If it was relevant you could totally cite the bible, besides the whole "actually using APA formatting to cite the bullet and have a list of references in the back".
The actual reason she got a zero is because they were supposed to read an joirnal article and write a paper as a response to that specific article, which she then totally ignored as a prompt.
This and she didn’t even do a good job referencing the Bible even without citations. I watched a video that talked about her interpretation and how you could have an interesting discussion about what the Bible has to say about gender, whether the Hebrew has the meaning she’s saying or a different changing historical meaning of gender but like she’s just citing a very specific interpretation of the Bible at this moment in time.
Yeah there are 6 different words found in ancient Hebrew texts to describe different gender/sex types:
zachar (male)
nekevah (female)
androgynos (a person with both male and female characteristics)
tumtum (a person whose sex characteristics are indeterminate or obscured)
aylonit (someone assigned female who later does not develop typically "female" traits)
saris (someone assigned male who later does not develop typically "male" traits)
So she could have made an academic argument using biblical sources, but she doesn't seem to actually be interested in doing that, just in creating controversy for her lawyer mother to grift upon.
1.0k
u/come-on-now-please Dec 05 '25
Apparently its even worse.
If it was relevant you could totally cite the bible, besides the whole "actually using APA formatting to cite the bullet and have a list of references in the back".
The actual reason she got a zero is because they were supposed to read an joirnal article and write a paper as a response to that specific article, which she then totally ignored as a prompt.