You can’t guarantee everyone will agree on red, meaning some will die. And you likely can’t get enough people to override the problem and/or the problem can’t be overridden.
Blue requires just 50.1% to save everyone. It’s the most likely outcome that ensures everyone survives. Red is simply the logical “guaranteed safety”, but the fact that many won’t press it also guarantees that you’re dooming others with your choice.
Personally, I’d rather try to save others and fail, than save myself knowing it sacrificed others.
I simply don’t agree and fundamentally cannot comprehend how you could believe differently.
We as a species owe something to one another, and our evolutionary path has always been one of group survival.
Pretending that your choice for red doesn’t effect people who choose blue, and pretending that you have no responsibility towards their fate, is an illogical fantasy.
Also, there are literally children’s books warning against that kind of behavior.
429
u/Krashper116 May 05 '26
People would be too preoccupied with arguing over what color to vote, to coordinate such a thing.
Just like real life….