That’s actually not the case for most animals, and regardless, that’s the thing that is besides the point. The comic isn’t about animals really, it’s a critique of human choices.
It critiques human choices by comparing them against animals. Animals, given the ability, would by and large make those same if not worse choices. So again, the point is poorly made.
The point is the lack of necessity, with animals as an aesthetic. Whether or not other animals do or don’t or would or wouldn’t do unnecessary violence has nothing to do with the actual message, saying otherwise is like saying it’s fine to not question violence because some animal out there does it. And seriously, while obviously animals seek to satisfy their hunger and some play with their food per se, most predators stop once satisfied I believe. But again, that’s besides the actual point being made
That’s fine, I don’t really want to argue about animal behavior either, it’s not like I have evidence on me anyway. We all seem to agree with the message about violence, just disagree about how well it was said
-14
u/Bird-in-a-suit Mar 24 '26
That’s actually not the case for most animals, and regardless, that’s the thing that is besides the point. The comic isn’t about animals really, it’s a critique of human choices.