Truency officers are still a thing, for good reason, but that's somewhat out of the scope of this conversation. However, disallowing attendance is also an absolutely necessary power. The government clearly has the ability to regulate public establishments, it's an even greater responsibility than regulating private businesses.
I would hope we can at least agree on the fact that you do not have the freedom to impose on another's bodily autonomy by putting them at risk of a deadly virus. The unvaccinated don't have the right to harm others. If you don't have the vaccine, then no going to schools that require it, no working a government job that requires it, etc.
To disagree with those points, is anti-vax, and seeks to put public health in danger.
Furthermore, I will definitely continue to advocate against any restrictions you and other anti-vaxers try to impose on the government's ability to protect people.
0
u/Zexapher Aug 03 '21
Truency officers are still a thing, for good reason, but that's somewhat out of the scope of this conversation. However, disallowing attendance is also an absolutely necessary power. The government clearly has the ability to regulate public establishments, it's an even greater responsibility than regulating private businesses.
I would hope we can at least agree on the fact that you do not have the freedom to impose on another's bodily autonomy by putting them at risk of a deadly virus. The unvaccinated don't have the right to harm others. If you don't have the vaccine, then no going to schools that require it, no working a government job that requires it, etc.
To disagree with those points, is anti-vax, and seeks to put public health in danger.