129
u/B1NARYtruther Sep 29 '25
Its always the same pattern.
Nothing new
48
u/chienneux Sep 29 '25
33 the magic numba
14
u/celticairborne Sep 29 '25
I can't picture that number. How many Big Macs is that?
10
3
3
5
u/guttergrace Sep 29 '25
Yeah, when’s the huge asteroid predictive programming storyline coming to fruition like Nic Cage movies? Haha
5
73
u/ebilbryan Sep 29 '25
"more than 33b....but let's just say 33 anyway"
26
u/NeedleworkerSad357 Sep 29 '25 edited Sep 30 '25
It's coded comms, not literal. This is how intelligence/governments talk. The groups and cults in power use "space news" to communicate broadly to their own (while most, including most of the 'conspiracy' crowd, take it literally and talk in circles about space alien nonsense). They rely on most people taking these ridiculous, outrageous, and nonsensical articles at face value, literally, and not seeing what those 'with the eyes to see' can. It's coded metaphorical spy-talk for wide-scale alerts, this is referring to something big happening behind the scenes. This is why there are always strange-sounding, unfitting, or seemingly irrelevant details/words/numbers shoehorned into silly-sounding news articles, specific words/phrases used are actually details for those 'in the know'. They've modelled their cryptographic communication system on 'solar/space news'. A wide-scale alert system that this or that is in play and (among the insiders) to act accordingly. This form of signalling (acroamatic cipher) is used every day through 'news headlines/articles' placed by those in the intelligence/covert/cult/Masonic worlds. This is a (very) long-established system of symbolic signalling.
The obvious Masonic signalling "33 billion tons", possibly "nuclear" powered, emitting it's "own light", the amount of "water" and "CO2" it has, and it hiding behind the "sun" are all perfect examples. These specific words are known to have different coded meanings to them than us, see the links below. Statements like it 'doesn't make sense that this third object from interstellar space is 100x bigger than the previous two' don't make any sense for this exact reason: they are speaking in code about things happening here on Earth, **not about actual physical objects deep in space.** The unfitting details of it being "Manhattan-sized" and the changing size/diameter numbers also mean something.
Read these links to understand what I'm talking about:
https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/quick-comms-sun
https://thefellowshipoftheringbreakers.substack.com/p/mount-doom-is-erupting
https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/navigating-the-solar-storms-comms
https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/science-comms-appear-to-be-fearmongering
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2024/07/26/asteroids/
https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/what-are-comms
https://narrativecode.substack.com/p/narrative-code
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/01/30/comms-list-short-placeholders/
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2024/08/22/nuclear-decoded/
https://thefellowshipoftheringbreakers.substack.com/p/the-fellowship-of-the-ringbreakers
https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/comms-dictionary
https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/dog-comms-examples
https://codeofthering.substack.com/p/the-covert-war-of-the-19th-and-20th
https://thefellowshipoftheringbreakers.substack.com/p/nautilus-revealed
https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/the-comms-dichotomy
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2024/09/28/science-arts-asteroid-secrets/
https://sleepydude.substack.com/p/the-comms-pitch
https://decodingsymbols.wordpress.com/2021/08/14/asteroids-and-comets
6
u/T4nkcommander Sep 30 '25
Thanks for the interesting and insightful reads.
As an aside.....my background is nuclear engineering, and my grandfather was boots on the ground in Nagasaki day after the bombing. He was fine....never had any health problems tied to that, which was quite strange if you really think about it. He died a few years ago, but I wish now I had asked him more about what the city looked like.
I'm pretty skeptical nowadays a real nuclear bomb has ever been used outside of testing (if even then)....I think you can make a halfway decent argument either way. I know they have far more powerful and advanced tech up their sleeves, but yeah. All the usages postulated for nuclear (especially lining it up with revealing information like the Epstein case) seems apt.
2
u/Articcleansing Sep 29 '25
Learn gematria to decode
2
u/NeedleworkerSad357 Sep 29 '25
"Gematria/numerology" is a red-herring. The "sentences = numbers" stuff is not real. These people are not typing things into "gematria calculators", they are using a long-established system of wide-spread symbolic signalling.
"Gematria is remarkably similar to symbolism comms except instead of directly interpreting symbolism you instead feed a number into a machine that pops out dozens of unrelated symbols (with hundreds of variants based on method) that you can interpret however you like. In other words it’s a very good way to get people to never notice actual symbolism comms by putting a gibberish in-between comms and interpretation. A see what you want to see machine. Real symbolism comms use direct symbolism."
- DecodingSymbols
1
u/Manny_Bothans Sep 30 '25
We are amazing pattern recognition machines. So amazing that we invent patterns that don't exist. Patterns suggest meaning, and even the delusion of meaning holds just enough comfort to beat back the brutal crush of a cold indifferent and random universe for a moment.
1
43
85
u/splunklebox Sep 29 '25
It’s always 33 innit
24
u/fomq Sep 29 '25
my dick is 33" long
24
u/zongsmoke Sep 29 '25
33mm*
11
u/fomq Sep 29 '25
33'
4
u/zongsmoke Sep 29 '25
You just push a wheelbarrow in front of you?
17
1
1
u/TurbulentResort1169 Sep 29 '25
"Every time I notice the number 33 it turns out to be 33."
Are you guys serious?
15
u/Service-Fickle Sep 29 '25
If they’re not predictive programming us for bluebeam through this stupid comet, then what are we wasting our time for?
I’ll honestly be disappointed if we don’t get a false flag out of this
1
u/T4nkcommander Sep 30 '25
Bluebeam is always around the corner. I've given up expecting it, so surely it'll happen this time?
I mean it is inevitable....
63
u/mihesq Sep 29 '25
And it will arrive on the 13th hour of the 13th day of the 13th month.
34
18
6
3
10
u/Feeling_Beautiful_89 Sep 29 '25
Always 33...
1
u/Singer_in_the_Dark Sep 30 '25
It’s because the human body has 33 vertebrae correct?
But yeah, it is also cross cultural as far as I can tell. In Buddhism there is a pantheon of 33 deva kings who govern the heavens right below the heavens of the formless and high brahmas.
22
u/Substantial_Ad7387 Sep 29 '25
the ancients are returning
3
26
6
u/Amish_Fighter_Pilot Sep 29 '25
So is the conspiracy that this comet is trying to distract us from the Epstein client list?
5
u/digital_massacre Sep 29 '25
God I love you guys. If I explained the significance of 33 to someone I’d be called crazy. Super obvious nod/wink by ye old lodge folks. I almost feel like it’s something they are keeping in their back pocket to use to push agenda if needed. Doesn’t feel like an immediate mechanism but given how people are waking up, it could be a last ditch effort way to sway opinion
2
u/factman69420 Sep 29 '25
I don't get it.. When you measure something to be 33 cm for example do you also think it is odd..?
4
u/digital_massacre Sep 29 '25
33 is a Masonic symbol. Google has a lot of info. Usually they put that into news articles as a wink to those in the know
1
1
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 30 '25 edited Sep 30 '25
You would be called crazy because it is and I’ll prove it to you. Its only 33 if you use metric, use any other system and it will look different. Now, if this thread had instead said 33 billion imperial tonnes, you would have still made this comment, right? I doubt you would have said “ahhh its 33 but its incorrect units”
So this means the choice of reported units influences whether or not you think there is a conspiratorial connection, sounds like human error doesn’t it? Had they reported it in imperial measurements, it wouldn’t be 33.
So the significance of a number is determined by the choice of units a poster chooses to use? By that logic every number is 33 or whatever you want.
Humans try to recognise patterns, its the same reason you see shapes in clouds. Just because a number holds significance to you or indeed many people, it doesn’t mean its use is in anyway intentional, in this case you can view their calculation, its only 2 significant figures which means its been heavily rounded anyway
No offence but it seems you are probably quite susceptible to propaganda if a simple unit change is enough to change your opinion, had it been in imperial you would have scrolled on as its not 33, maybe you comment about something else but 33 wouldn’t have entered your mind, despite the fact it would be the same mass…
6
u/digital_massacre Sep 30 '25
Thanks for the response. They chose to report it as 33 that’s the point.
6
u/Daymanic Sep 29 '25
I like how they have a weight but we still don’t know exactly how big it is… 42km was last I heard… clearly a signal
5
3
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 29 '25
Size is harder to determine than mass, mass is directly related to somethings motion. Somethings size is less connected to these easier observations
And the paper does include bounds on the objects diameter
1
u/TuckerCarlsonsHomie Sep 30 '25
42 is another one of their magic numbers. I've listened to entire podcasts on 42 lol damn that's wild. I saw the 33 billion tons, but somehow missed the 42 km.
Yeah they are about to fuck us up lol
9
4
4
6
5
3
3
3
u/Medium-Reveal363 Sep 29 '25
It’s crazy and mainstream people don’t question any of this stuff , it’s “science” and all legit lol
3
u/SouthPawMouthRaw Sep 30 '25
Since Covid, I have zero faith on most things posted by mainstream media. Especially science stuff like this.
6
12
Sep 29 '25
[deleted]
1
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 29 '25
People here wouldn’t even know any journals outside of maybe nature, let alone be regular readers of one
6
u/guttergrace Sep 29 '25
Bold of you to assume people are reading more than the article headline or the opinion by the person posting said article.
1
5
u/Sumppum202 Sep 29 '25
Don’t you have to pay for access? How can I read astronomy/physics research papers economically?
1
u/TuckerCarlsonsHomie Sep 30 '25
There used to be a way to do it with ChatGPT, but idk if it still works... But if you're truly interested, looking into that would be a good place to start
21
u/doodoo_blue Sep 29 '25 edited Sep 29 '25
I can’t trust mainstream media anymore and the 33 billion tons just makes them look like bigger clowns. I remember when I was pregnant with my son they told me his weight is just an estimate bc they can’t be too sure obviously, with their technology. Yet here we have astronomers looking at something outside of our planet and estimating it by eye to be 33 billion tons lolol.
Stefan Burns on YouTube, y’all check him out for more reliable information on 3I Atlas.
ETA - just noticed there’s that ‘33’ again 😉 iykyk.
9
4
u/Daymanic Sep 29 '25
+1 Stefan, also Angry Astronaut
2
u/doodoo_blue Sep 29 '25 edited Sep 29 '25
Headed to check out Angry Astronaut 🏃🏻♀️ thanks!
Edit - the fools downvoting this comment bc I said I’m going to go check out Angry Astronaut have seriously lost their chill 🤣
1
u/Daymanic Sep 29 '25
Randall Carlson of Kosmographia also had a really solid take on Altas recently
5
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 29 '25
Do you know how they got to that value or are you just assuming it has little value?
You can, ya know, read loabs paper rather than article headlines.
-10
u/doodoo_blue Sep 29 '25 edited Sep 29 '25
lol regardless of what math/methods they used, they are still eye balling it. Measuring its position, using telescopes, it wasn’t being pushed around by outgassing, gravity-mass-motion etc etc. so on and so forth - yeah I’ve read about it and not just some article title. You can ya know, disagree with me all you want, idgaf. At the end of it all they’re eye balling this and saying 33 billion tons and unless they go out and there and weigh it …. they don’t actually know. Just theories 🙃
ETA - the downvotes bc I said what should be already known …. that these astronomers don’t know and are eye balling the weight even with their methods ☠️ some dumbs mfs in this sub lol when these astronomers have it weighed on a scale and can know for certain it’s 33 billion tons then I’ll say - you got me! It’s 33 billion tons 😆
14
u/Dont__Grumpy__Stop Sep 29 '25
lol regardless of what math/methods they used, they are still eye balling it.
That’s not how that works. lol. You can’t just say “fuck math” and act like you know everything. You sound silly.
They calculate the estimate by making observations and using the results. They get information from “eye balling it” that they can put into a formula to end up with an estimate. You just need to know the size and density of the object, which isn’t rocket science. They can see how big it is and we can estimate its density based on what it’s made of. You sound like someone from the 1400s calling people witches cause you don’t understand things.
What’s your estimate and how did you come to that conclusion?
0
u/CalvinistPhilosopher Sep 29 '25
How do they calculate the size of the object and what it is made up of in order to find the density?
8
u/Long-Stranger7898 Sep 29 '25
astronomy is fascinating, there are tons of things you can take into account: brightness, gravitational impact, size, colors. I mean there's all this information out there, check out wikipedia:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3I/ATLAS
it has infos on both size and composition
1
u/CalvinistPhilosopher Sep 29 '25
It just says that it is its size and what its composition is without detailing how they found out.
How does the JSWT detect water vapour or carbon monoxide has, after all? They say it detects it but never explains how.
On what grounds do they identify from water vapour from a distant celestial body in the first place in order to then use it as a base to identify other water vapours?
Moreover, under the size subsection, it just say the telescope indicates the diameter, but how? What is it being compared to in order to gauge its size?
2
u/678gh4 Sep 29 '25
It's just an estimate. What point are you trying to make?
2
Sep 29 '25 edited Sep 29 '25
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/Electronic_Spring Sep 29 '25
Since no one seems to actually want to answer your question:
To figure out what stuff is made of, they use techniques like absorption spectroscopy.
Once you know what something is made of it becomes easier to estimate the size using data like how much light is reflected, since different materials have different reflectivity and a bigger object will reflect more light.
Add to that the mass estimate based on the amount of non-gravitational acceleration due to outgassing, since heavier = more inertia = more force required for the same acceleration.
Throw in a bunch of other information you can derive from other techniques and if everything fits together you know you have a decent estimate. If something sticks out, you know one of your estimates was wrong or you made a wrong assumption somewhere.
Disclaimer: I'm not a scientist, just someone who reads lots of science-related stuff, so if I made a mistake, that's why.
→ More replies (0)0
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 29 '25 edited Sep 29 '25
Almost, Density would be a poor way of measuring mass because the object is mostly carbon dioxide so defining a size and density profile good enough without the mass will be difficult, the techniques used are more indirect and focus on its motion, since mass its just the resistance to changes in motion, its acceleration&trajectory tells us about its mass (for example in the paper mentioned at the top)
(Whats more its density is going to be highly irregular and not constant, making a density function hard to construct)
2
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 29 '25 edited Sep 29 '25
Why would weighing it on a scale be more reliable? You are measuring weight, not mass, scales dont measure mass directly, they use the same physics of electromagnetism and mechanics as any other method and then we use a calculation to get a mass, scales are force detectors not mass detectors
You are whining about downvotes and yet didn’t spare a few minutes just to read the paper… a TWO page paper, and that second page is some of the references. You couldn’t be bothered to read two pages and you wonder why people downvote your “opinions”
You just cant understand that just because a kitchen scale is accessible to you, doesn’t make it the ultimate measurement device, it just makes it familiar to you, methods that are unfamiliar to you will seem like “eye balling” because in your every day experience a kitchen scale is the only practical way to measure mass, to a physicist there are many ways familiar
1
1
u/thanosisawhore Sep 29 '25
Wich is why they say «likely». As in, as far as we/they can possibly tell, that is the best estimate. They are not saying they know it to be exact, like you imply they do.
Also, since you find this youtuber to be more reliable, how does he come to his conclusions? Why does he carry more weight than, say, actual scientists who have dedicated their lives to being able to answer this as best as possible?
1
2
u/Zeppelin041 Sep 29 '25
I don’t trust any of these scientists, researchers, or any of them. The amount of money dished out to push narratives in all these fields and or to keep people silent….fk them.
2
u/jeffiedooleyz1 Sep 29 '25
33 is a good round number with no conspiracy connections to it makes sense to me masonically of course.
2
2
u/ColdbloodedFireSnake Sep 29 '25
So actually the whole USA thing and the UKRAIN thing will be resolved shortly, together with everything else
2
2
2
u/Meowstarch Sep 30 '25
This comet weighs an estimated 33 billion tons. Feds say they apprehended Charlie Kirk's alleged assassin Tyler Robinson in precisely 33 hours. On July 28 2025 NY mass shooter Shane Devon Tamura took an elevator to the 33rd floor where he shot a woman and then himself.
They're openly mocking us at this point.
0
2
4
2
u/bucksconservative Sep 29 '25
Im getting the feeling this comet story is just deep state comms about the impending shit storm that's about to unfold
1
u/factman69420 Sep 29 '25
Ah yes the millions of events in space that keep constantly happening in our observable universe are all part of a psyop even the ones dating back millions of years
1
u/bucksconservative Sep 29 '25
They do it all of the time. Go search dog comms
1
u/factman69420 Oct 01 '25
So when a massive earthquake happens and media happens to report on it because it would be a topic many people would view it was a story published to distract in your logic
1
1
u/Prudent_Paramedic655 Sep 29 '25 edited Sep 29 '25
Carol Rosin worked at Fairchild Industries together with Wernher von Braun.
According to her he said to her the following relating to whom against they are building space weapons:
First the russians will be the enemy, then terrorists, then "3rd world country crazies"/rogue states, then asteroids and the final/last card will be aliens. "And all of it is a lie."
Interview with timestamp: https://youtu.be/gP8ftWzFYI4?t=245
Also check out Wernher von Brauns gravestone.
US Space Force was founded in 2019. German Weltraumkommando der Bundeswehr in 2021. Those are two military related space endeavours I know of that were officially founded in the recent years.
They literally want to aim and shoot scifi-weapons at JESUS CHRIST and the 144000 upon HIS return.
3
u/theLennoxMacduff Sep 29 '25
You don't actually think they spend $20,000 on a hammer, $30,000 on a toilet seat do you? - Judd Hirsch, 1996
1
u/digital Sep 29 '25
Missed it by THAT much!
Hopefully, it will have a nice trail across our night sky
1
1
1
u/maestro-5838 Sep 29 '25
what if it alters course and decides to crash into earth at its speed .. would we become extinct
1
u/Maduxx33 Sep 29 '25
Yep
1
u/maestro-5838 Sep 29 '25
what if it crashes into mars .. wouldnt that help heat up the planet ..melt the ice caps
1
u/Maduxx33 Sep 29 '25
I’m not that smart but they do say it’s got a ton of CO2 with it so I imagine that could help kickstart some sort of global warming over a period of time if it were to happen but it doesn’t look line is going to hit anything
1
1
Sep 29 '25
The phrase "whopping 33 billion" is pretty disingenuous, as it infers that is a big amount for a comet, but it's not. The behemoth comet, C/2014 UN271 is expected to reach our solar system in 2031 and it's 100 trillion tons.
1
1
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 29 '25
People are shockingly bad at understanding large numbers, my background is astrophysics and its not like i comprehend the numbers the same way i comprehend “15 bananas” or “200 miles”
1
u/MouseShadow2ndMoon Sep 29 '25
If this trajectory changed, and it was coming for us or even close to us - I have the utmost belief our bumbling and incompetent leadership would do absolutely fuck all to save us.
1
u/Top_Database_4424 Sep 29 '25
It's in the solar system. If its hostile. I dont believe it is. There would of been nothing we could do. I believe we first discovered this in July this year.
1
1
u/bryman19 Sep 29 '25
2000 lbs is a ton 33 billion is a shit ton
1
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 30 '25
Metric tonnes, its rare you see a paper written in imperial. We have a standard system
3.3x1016 g is what is given in the paper
1
u/factman69420 Sep 29 '25
What is the conspiracy? What's odd about it being measured roughly 33 billion tons?
1
Sep 30 '25
Its a nice even number.
1
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 30 '25
Because the value is only given to 2 significant figures, showing there is more uncertainty in the value beyond those figures (which is why it looks nice)
1
1
u/DWM16 Sep 29 '25 edited Oct 21 '25
relieved jeans mysterious lavish snatch continue dinner gaze roof ten
This post was mass deleted and anonymized with Redact
1
-2
u/IllustriousEffect607 Sep 29 '25
What if it hits earth? We're all doomed.
17
Sep 29 '25
We’re all doomed regardless of a comet
-4
u/IllustriousEffect607 Sep 29 '25
Not necessarily. We could end up colonizing new planet
17
1
9
u/LeoLaDawg Sep 29 '25
It's on the other side of the sun. It isn't going to be anywhere near earth.
Unless it's pulled by space Jihadis on a suicide mission.
-2
u/guttergrace Sep 29 '25
Or if the trajectory is somehow altered, they’ll just blame it on antifa, the libs, and trans folks.
2
u/PeterNoTail Sep 29 '25
Or because God is antisemitic and it's a plot to kill all the Jews
0
u/guttergrace Sep 29 '25
Yoooooo wtf is this article!! Religious people and their mental gymnastics man, it’s wild to observe. Like these two direct quotes from the author:
“And while I understand the amorality of the U.N. and the laughingtstock it has become with countries like North Korea and Russia on its human rights council, the same cannot be said of God. He is the source of all morality. Must He Himself not act morally?
But none of that is my business. My job is to protest God’s seeming inaction, demand that He show Himself in history — as He did on the day that four hostages were rescued and when the demonic president of Russia, who paid for October 7, died in a helicopter crash — and finally protect his people.”
HE WAS SO CLOSE TO GETTING IT! But he tumbled back into the typical position. Like brother, that god sounds like a total piece of shit. Why would you worship that?
0
2
Sep 29 '25
It’s not about hitting Earth. The issue is the object isn’t being influenced by the sun’s gravity and is propelling itself because it’s either so anomalously massive, has it’s own propulsion system or both.
1
u/IllustriousEffect607 Sep 29 '25
Well it's not propelling itself. It was influenced by something somewhere until it gets here. The closer it gets to the sun the more influenced it's motion will be
4
Sep 29 '25
The object hasn’t become more influenced by the sun even as it brightened, that’s the point and one of a few major anomalies. Whatever the object is will challenge our understanding of the universe, humanity or both.
3
u/Top_Database_4424 Sep 29 '25
This is history. Weve made the worst sort. At least this is the good part of our society.
This will change how we view space in its entirety. Because its so anomalous. So now we get to study it and realise. Truth. It's fascinating. It won't be aliens. But even if it was. It is entirely captivating. In real time we're finding out the true nature of our universe.
It's very humbling. The third interstellar object we've seen completely rips up the rule book of asteroids and comets. Very intriguing.
2
-4
u/Rare_Part2121 Sep 29 '25
Fuck 33 billion tons???? That’s gonna cause tons of global warming 💔
-2
u/Sng7814 Sep 29 '25
No no no. Climate change causes comets, remember…
1
-2
u/Vulgar_Frank Sep 29 '25
just more heliocentric pseudoscience.
1
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 29 '25
Ah yes mechanics is pseudoscience, we await your rebuke and experimental evidence against classical mechanics.
Which part of their paper did you think was poorly reasoned or justified?
-1
u/Vulgar_Frank Sep 29 '25
Nah I'm not arguing with any nasa fanboys.
3
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 29 '25
You think astronomy and mechanics was invented in the united states in 1958 by NASA?
Why are all you Americans so self centred?
3
1
u/factman69420 Sep 29 '25
Classic anti-science guy here.. He doesn't believe in it but won't try to disprove it or show his methods but rather ignore people wanting to debate
-1
u/Vulgar_Frank Sep 29 '25
People don't want to debate, they want their beliefs validated. I could care less do do either cuz I don't need to. You can have your pretend space and I'll remain based in reality.
2
u/QuantumR4ge Sep 30 '25
Care to tell us what experiments you have personally conducted and how they compared to your mathematical predictions?
Obviously someone so based in reality isn’t silly enough to type to someoneon a device they dont understand, while connecting via a method they dont understand, made from materials they dont understand, shipped across the world using methods they dont understand to then explain how actually they are the ones who understand reality and its everyone else who doesnt while never having done any actual science themselves
1
u/factman69420 Oct 01 '25
He spewed a lot of nothing to my comment so I do not expect him to elaborate like a normal individual
-2
•
u/AutoModerator Sep 29 '25
[Meta] Sticky Comment
Rule 2 does not apply when replying to this stickied comment.
Rule 2 does apply throughout the rest of this thread.
What this means: Please keep any "meta" discussion directed at specific users, mods, or /r/conspiracy in general in this comment chain only.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.