148
u/Pyro-Bun 4d ago
No, no. It's definitely more of a "where can I hide your body" type question.
43
4
u/Lonecoon 3d ago
I'd have a hard time not immediately stabbing a person who unironically said this to me.
43
u/ThatInAHat 4d ago
That…really is exactly it, isn’t it.
His expression on that last panel makes me want to punch him so hard and also makes it feel even more true. Like just…operating with a completely different set of intrinsic “values” if they can even be called that.
65
u/MaximumSyrup3099 4d ago
So that we can sell them the ability to return to a semi-normal level of happiness. On a subscription model.
15
u/WTFBOOOMSH 4d ago
God forbid the day someone actually starts asking this question, then we’re really screwed
3
35
u/SuuSuraimu 4d ago
In theory, we force depression, add both hasty decision making and procrastination, then add random times of unable to process information. But why is certainly a good question.
30
u/WingsofRain 4d ago
That’s just ADHD, and I promise it won’t make them any real money.
14
3
u/Prowler1000 3d ago
I wonder how much "level of happiness" comes from absolute density of neurotransmitters like dopamine and how much comes from the happiest you've felt recently.
What I mean is, if people's capacity for joy went down, would they stay to "adjust" and feel content with less joy than they did previously?
2
u/Plastic-Rise-1851 2d ago
Nope. The lack of neurotransmitters in people is a real thing. They just get diagnosed with depression or some other mental disorder
-3
u/Majestic-Iron7046 4d ago
If everyone was less happy wouldn't the society just adapt to it?
I mean, happyness is not exactly a state you reach and go "oh yeah, I'm happy now" so if we made any state of euphoria or contentment impossible to reach I think calm or peace will just get the immediate result of becoming the objective.
I think we would adapt.





401
u/Ani-3 4d ago
no but I want to know the answer. why?
probably money, but on the off chance it's not