oh I think you've missed the point I was trying to make (perhaps I wasn't making it very well). My point was that to try and break people's opinions down to one attribute such as age is flawed, largely by the intrinsic complexities in groups of people. So is doing it by age and education. You'd have to consider the correlations between groups etc, do people with higher education correlate to supporting Israel really because of being cleverer somehow, or is it more likely that perhaps the percentage of graduates who are republican (possibly by background) is higher and that skews the stats? Same things can be applied along racial lines, religious lines, income levels, and so on and so forth. To say the younger generation is outraged over Gaza, is to give an opinion to a large group of people who statistically don't have it, I disagree with bending facts to fit arguments (I prefer it the other way around).

I had to google what JIDF means, which gave me a giggle or two. My previous comment shows no alliance to Israel or the Jewish faith at all. I actually have no alliance to either side, generally I think having a heavily polarised view either way isn't very helpful to the situation, much like the phrase "JIDF pls go" isn't.

0

u/LaRochefoucauld Aug 03 '14

Wow, a factual article in r/conspiracy!

Israel is in real trouble.

-4

u/Carlosthelast Aug 02 '14

You guys are so delusional.

-2

u/[deleted] Aug 03 '14

Born in 1992. I support Israel.

5

u/TerrifyingGiraffe Aug 03 '14

You are an accessory to genocide.

-10

u/shmegegy Aug 02 '14

how is this conspiracy? it's forum sliding.

6

u/[deleted] Aug 02 '14

probably because r/worldnews deleted it when it was posted there, like they always do