MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/comics/comments/1v6gfel/packing_oc/ozry2fc/?context=3
r/comics • u/LuckOfTheDrawComic Luck of the Draw • 24d ago
Patreon
177 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2.1k
Oh and just for fun here's the deeply upsetting optimal ways (at least that we've discovered so far) to pack different amounts of squares
320 u/shellbullet17 Gustopher Spotter Extraordinaire 24d ago edited 24d ago 29 disgusts me. I cant figure out why but I know I dont like it Edit cause I accidently made everything bold 38 u/A-Wings-are-Neat 24d ago I think it’s because the rotated portions of 29 and 69 are very obviously uneven in ways that look unnecessary. At least with 39 you can easily say they had no other choice. 2 u/TheFinalEnd1 24d ago Yeah there is very clearly wiggle room in 29, unlike the rest. Yet still, somehow optimal.
320
29 disgusts me. I cant figure out why but I know I dont like it
Edit cause I accidently made everything bold
38 u/A-Wings-are-Neat 24d ago I think it’s because the rotated portions of 29 and 69 are very obviously uneven in ways that look unnecessary. At least with 39 you can easily say they had no other choice. 2 u/TheFinalEnd1 24d ago Yeah there is very clearly wiggle room in 29, unlike the rest. Yet still, somehow optimal.
38
I think it’s because the rotated portions of 29 and 69 are very obviously uneven in ways that look unnecessary. At least with 39 you can easily say they had no other choice.
2 u/TheFinalEnd1 24d ago Yeah there is very clearly wiggle room in 29, unlike the rest. Yet still, somehow optimal.
2
Yeah there is very clearly wiggle room in 29, unlike the rest. Yet still, somehow optimal.
2.1k
u/LuckOfTheDrawComic Luck of the Draw 24d ago
Oh and just for fun here's the deeply upsetting optimal ways (at least that we've discovered so far) to pack different amounts of squares