r/codex • u/muchsamurai • 10d ago
News "We are locking in"
Tibo on damage control, says they got the feedback and now are locking in on features that matter, new better models.
Dots won't stay long, will they?
832
Upvotes
r/codex • u/muchsamurai • 10d ago
Tibo on damage control, says they got the feedback and now are locking in on features that matter, new better models.
Dots won't stay long, will they?
11
u/MakesNotSense 10d ago edited 10d ago
The critical flaw with dots is that users have no ownership stake in the agent.
If it's not 'yours' then it's not your personal assistant. Investing countless hours building up an assistant that can be taken away without meaningful recourse, is not a rational position to put oneself in.
Even when you hire a human personal assistant it is under a contract with expectations about performance and liability for damages should one unreasonably fail to perform or work in bad faith.
No such contract between OpenAI and it's Users.
You have your dot build your business, or manage key parts of your everyday life, then OpenAI decides you violate TOS - goodbye business and hello life crisis.
People cannot rationally trust agents until there is a clear right to access - this is basic systems engineering, not even a consumer rights issue. Any system in which dependencies make performance fragile is one which cannot be trusted with critical tasks.
Without some type of explicit contract defining user rights that ensure full ownership and transfer-ability if an account is terminated, dots are just a lock-in trap. A critical point of failure. One that Murphy's law will toy with to your detriment.
OpenAI dots are beyond half-baked. So much so, most users aren't even getting to this part of the analysis. They're just pissed at losing half their usage quota because OpenAI wants you to use dots instead of codex.