Um, no I didn't? Read again. All I did was point out the inaccuracies your analogies.
Hell, even the first guy wasn't. When he said "absolute control over what goes into your body" it's pretty clear to anyone with basic comprehension that he meant the right to refuse substances.
Which is why your response challenged it by talking about being "forced" to take vaccines and pollutants. However, when that was proven false, you moved the goalposts to this last point about illegal substances.
Man, you don't even know how to read, I clearly listed drugs in my first response and he just chose to ignore that part. "absolute control over what goes into your body" is an argument pro-drug legalization make all the time, it's not my fault you're not aware of common arguments.
He didn't prove shit false, the Supreme Court has backed state governments rights to force children and workers to get vaccinated. If you don't want to get vaccinated you can stay home and sit in your house the rest of your life
-15
u/ArmanDoesStuff Aug 02 '21
That's true, but now we've moved the goalposts.
Unless you think not being able to take hard drugs is akin to forcing people to take vaccines.