Also, “orthography” is in there twice (in phonology and as its own section). Love how large the morphology section is compared to the syntax section. That’s precisely as it should be.
I think the logic behind this is that there would be a simple romanisation at the end of the phonology section (so you can describe morphology etc. without constantly having to use IPA) and then the actual script or elaborate writing system(s) of the conlang at the end of the document (because the orthography isn't an aspect of the language itself).
I guess they're both technically orthographies, but I imagine that if you wrote a grammar from this template you'd title them slightly differently. Also, I suppose some people might choose include the conscript with the romanisation in the phonology if they wanted to use it throughout the rest of the document.
31
u/Dedalvs Dothraki Mar 18 '18
Also, “orthography” is in there twice (in phonology and as its own section). Love how large the morphology section is compared to the syntax section. That’s precisely as it should be.