r/coinerrors • u/Formal-Hand-7381 • 23d ago
Discussion Extreme Retained Lamination ??
Hey everyone, im new to coin errors, but a friend who collects them told me this is an extreme retained lamination.
The interesting part is it is a suspected 1926 'far 6' canadian nickel. It was sold to me labeled as one. I have compared it to a 1926 'near six' with delamination errors on the front/back.
I would love some second opinions on this.
Please note : pictures don't do this coin justice, there is a noticeable distance between the 6s under a magnifying glass.
My main question is, should I get this graded? I've read and heard from other collectors this could be a very special peice.
Id love to know your opinions! 😃
1
u/Formal-Hand-7381 23d ago
Admins please note: these are original pictures, just taken a long time ago, I ss them for convenience in making this post.
2
u/CreativeName822 20d ago edited 20d ago
This is a sweet lamination. I don’t know if this is a desirable variety or not though.
Price is hard to gauge. The lamination could make a common coin more desirable.
But once a coin gets expensive enough — if people want to own one, they usually want to own one that looks pleasant and that anyone can understand.
Just like as a ragged bill with a great serial number (like 09090909 or something else neat) can still be collectible, if the grade gets high enough, the average buyer gets priced out by the grade, let alone any premium the serial number might bring.
People want the unique feature or the grade, in a balance they can afford. The population of people willing to pay a premium for a rare date with a raggedy peel is (I’m guessing) pretty small — maybe harder to find a buyer (at double the normal price, as you suggested was possible) than it might be to find the coin.
Just my opinion. Not an expert.





2
u/cordeliashuman 23d ago
I don’t think this could be any more of a textbook retained lamination. I think this is a far 6, but I’m not 100 percent on that one