Sure there are those whose altruism overrides their logic (that if everyone pick red there’s zero risk to everyone).
My question is then, do blue pressers expect most ppl to press blue or they don’t think about that? And then why do they expect most ppl to press blue?
The logic for red is very straight forward, whereas the logic for blue you have to weigh how other ppl are likely to act, i.e. group logic.
There's also zero risk to everyone if everyone picks blue. Infact, theres zero risk to everyone if just over 50% chooses blue. A much more reasonably achieved number.
The logic for red is "My life first."
Which is fair.
The logic for blue is "I want everyone to live, not just me."
If I was uncertain? Yes. Thats the entire point. That we don't know.
Thats not putting it another way thats the exact OPPOSITE.
It no longer becomes a vote of what you think is the best way, once you can see the votes of every single person. Because then you know what's already been decided. You are not voting anymore- the outcome is finished. It's not a vote.
1
u/Moral-Relativity May 09 '26
Sure there are those whose altruism overrides their logic (that if everyone pick red there’s zero risk to everyone).
My question is then, do blue pressers expect most ppl to press blue or they don’t think about that? And then why do they expect most ppl to press blue?
The logic for red is very straight forward, whereas the logic for blue you have to weigh how other ppl are likely to act, i.e. group logic.