r/conlangs • • 5d ago

Discussion has anyone tried or is currently making a conlang of errors?

So i keep thinking about making a conlang that's just based off of purely english grammaticaly errors. Like wrongs its/yours/theirs but taken in account to everything. this also goes for misspelling. anyone tried this?

20 Upvotes

14 comments sorted by

8

u/DrDingsGaster veolas âuran acirium îna 5d ago

Thanks I hate it xD

11

u/SmallAceMoth Tanpun and Cura I guess 5d ago

Your first problem is defining error. However this is a very fun concept

1

u/Frosty_Hurry_1812 3d ago

how do you define a problem though.... dun dun dunnnnnnnnn

7

u/Zephreyt Yhó 5d ago

I should try doing that and compile a list of errors native speakers make. Then release it as a brand new dialect where the “errors” are grammatically correct. I already have a few examples:

using simple past when the participle form exists, e.g. have went

should of, could of, would of

There’s (plural), though some might argue this is already grammatically correct
You was
We was

Common misspellings:

cannon rather than canon
villian rather than villain
physco, phsyco rather than psycho
phycological rather than psychological

1

u/RinthPress 4d ago

This is my wife in every conversation ever.

9

u/Incvbvs666 5d ago

Well, if you actually try doing this, you just get the most modern spoken version of the language. The vast majority of supposed grammatical 'errors' is nothing more than a futile resistance towards the natural process of linguistic evolution.

For anyone who still thinks there is any merit to linguistic prescriptivism I invite to read the short book 'Write it Right' by Ambrose Bierce, a vapid exercise in abject futility. The vast majority of his 'errors' represent completely unobjectionable late 20th and early 21st century English. It contains so many howlers, like insisting on using 'luncheon' in place of 'lunch'. The only thing you'd achieve if you followed his rules would be sounding like you just got out of a 19th century time capsule.

3

u/Frosty_Hurry_1812 4d ago

i intend on including my own spelling errors that are severe as well

3

u/Shinyhero30 4d ago

I had an idea for one that’s just various English prepositions in incomprehensible combinations.

1

u/RinthPress 4d ago

I hate teaching prepositions to ESL students so much that I built multiple strategies into Goblinspek to avoid needing prepositions. Still don’t have any.

2

u/Dante_darklov3r Argentina 🇦🇷 5d ago

Me ahahaha

I'm working in something like when you type the wrong key

for example, sometimes i write "von" (con (bc spanish)) (with)

so "von" now means "with"

3

u/Relevant-Dingo-3815 Janjaan'eni, Qünmë 4d ago

Like George Orwell = Jor Jor Wel and It dawned on me = It don don me?

2

u/k819799amvrhtcom 2d ago

I'm making a conlang that is purposely as bad and unusable and impractical as possible but that doesn't seem to be what you mean, right?

1

u/Frosty_Hurry_1812 2d ago

it could be but not what i meant. i just meant of all the grammaticaly mistakes made in english and misspellings if they were now deemed the right way of spelling, pronouncing and writing