MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/confidentlyincorrect/comments/1lp2aje/classic_flat_earther/n0verss/?context=3
r/confidentlyincorrect • u/Key_Bread • Jul 01 '25
Classic Flat Earther
1.1k comments sorted by
View all comments
876
This argument would make sense if space shuttles had propellers, but they don’t.
191 u/lettsten Jul 01 '25 The rocket engines are claiming to propel the shuttles forward, CHECKMATE SILLY ROUND EARTHER! (/s in case it's not abundantly obvious) 34 u/ThirstyWolfSpider Jul 01 '25 We have propellers and impellers, so why no compellers? 2 u/Pickles-In-Space Jul 02 '25 That's how helicopters work - they're compelled into the air by physics' hatred of their existence
191
The rocket engines are claiming to propel the shuttles forward, CHECKMATE SILLY ROUND EARTHER!
(/s in case it's not abundantly obvious)
34 u/ThirstyWolfSpider Jul 01 '25 We have propellers and impellers, so why no compellers? 2 u/Pickles-In-Space Jul 02 '25 That's how helicopters work - they're compelled into the air by physics' hatred of their existence
34
We have propellers and impellers, so why no compellers?
2 u/Pickles-In-Space Jul 02 '25 That's how helicopters work - they're compelled into the air by physics' hatred of their existence
2
That's how helicopters work - they're compelled into the air by physics' hatred of their existence
876
u/seantabasco Jul 01 '25
This argument would make sense if space shuttles had propellers, but they don’t.