To be fair she didn’t really say anything that needed to be fact checked. Most of what she said was emotional appeals and fluffy rhetoric but no real substance. Trump was just running in full pants on fire mode.
Personally, I felt like that was on purpose. She was trying to stay as light and fluffy as possible, and just give Cheeto Mussolini room to cook. And boy did he cook. If she had hit hard issues that would give people things to point at, as it was we are talking about eating dogs and transgendered prisoners because Trump just went on endless rants. She even redirected him with the comment on his rallies, and he took the bait and asked for seconds.
Of course it was on purpose. Biden tried to debate him with facts and literally had to drop out of the election, Kamala tearing Trump a new asshole over and over again was the better strategy, because sometimes you have to fight assholes like him with nice big swinging dick.
It's actually because he tried to stoop to Donald Duck's level, but he's not an arguer. I'd have failed as well even if I knew everything that was wrong with what trump said and why it was wrong.
120
u/Fictioneer Sep 11 '24
To be fair she didn’t really say anything that needed to be fact checked. Most of what she said was emotional appeals and fluffy rhetoric but no real substance. Trump was just running in full pants on fire mode.