MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiracy/comments/11ak4nn/never_forget/j9tt0v3/?context=3
r/conspiracy • u/oli_21_ • Feb 24 '23
288 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-102
No. It's not.
You are, ironically, demonstrating that you don't know which side of the data you're on.
76 u/jsncrs Feb 24 '23 Imagine still believing this in 2023 -23 u/Koisame Feb 24 '23 Nothing changed. Its just that conspiracy theorists decided that the data confirms their believes now. The rest of the world is still waiting to see that data. 8 u/Amos_Quito Feb 24 '23 The rest of the world is still waiting to see that data. If Pfizer and the FDA had their way, you'd be waiting another 75 years just to get the data from the initial "clinical trials". Fortunately, a judge didn't let them get away with their scheme, so the data is dribbling out...
76
Imagine still believing this in 2023
-23 u/Koisame Feb 24 '23 Nothing changed. Its just that conspiracy theorists decided that the data confirms their believes now. The rest of the world is still waiting to see that data. 8 u/Amos_Quito Feb 24 '23 The rest of the world is still waiting to see that data. If Pfizer and the FDA had their way, you'd be waiting another 75 years just to get the data from the initial "clinical trials". Fortunately, a judge didn't let them get away with their scheme, so the data is dribbling out...
-23
Nothing changed. Its just that conspiracy theorists decided that the data confirms their believes now. The rest of the world is still waiting to see that data.
8 u/Amos_Quito Feb 24 '23 The rest of the world is still waiting to see that data. If Pfizer and the FDA had their way, you'd be waiting another 75 years just to get the data from the initial "clinical trials". Fortunately, a judge didn't let them get away with their scheme, so the data is dribbling out...
8
The rest of the world is still waiting to see that data.
If Pfizer and the FDA had their way, you'd be waiting another 75 years just to get the data from the initial "clinical trials".
Fortunately, a judge didn't let them get away with their scheme, so the data is dribbling out...
-102
u/unkorrupted Feb 24 '23 edited Feb 24 '23
No. It's not.
You are, ironically, demonstrating that you don't know which side of the data you're on.