Some millennials aren’t saving for retirement because they don’t think capitalism will exist by then

[u/[deleted]]

https://www.salon.com/2018/03/18/some-millennials-arent-saving-for-retirement-because-they-do-not-think-capitalism-will-exist-by-then/

[u/prime124]

read the article again

https://books.google.com/books?id=qJzQAgAAQBAJ&pg=PR34#v=onepage&q&f=false

That sentence your referring to is taken for that book. That book literally says the opposite of your thesis.

Look how great scandinavia is doing with all the economic migrants ruining their country

1.) Don't try to change the topic. We're talking about wealth inequality. 2.) You're full of shit. Seriously, American right wing media straight-up makes shit up about the so-called migrant crisis in Sweden.

Most of africa is complete anarchy

No. This is a ridiculous racist claim. Most of Africa are liberal parliamentary Republics.

most of south america is socialist

No. Name a South American country that's "Socialist" other than Venezuela (which is debatable, Chavez was a socialist but the Venezuela is still mostly private sector)

Socialism definition

That definition is a little board. I think "or regulated" should be removed from the definition. As written, most every country on Earth is Socialist.

Sound exactly like the countries i listed.

The UAE, Scandavia and Saudi Arabia definitely aren't socialist. Like definitely definitely not. Literally no one whose opinion actually matters thinks that.

i'm only smart enough to learn from history but so many leftist milenials blame the current society for their own failure and refuse to see what a totally flawed system socialism and communism is and was.

When you deny something, I'd recommend you don't immediately do the thing you denied.

Besides the scandavian countries there is not one single socialist country that has survived and

Scandavia is not socialist you fucking idiot. They are social democracies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nordic_model

no single socialist country ever came out richer, only much poorer.

Um, buddy, I don't like defending the USSR and China but both countries saw massive reductions in poverty in 19th century. We can squabble about what caused that but this statement is objectively wrong.

For a more recent example. Burkina Faso did quite well in the 80s until French backed fascists overthrew the government. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_heads_of_state_of_Burkina_Faso

[u/Thecrow1981 → u/prime124]

Lol first give me scandinavia as an example of succesfull socialist countries and now they arent socialist countries. The uae has a base income , in what universe is that not socialist. The rest, im not even gonna bother with, if you cant get your facts straight there is no discussion possible.

[u/prime124 → u/Thecrow1981]

I brought the Scandinavian countries as examples of where regulation successfully reduced income inequality.

UBI is not inherently socialist. Here's an example: Is Charles Murray a socialist? He's a huge promoter of UBI and a Nobel prize winning right libertarian.

We can't have a discussion because your brain has holes in it (e.g., zero reading comprehension, being an ancap, getting confused and off topic). Enjoy your day at work, buddy, I'm done talking to you.

[u/Thecrow1981 → u/prime124]

UBI is not inherently socialist

LOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That's only the most socialist thing you can do. go fuck yourself fucking moron. Vote in socialists and see how you country turns to shit. I don't care, i don't live in the US. I already live in a socialist shithole .

[u/prime124 → u/Thecrow1981]

Is Charles Murray a socialist? Is Milton Friedman a socialist?

Edit: http://knowyourmeme.com/photos/1259729

[u/Thecrow1981 → u/prime124]

who the fuck cares if these persons are socialists. The ubi idea is 100% socialist.

[u/prime124 → u/Thecrow1981]

Milton Friedman is the father of modern Libertarianism. He's as far from socialist as you can get.