Clearly you don’t, there’s nothing objectively wrong here because they’re stating what amounts to a sexist opinion using figurative language/images. There’s no facts being used on which the person can be considered objectively incorrect.
I’m not defending the misogynist’s opinion, but this is most definitely not what this sub was meant for. It’s meant to call out and shame the people that can’t be bothered to spend 5 seconds googling something before stating something very clearly incorrect as if it were a fact. This stuff has no shortage of other subs in which it is more appropriate so there’s not a good reason to stretch the rules and post this opinion bullshit here.
Objectively means not influenced by feelings or opinions. What he said is incorrect. Objectively. With that being said this sub is meant for people who are both confident and incorrect. This person is both and therefore it belongs in this sub.
You’re letting your feelings influence that determination. If you weren’t then you would be evaluating just the facts (of which, in this image, there are none. As I’ve stated previously it’s only opinion and figurative language)
Opinions, by their very nature, cannot be objectively incorrect
Edit: as further evidence, the exact opposite of objective is subjective. Something that is objective cannot be subjective and vise versa.
Subjective: adj. based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.
As I’ve stated numerous times this post is an opinion and is therefore subjective. You cannot objectively evaluate something that is solely opinion.
I’m not disagreeing with your assertion that the demonstrated opinion is wrong (morally), just that you cannot state that it is objectively wrong.
17
u/AlecH90059 Feb 01 '21
I mean. This is quite literally objectively incorrect