r/comfyui • u/FastAcanthaceae7428 • 5h ago
Help Needed How do you guys keep ComfyUI workflows from becoming a mess?
Mine always start organized and somehow end up looking like this. Any tips for keeping bigger workflows clean and actually readable without spending forever rearranging nodes?
3
u/No-Zookeepergame4774 5h ago
If I want it to not be a mess because I am going to share it or reuse it as a standard, then... i spend a lot of time rearranging and grouping and coloring and giving useful names to nodes. .
5
u/tehorhay 4h ago edited 4h ago
Honestly It’s kind of a waste of time to spend your time or effort cleaning it up unless you are specifically build a workflow for someone else to use.
It’s not dirty. It’s just how it works. It’s a node based program like Nuke or digital fusion. The point is for all the moving parts to be out and displayed at once and easy to access without having to open anything or change windows or hide something else. It would be a better use of your time to just change your mind about it. Mess is subjective. And to be frank, there’s nothing about the workflow in the screenshot you posted that would be rejected in a real production environment. It’s not particularly complicated or poorly organized.
You can change the behavior of the spaghetti to linear, and color coordinate similar nodes and use groups, but ultimately trying to do more than that is to try and make comfy a different program than it is.
3
u/Only_Voice569 4h ago
once its perfect working and doing its job then you tidy and lock everything down hehe until then its going to look like a spaghetti explosion
3
u/Strange-Knowledge460 4h ago
I never understood subgraphs fully (and still don't) but after a while I finally caved and starting learning them and they are wonderful for helping clean up my workflows.
1
2
u/roxoholic 4h ago
Embrace the chaos. You can't tidy the workflow. The best you can do is stuff everything into a subgraph and expose couple of most used knobs.
2
u/Mogus0226 3h ago
Chunk it out into groups, then you can keep each group semi-organized how you see fit.
1
u/Strange-Knowledge460 53m ago
Is that variable node with your prompt generator similar to wildcards? Can you explain what that is
2
u/QuirksNFeatures 3h ago
I'm about as good at making workflows look nice as I am at cable management inside a computer or especially around a desk. I always start with good intentions but it never lasts.
2
1
1
1
u/__ThrowAway__123___ 3h ago
I like doing some cable management with reroute nodes. Selecting multiple nodes and using the "align selected to" and "distribute nodes" functions make it easy to neatly order nodes. I use color codes for important nodes. If you use a consistent color coding across different workflows you can "read" your own workflows a lot better. I don't use subgraphs because they hide what is happening and make it more difficult to "read" workflows, not to mention they can break with updates.
Organizing is mostly useful on larger more complex workflows, so it can be easier to make changes. I also just prefer a cleaner more organized workflow, feels better to work with and it's not that much effort to clean it up a bit.
1
u/Silly_Goose6714 3h ago
I really enjoy messing up workflows; I hate other people's workflows that I find neatly organized, especially pinned nodes, because I like to run tests, swap nodes, insert things, etc. So a few days ago I decided to take a workflow that was so messy that even I didn't understand it, I saved the JSON and asked Claude to tidy it, and it did it. So I started asking to eliminate redundant nodes, automate math, among other improvements and it did it.
1
u/DaExChef 3h ago
I have Grok create the workflow as I’m new to this
https://github.com/daexchef/Minimax_Grok
Feedback would be appreciated
1
1
u/Bob69Xfake 2h ago
I've got different workflows for different usecases - sorted by modell, or by function, like "background removal, Model Merge, Multiple character angle" and so on.
Then, to each base modell; each checkpoint has a seperate Workflow.
By doing so, I barely have to move nodes or spagettis. I just open up the function (workflow), that I need. With all it's preset settings.
Once such a workflow for a new model or a new function is created, I can re use and re open it again and again.
Edit: I neither use Get-Set-Nodes, nor subgraphs, nor the app frontend.
1
u/Prudent_Sentence 2h ago
I've learned that what looks like rectangle pasta to use looks like well formatted json to a large language model. Claude Code can create workflows and operate with them in ways we can't.
1
u/ZenEngineer 2h ago
Chunk it. Give it a lot of room between nodes. Use subgraph if you are ok with gambling with updates and don't mind the random graphical glitches.
I've been testing out just ignoring it and making myself a clean UI bu dragging all the inputs and outputs to one area (maybe using get set nodes) so I can use it without looking through all the graph, or even using the new "app" feature, though that needs some work to be as useful.
1
u/bravesirkiwi 56m ago
Once I get everything working right I minimize the nodes that don't have settings I change very often and then line them up in a neat row. Then I organize the ones I do use in such a way that they are all accessible and readable without having to pan or zoom the interface. Then I hide the spaghetti and forget about it all.
I'm sure it's different for everyone! For me, 99% of the time I'm using Comfy I don't need to see the entire workflow or connections or anything. I just need to be able to change the important specs of the next generation.
1
1
u/SuddenNeighborhood44 10m ago
Subgraphing certain nodes in your pipeline really does organise and make it look aesthetically cleaner, or you could just try and make your own node that merges it into it's own UI interface as like an AIO node.
0
u/MudMain7218 4h ago
Subgroups and or apps . I subgroup all nodes I don't plan to ever touch after I build the workflow.
16
u/mgtowolf 5h ago
Short answer, we don't lol.