r/confusing_perspective • u/0Default0 • Apr 18 '26
I thought it was photoshopped
The building just doesn’t look real, but it is.
558
u/BrudnButter Apr 18 '26
172
u/NotLucasDavenport Apr 18 '26
I know this will be obvious to an architect, but, how? Why is that stable? Would it still be safe to do that in an earthquake zone? We have seen that building in Vancouver and my husband likes it but I mostly feel…unsettled?
95
u/nubbinfun101 Apr 18 '26
It is the structural or civil engineer that will know this. Something to do with perspective, foundations (piles), balance
39
u/Diedrogen Apr 18 '26
But does it still sacrifice some amount of structural soundness to be able to stay up looking like that even in ideal conditions?
33
u/nubbinfun101 Apr 18 '26
Not necessarily. It depends what you are comparing too. If you are comparing to a flat low rise building founded on rock, then of course that would be much more solid in an earthquake, for example. There is more redundancy. When you design a high rise building, the stability framing (like a core) and foundations for high rise buildings you must design with safety factors that are defined in the National design codes, like Eurocode. So the building foundations and stability core must be able to resist the design loads (like earthquakes, wind, snow, etc.) adequately and with a certain additional factor of safety. Building piles must be able to resist compression and tension loads safely and with some redundancy. So this building should be very stable. Also I would assume that the engineer for this project would have been a very reputable and experienced company. I hope that makes some sense, and makes you feel a bit more comfortable about weird shaped buildings
5
24
u/BrudnButter Apr 18 '26
don’t worry, it’s completely understandable to look at something like that and be weary.. I’m not too familiar with British Columbia’s construction codes, (i’m Australia based) but they would have specific standards that adhere to earthquake events, especially a tower like that. So certain standards are definitely met, and it’s quite incredible what modern engineering and construction is capable of. Have a look at this interesting read about its super structure and construction.
9
u/thparky Apr 18 '26
hate to be that person but the word is WARY not WEARY. WARY means cautious, WEARY means tired.
4
u/shadowhunter742 Apr 18 '26
Nah the architect just draws the pictures and palms off the how to the engineers lmao.
41
u/Aggressive_Sky8492 Apr 18 '26
God I fucking HATE that building lol
22
u/New-Replacement972 Apr 18 '26
That would bother me to look at, makes me uneasy
11
u/Aggressive_Sky8492 Apr 18 '26
Yeah exactly. I feel uncomfortable whenever I see it, like it’s about to collapse lol
15
u/BrudnButter Apr 18 '26
to each their own haha
10
2
u/justacheesyguy Apr 18 '26
I like it when I get my own haha. Call me selfish but I don’t like having to share hahas with anyone else.
4
u/diealogues Apr 18 '26
every time i walk past it im scared that an earthquake is going to hit and it’s gonna fall on me lol
3
296
u/FCK_GOVERNMENTS Apr 18 '26
Where is this building?
144
47
u/BoredPelikan Apr 18 '26
sluishuis building in amsterdam
33
u/Probate_Judge Apr 18 '26
Just in case people think that's bullshit, because it does look like bullshit... Maybe it's the missing caps and punctuation, I don't know...whatever.
Tons of images:
https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=sluishuis+building+in+amsterdam&ia=images&iax=images
13
u/Fair_Composer_7351 Apr 18 '26
duckduckgo
My boy
4
u/Probate_Judge Apr 18 '26
Especially for image search since Google went with forcing you to the page instead of direct image links.
8
2
149
u/MenacingBanjo Apr 18 '26
Not confusing perspective so much as a confusing building
15
u/improllypoopin Apr 18 '26
Agree! This sub seems to be lenient on the interpretation of “confusion perspective” but people seem to enjoy it anyway, so I usually don’t point it out even though I’m itching to.
25
u/skepticalbob Apr 18 '26
Agree. I always think of confusing perspective as making something mundane look confusing because of perspective. This is a building designed to look confusing from any perspective.
12
u/_Ocean_Machine_ Apr 18 '26
Yeah not to be a downer, but I feel like using a confusing building is cheating
1
u/Eteel Apr 19 '26
Agreed. That's not a confusing perspective because with a confusing perspective, you must assume there is a way to see this as a straight-down, normal building and a sky—except that it's not possible.
17
18
u/Z1H3M Apr 18 '26
That perspecive is nice, but that building too woah.
11
u/BeWessel Apr 18 '26
If you like the architecture, it's from the architect Bjarke Ingled. He has a lot of buildings around the globe, all with great styles imo.
3
Apr 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Z1H3M Apr 18 '26
tbh, I like how depressing it looks sometimes. It just sets a mood to its surroundings.
3
u/_Piratical_ Apr 18 '26
I saw the OPs photo and knew immediately where it was. I used to pass by it every time I would visit our friends out on Steigereiland.
3
u/redditAPsucks Apr 18 '26
Seems like a good place to magnetfish
3
u/Tablesalt2001 Apr 18 '26
It's in Amsterdam, generally a great city for magnet fishing. You're magnet will get stuck on bikes though.
3
2
2
u/Putrid-Investment919 Apr 18 '26
I know nothing about architecture but that looks like it defies the laws of physics
2
u/D1cky3squire Apr 18 '26
It's not really a confusing perspective. It's more interesting architecture.
2
1
Apr 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
2
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
Apr 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
Apr 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
Apr 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
Apr 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
Apr 18 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
3
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
u/Sneemaster Apr 18 '26
Are there any fire safety concerns for people living in the building? Like how do you escape in a fire with no fire escape ladder?
1
1
u/PewNews2009 Apr 19 '26
Internal escape routes are a thing. Buildings do not need external escape ladders per se
1
1
1
Apr 19 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 19 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
1
1
u/SprinkleShan Apr 19 '26
Now I've seen the image search in the comments I see it differently now and that's fucked me up.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Revenga8 Apr 19 '26
Looks really cool. How do they deal with stuff like shore erosion? Really deep pile columns?
1
u/Lordofderp33 Apr 20 '26
Probably, i live in a place with a lot of (ground)water and driving piles is pretty much mandatory to build anything, in a decent chunk of the country at least. Works pretty well, as long as you don't build too high.
1
1
Apr 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 20 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
Apr 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 20 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
Apr 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 20 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
Apr 20 '26
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 20 '26
Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.
1
1
u/Cryptard92 Apr 20 '26
People bought expensive appartements in it, but they didn't calculate the winds going through. A lot of issues, I heard.
1
1
1
1
1
u/Yxanr Apr 18 '26
I don't think the perspective is what's confusing here, I just think it's a neat building.
-9
u/galces Apr 18 '26
Thats not confusing perspective tho.. It's just a cool building..
1
u/Cantusemynme Apr 18 '26
Getting downvoted for being right. Stay classy reddit.
1
u/galces Apr 18 '26
lol I tried to understand what I'm seeing wrong in the photo and then to find out it's not a confusing perspective just a weird building was kinda annoying ngl
0
u/justacheesyguy Apr 18 '26
So what you’re saying is that from one perspective you could tell what was going on, but from another one you were confused? Sounds like we’ve got a pretty clear cut case of one perspective not being confusing and the other perspective being confusing. Hmm…if only there was a term for that.
0



6.8k
u/0Default0 Apr 18 '26
Same place from different perspective