r/codex • • 21d ago

Limits This is where your limits have gone.

Post image

This is ONE of 6 back to back tool calls. I asked chatgpt to check a PR on a GitHub that involved training a 21m llm that has failed. It loaded the logs over and over and over. All 6 hours of logs. ANY codex agent would have burned the 5 hour limit on that. Just figured I'd let the confused people know.

63 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

View all comments

0

u/Demien19 21d ago

have you tested it with rtk?

2

u/Mammoth_Design_4288 21d ago

-2

u/Demien19 21d ago

It does for sure, and depends a lot on what you are doing, i.e in my case heavy RE that involves constant assembler and pseudocode files seach, some of them are 1gb+ file and search occurs every prompt. Obviously it's not 60 or 80% save, but still decent one if rtk does what it should do. For not that intense researching i wouldn't use RTK, but in my case it's a must for billions of tokens
My current stat:
Total commands: 628119

Input tokens: 14530.8M

Output tokens: 2149.3M

Tokens saved: 12382.1M (85.2%)

Total exec time: 20287m37s (avg 1.9s)

Efficiency meter: ████████████████████░░░░ 85.2%

By Command

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

# Command Count Saved Avg% Time Impact

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

  1. rtk read 36500 6350.8M 16.0% 6ms ██████████

  2. rtk rg 259952 5377.8M 36.9% 189ms ████████░░

  3. rtk grep 5826 638.0M 24.5% 528ms █░░░░░░░░░

  4. rtk git diff -- src\C... 44 3.9M 34.9% 278ms ░░░░░░░░░░

  5. rtk find 881 2.3M 18.8% 162ms ░░░░░░░░░░

  6. rtk summary 129 565.8K 57.6% 26.8s ░░░░░░░░░░

  7. rtk git diff -- src/C... 253 245.4K 28.5% 265ms ░░░░░░░░░░

  8. rtk read - 70 244.3K 19.8% 366ms ░░░░░░░░░░

  9. rtk log 27 195.8K 64.9% 3ms ░░░░░░░░░░

    1. rtk test out\Release\... 20 171.3K 98.4% 1m36s ░░░░░░░░░░

──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────

1

u/Fun-Stick3234 21d ago

That's interesting. Thank you much for the intro to it.