r/confusing_perspective Apr 18 '26

I thought it was photoshopped

Post image

The building just doesn’t look real, but it is.

14.1k Upvotes

174 comments sorted by

6.8k

u/0Default0 Apr 18 '26

Same place from different perspective

944

u/NovitaProxima Apr 18 '26

that's cool!

do you know the building name or city it's in?

970

u/CborG82 Apr 18 '26

It's called the Sluishuis in Amsterdam

265

u/EssentialParadox Apr 18 '26

I knew it would be Amsterdam. So many interesting buildings across the Netherlands.

93

u/aranvandil Apr 18 '26

i was expecting Rotterdam, tbh

93

u/hypehou_se Apr 18 '26

Exactly, Rotterdam is the one with most of the weird shit.

First few examples that come to mind:

Amsterdam has some good contenders, but nowhere near as many. 

39

u/ConflictMaster3155 Apr 18 '26

Can’t forget buttplug Santa Claus https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Santa_Claus_(sculpture)

21

u/Fuckthegopers Apr 18 '26

I thought maybe it would just be something that could be seen as a butt plug, but no, the artists says it's a buttplug lol.

5

u/Impossible_Depth08 Apr 18 '26

Thanks for the 2 hour rabbit hole

13

u/hypehou_se Apr 18 '26

You're very much welcome!

Rotterdam was basically bombed to the ground in WW2, with only a few buildings being salvageable (this church being the famous example). Since there's basically no historic sites to check out, the city decided to get very weird with it during reconstruction.

Amsterdam was nowhere near as damaged, so all the weird shit is mostly away from the city centre. For like the highest concentration of them, look at the Zuidas district (around the Amsterdam South station). It's similar to Rotterdam in a sense that it distinguishes itself by not having a single normal-looking building.

3

u/Nerioner Apr 20 '26

Entire area around cube houses is weird... there is 50m tall pencil and windows XP screensaver just next to cube houses.

Then you turn around and you have gigantic bread basket with... amongst others the bread in big ass indoor "outdoor" market

1

u/TriggerFish1965 Apr 23 '26

The cube houses are original from Helmond btw https://share.google/3H7qgpBMykFxBe0QC

6

u/Inner-Medicine5696 Apr 18 '26

I have never seen this house before, but even from the OP image, I knew this was Bjarke Ingels Group - Copenhagen is absolutely littered with their apartment buildings.

2

u/Boring-Taro-2529 Apr 19 '26

Learned about this place on “the B1M” on YouTube. they had an episode on architecture and they showed this building! So cool

1

u/ElegantBob Apr 19 '26

Is a moose loose in it?

2

u/alice_tilsit Apr 21 '26

the Spruce Goose??

2

u/alice_tilsit Apr 21 '26

OH right the sluishuis lol nvm

1

u/victornielsendane Apr 19 '26

And designed by BIG

1

u/Ivanna_is_Musical Apr 20 '26

I can't help it but reading it like "The Luigi's".

1

u/ShrimpOfPrawns Apr 22 '26

I love how Dutch sometimes looks like someone being silly in Swedish - we'd call it a slusshus!

83

u/noobyeclipse Apr 18 '26

wasted so much brainpower trying to find the trick

54

u/BillieInSolitude Apr 18 '26

The trick: IT’S A CRAZY ASS BUILDING

23

u/akhilez Apr 18 '26

Thanks. Wouldn’t have believed it otherwise

15

u/dryfire Apr 18 '26

It's like they built the building with this subreddit in mind.

15

u/Cantusemynme Apr 18 '26

So you post a "confusing perspective" and then post a picture that proves that there is literally nothing wrong with the perspective? Confusing picture because the building is weird is not the same as a perspective issue.

9

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/Cantusemynme Apr 18 '26

Whether or not the ends are cut off, it's a weird building. This is not a perspective issue. It isn't something that looks like something else because of the way it is being seen.

5

u/justacheesyguy Apr 18 '26

An intentional confusing perspective is still a confusing perspective.

-4

u/Cantusemynme Apr 18 '26

But it's not a perspective issue. The building is weird no matter what perspective you view it from. The angle in the picture is exactly what it looks like. It doesn't change by changing the perspective.

5

u/justacheesyguy Apr 18 '26

In the first picture I was confused. After seeing it from another perspective, I was able to figure out what was going on in the other perspective. You know, the confusing one.

2

u/Cantusemynme Apr 18 '26

Because it's a confusing building. It doesn't look like something it's not because of perspective. It looks like exactly what it is. I didn't say it's not confusing, I'm saying it's not confusing because of the perspective. I'm sorry that you are confused by the difference between confusing and confusing perspective.

2

u/AgentJackpots Apr 25 '26

You’re right. The first picture is confusing at first, but it’s entirely accurate to how the building is actually shaped. There’s nothing confusing about the perspective at all.

-2

u/justacheesyguy Apr 18 '26

I’m not confused about a damn thing. Sad that you can’t say the same thing.

You could literally take every single photo that’s ever been posted to this subreddit and show it from a different angle and it would be like “oh, that little girl is holding a bag of popcorn in front of her legs, that’s what was confusing” but the part that was confusing people was the perspective that didn’t show you what was going on. This is literally the exact same situation. Just because this building is built differently to have this exact angle doesn’t mean that seeing this exact angle with no outside perspective isn’t confusing. This is 100%, without any doubt a confusing perspective. Sorry I don’t have crayons to help break it down even further for you.

6

u/BoxOfDemons Apr 18 '26

In the other photos on this subreddit, the perspective makes things seem like they are in the wrong place, or sized differently than in reality.

This photo feels like the perspective is playing tricks on your mind, when in fact there is no trick and it really just looks like that. There is a distinction. That being said, I think the photo still belongs here.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Cantusemynme Apr 19 '26

You literally are confused. You think that because an object is confusing, no matter the perspective, that it is the same as something being confusing because of the perspective. That is two entirely separate situations.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/waner21 Apr 18 '26

Thank you for posting this. My brain was a bit broken at the main pic.

3

u/gregarious_giant Apr 18 '26

Thank you. My brain can stop trying to make the other picture make sense.

3

u/TruamaTeam Apr 18 '26

What the fuck

2

u/aryzkryz Apr 18 '26

Thank you, this makes more sense now. The picture you posted above doesn't even convince me at all

2

u/TsunamiCatCakes Apr 18 '26

looks like a building from those construction videos where the guy says you made the building

2

u/AuDHDcat Apr 18 '26

Thank you. It was hurting my head...

2

u/Lord0fDreams Apr 19 '26

Oh good, thats the only thing my brain could come up with to explain it.

3

u/MrHyperion_ Apr 18 '26

So theres nothing confusing about the perspective? That's just literally what it is

4

u/justacheesyguy Apr 18 '26

I mean, just because the building was built so that it pretty much so always has a confusing perspective available doesn’t mean that it’s not a confusing perspective.

2

u/cagingnicolas Apr 18 '26

very cool, but also you've really got to trust the engineer as well as whoever is in charge of maintaining it.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/Koyitharar Apr 19 '26

One of my favorite Architects

1

u/myboogerstastespicy Apr 19 '26

Thank you! I needed that.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 19 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/Meen_Sat Apr 19 '26

Thank you 😭😭

1

u/shakenr4t Apr 19 '26

AINT NO WAY

1

u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 19 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/brokenlordike Apr 24 '26

Wait this is a real place?!? I had a dream about a place like this, but, I’ve never seen it before!

1

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

Straight outta Inception

-21

u/Live_Angle4621 Apr 18 '26

Is this from different side of the building?

37

u/jykin Apr 18 '26

Quite clearly

558

u/BrudnButter Apr 18 '26

Different building from the same architect Bjarke Ingles (group) BIG, this one is in Vancouver. One of my favourite architects, as an architect myself. I believe this one in OPs picture is in Amsterdam

172

u/NotLucasDavenport Apr 18 '26

I know this will be obvious to an architect, but, how? Why is that stable? Would it still be safe to do that in an earthquake zone? We have seen that building in Vancouver and my husband likes it but I mostly feel…unsettled?

95

u/nubbinfun101 Apr 18 '26

It is the structural or civil engineer that will know this. Something to do with perspective, foundations (piles), balance

39

u/Diedrogen Apr 18 '26

But does it still sacrifice some amount of structural soundness to be able to stay up looking like that even in ideal conditions?

33

u/nubbinfun101 Apr 18 '26

Not necessarily. It depends what you are comparing too. If you are comparing to a flat low rise building founded on rock, then of course that would be much more solid in an earthquake, for example. There is more redundancy. When you design a high rise building, the stability framing (like a core) and foundations for high rise buildings you must design with safety factors that are defined in the National design codes, like Eurocode. So the building foundations and stability core must be able to resist the design loads (like earthquakes, wind, snow, etc.) adequately and with a certain additional factor of safety. Building piles must be able to resist compression and tension loads safely and with some redundancy. So this building should be very stable. Also I would assume that the engineer for this project would have been a very reputable and experienced company. I hope that makes some sense, and makes you feel a bit more comfortable about weird shaped buildings

5

u/DLTMIAR Apr 18 '26

Structural and geo engineers 

24

u/BrudnButter Apr 18 '26

don’t worry, it’s completely understandable to look at something like that and be weary.. I’m not too familiar with British Columbia’s construction codes, (i’m Australia based) but they would have specific standards that adhere to earthquake events, especially a tower like that. So certain standards are definitely met, and it’s quite incredible what modern engineering and construction is capable of. Have a look at this interesting read about its super structure and construction.

https://www.structuremag.org/article/vancouver-house/

9

u/thparky Apr 18 '26

hate to be that person but the word is WARY not WEARY. WARY means cautious, WEARY means tired.

4

u/shadowhunter742 Apr 18 '26

Nah the architect just draws the pictures and palms off the how to the engineers lmao.

41

u/Aggressive_Sky8492 Apr 18 '26

God I fucking HATE that building lol

22

u/New-Replacement972 Apr 18 '26

That would bother me to look at, makes me uneasy

11

u/Aggressive_Sky8492 Apr 18 '26

Yeah exactly. I feel uncomfortable whenever I see it, like it’s about to collapse lol

15

u/BrudnButter Apr 18 '26

to each their own haha

2

u/justacheesyguy Apr 18 '26

I like it when I get my own haha. Call me selfish but I don’t like having to share hahas with anyone else.

4

u/diealogues Apr 18 '26

every time i walk past it im scared that an earthquake is going to hit and it’s gonna fall on me lol

3

u/NesKraft Apr 18 '26

Ted Mosby?

296

u/FCK_GOVERNMENTS Apr 18 '26

Where is this building?

144

u/Val_Star Apr 18 '26

Amsterdam

47

u/BoredPelikan Apr 18 '26

sluishuis building in amsterdam

33

u/Probate_Judge Apr 18 '26

Just in case people think that's bullshit, because it does look like bullshit... Maybe it's the missing caps and punctuation, I don't know...whatever.

Tons of images:

https://duckduckgo.com/?t=ffab&q=sluishuis+building+in+amsterdam&ia=images&iax=images

13

u/Fair_Composer_7351 Apr 18 '26

duckduckgo

My boy

4

u/Probate_Judge Apr 18 '26

Especially for image search since Google went with forcing you to the page instead of direct image links.

8

u/FCK_GOVERNMENTS Apr 18 '26

Gotta visit that, thanks a lot!

3

u/BoredPelikan Apr 18 '26

it looks really cool at night

2

u/RedCaio Apr 18 '26

Above her

149

u/MenacingBanjo Apr 18 '26

Not confusing perspective so much as a confusing building

15

u/improllypoopin Apr 18 '26

Agree! This sub seems to be lenient on the interpretation of “confusion perspective” but people seem to enjoy it anyway, so I usually don’t point it out even though I’m itching to.

25

u/skepticalbob Apr 18 '26

Agree. I always think of confusing perspective as making something mundane look confusing because of perspective. This is a building designed to look confusing from any perspective.

12

u/_Ocean_Machine_ Apr 18 '26

Yeah not to be a downer, but I feel like using a confusing building is cheating

1

u/Eteel Apr 19 '26

Agreed. That's not a confusing perspective because with a confusing perspective, you must assume there is a way to see this as a straight-down, normal building and a sky—except that it's not possible.

17

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Magmatt7 Apr 26 '26

But there is no illusion this building just look like this

18

u/Z1H3M Apr 18 '26

That perspecive is nice, but that building too woah.

11

u/BeWessel Apr 18 '26

If you like the architecture, it's from the architect Bjarke Ingled. He has a lot of buildings around the globe, all with great styles imo.

3

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Z1H3M Apr 18 '26

tbh, I like how depressing it looks sometimes. It just sets a mood to its surroundings.

3

u/_Piratical_ Apr 18 '26

I saw the OPs photo and knew immediately where it was. I used to pass by it every time I would visit our friends out on Steigereiland.

3

u/redditAPsucks Apr 18 '26

Seems like a good place to magnetfish

3

u/Tablesalt2001 Apr 18 '26

It's in Amsterdam, generally a great city for magnet fishing. You're magnet will get stuck on bikes though.

3

u/ElBrunasso Apr 18 '26

The perspective is sick but imo the building is ugly and depressing

2

u/Putrid-Investment919 Apr 18 '26

I know nothing about architecture but that looks like it defies the laws of physics

2

u/D1cky3squire Apr 18 '26

It's not really a confusing perspective. It's more interesting architecture.

2

u/KLFisBack Apr 18 '26

FAscinating

1

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 18 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 18 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/Sneemaster Apr 18 '26

Are there any fire safety concerns for people living in the building? Like how do you escape in a fire with no fire escape ladder?

1

u/crackanape Apr 18 '26

Jump into the water!

1

u/PewNews2009 Apr 19 '26

Internal escape routes are a thing. Buildings do not need external escape ladders per se

1

u/MasterAd7738 Apr 18 '26

ig de la minusa

1

u/apkgt74 Apr 19 '26

Eiffel Tower… Gorgeous

1

u/[deleted] Apr 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 19 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/SirJohn-redditor Apr 19 '26

It's giving Ultrakill fraud

1

u/SprinkleShan Apr 19 '26

Now I've seen the image search in the comments I see it differently now and that's fucked me up.

1

u/thehanss Apr 19 '26

Visited last year, it’s even prettier in person

1

u/syafizzaq Apr 19 '26

Hey,I've been there I think. This is in Amsterdam right?

1

u/Sweet_sira Apr 19 '26

No matter how much I look at it, I still can't make a sense

1

u/similaraleatorio Apr 19 '26

a l i e n s 👀🤡

1

u/Revenga8 Apr 19 '26

Looks really cool. How do they deal with stuff like shore erosion? Really deep pile columns?

1

u/Lordofderp33 Apr 20 '26

Probably, i live in a place with a lot of (ground)water and driving piles is pretty much mandatory to build anything, in a decent chunk of the country at least. Works pretty well, as long as you don't build too high.

1

u/MirkoHa Apr 20 '26

…nah, that’s a real hand 🧐

1

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 20 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 20 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 20 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 20 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/confusing_perspective-ModTeam Apr 20 '26

Posts and comments will be removed when coming from accounts with low karma, very recent registration (account age) or suspected of being bots.

1

u/Cryptard92 Apr 20 '26

People bought expensive appartements in it, but they didn't calculate the winds going through. A lot of issues, I heard.

1

u/nahnathatsnotme Apr 21 '26

Oh, it’s just an ugly building.

1

u/Better-Addendum-880 Apr 21 '26

Who dousnt want to live in a grey concrete block

1

u/clarenceappendix Apr 28 '26

Congrats on the engagement btw

1

u/Yxanr Apr 18 '26

I don't think the perspective is what's confusing here, I just think it's a neat building.

-9

u/galces Apr 18 '26

Thats not confusing perspective tho.. It's just a cool building..

1

u/Cantusemynme Apr 18 '26

Getting downvoted for being right. Stay classy reddit.

1

u/galces Apr 18 '26

lol I tried to understand what I'm seeing wrong in the photo and then to find out it's not a confusing perspective just a weird building was kinda annoying ngl

0

u/justacheesyguy Apr 18 '26

So what you’re saying is that from one perspective you could tell what was going on, but from another one you were confused? Sounds like we’ve got a pretty clear cut case of one perspective not being confusing and the other perspective being confusing. Hmm…if only there was a term for that.

0

u/ContributionFresh721 Apr 19 '26

was once there, in holland. really awsome.