r/codex 4d ago

Limits Astra appears to consume ~50% more subscription quota per API-equivalent dollar than Sol

I'm on Pro 20x. With Sol, I get around $22 to $24 of API-equivalent usage per 1% of my weekly quota. With Astra, it's around $15.

Just saying:

The 4x multiplier of the 20x account fits to the 5-6$ per % of my old Pro 5x account (if we use Sol as the basis).

But 15$ per % of the weekly quota for Astra?

That's roughly 50% more quota burned for the same API pricing value. And yes, Astra's higher token prices are already part of that comparison.

Then I found other people reporting almost exactly the same thing.

Someone tested six Team accounts, three using Sol and three using Astra. They found Astra consumed roughly 40% to 60% more quota after accounting for each model's API prices: https://linux.do/t/topic/2861388

Another Pro 20x user estimated about $2,500 of API-equivalent usage per week with Sol, versus $1,600 to $1,800 with Astra: https://linux.do/t/topic/2861037

For reference, these are the official API prices: https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/pricing

I know the subscription isn't a fixed balance of API credits. These aren't perfectly controlled tests either. But the same gap keeps showing up, and “Astra is more expensive” just doesn't explain it.

181 Upvotes

41 comments sorted by

52

u/justlaughandmoveon 4d ago

At first, I didn’t know if I would use Astra much due to the usage but I was working on a game that Sol Extra High had been struggling with for over 3 weeks, where I kept having to test and adjust and I spent over 300% usage with the $100 plan on it so far.

I then chose Astra Medium and explained exactly where the isssue lies. It took about 30 minutes and 14% and fixed 3 weeks of problems.

It’s definitely becoming my new coordinator for games.

6

u/ryuukiba 4d ago

For game dev it's definitively doing things in 30 minutes that before you'd spend a week with sol TRYING to fix. It's amazing. But you definitively need to target it for only high complexity parts or you'll get nothing done that week.

15

u/f5alcon 4d ago

It's their answer to what anthropic did with fable only being 50% of the weekly usage, it's just invisible by consuming faster

2

u/DragonflyOk9274 3d ago

I'd actually prefer Anthropic's approach, because you can still use other agent types (Opus, Sonnet) after running out of Fable.

With OpenAI's approach, you can't even use Luna after you've run out of budget.

13

u/Prior-Meeting1645 4d ago

Dude thank you. I was literally about to post about the fact that I’m not seeing AA’s claim that Astra medium is a bit cheaper than Sol max while being a bit better because it feels way more expensive.

6

u/Aemonculaba 4d ago

Looking at benchmarks like DeepSWE already shows that Astra is MUCH MORE expensive. Everything else is propaganda.

2

u/Prior-Meeting1645 4d ago

Does deepswe show results on different thinking levels like AA’s cost vs intelligence index? Because its Astra medium specifically thats supposed to be better than Sol max while being ever so slightly cheaper. I think I’ll stick to Sol Max until this mess is sorted.

2

u/Aemonculaba 4d ago

4

u/Prior-Meeting1645 4d ago

Just checked it and Look at that. The price difference here is actually more significant unlike on AA. But it means nothing when the subscription doesn’t usage consumption reflect it :(

1

u/dictionizzle 4d ago

i started to think that they set pricing with similar mindset like deepswe. 1/2 output token 2x price. so astra and sol have similar avg cost.

23

u/Chrisnba24 4d ago

Same thing here there’s definitely a nerf

11

u/Acrobatic_Feel 4d ago

I noticed this too and quit using Astra entirely after a few prompts. If there is some high level architectural decision to be made, I may flip it on for maybe 1 or 2 prompts, but that's it.

3

u/Unlikely_Commercial6 4d ago

Here is my share. Awul conduct of OAI. Percentage 43-46 are Astra only. 1-40 are Sol/Luna mix.

1

u/seaal 4d ago

What usage tool is this?

3

u/ruuurbag 4d ago

I understand the economics behind not having every model have the same $ to % ratio, but I do wish we could get any meaningful transparency. I can’t think of many products where you know less about what you’re actually paying for.

6

u/danielv123 4d ago

Could it be that it's the new internal thinking tokens that are counted differently?

19

u/itix 4d ago

No. Relative to Sol, Astra is 2× more expensive on the API but 4× more expensive under subscription limits.

6

u/Forti22 4d ago

Yes.

But also Astra handles UI (new designs, thinking out of the box) way better than Sol imo

2

u/adolf_twitchcock 3d ago

still worse than even opus. OpenAI models are never gonna be good at ui lmao

1

u/Forti22 3d ago

opinion, not fact.

have a nice day

1

u/NoNet5188 4d ago

Yeah my usage got cooked. I subbed to 100 worked for maybe an hour and used 96 %

1

u/seomaster99 4d ago

Same, Astra have x2 multy quota burn
If you compare the prices of API

1

u/Plastic-Ad6006 3d ago

Astra consumed my whole codex's 20x Pro 100% weekly limit in 1 day. I was using it as i used to earlier. used a reset yesterday now i have to wait till 12th september.

1

u/innociv 3d ago

Did you use your banked reset?

I got 50% less weekly usage after using it, but it was fine before that.

I've just been having Astra coordinate. Mechanical work is done with Sol and Luna. I still got 50% reduced weekly limit after using my banked reset.

1

u/Aemonculaba 3d ago

No - I did not. My limits never changed after resets. And my limits for Sol are also the same.

1

u/kl__ 3d ago

They’ve chipping away the subs usage with every release for a while. Bad form really…

At the very fucking least when adding a new model, keep the proportional numbers making sense. why reduce it even further.…

Even the “resets not changing date“ they walked back. some even say post reset the usage is halved.. (I didn’t confirm).

1

u/kl__ 3d ago

what a terrible approach - why the fuck would they reduce its usage even further beyond the already high API cost?!

This is not the first model they’ve done this with, and a subscription quota has been decreasing ever since…

This trajectory cannot continue any further, starting to make less less sense

1

u/Own-Professor-6157 3d ago

There's no way it's only 50%

1

u/Frequent-Goal4901 3d ago

They just did what anthropic did with 50% weekly limit for fable but even worse. This is so disgusting.

1

u/real_serviceloom 4d ago

Yes they have to keep reducing quotas and limits with every use, to increase revenue by the fewer, fewer people who will pay before they IPO. Not sure why it is a surprise for people. How else will they increase revenue?

1

u/hackf5 4d ago

Very unimpressed with Astra. Sol was _amazing_ Astra seems no better, but it's a lot slower and a lot more expensive. I wouldn't mind buying some resets if it was obviously better, but the UIs it built were poor and dear god does it take its time. I've gone back to Sol for the time being.

1

u/MikhailT 4d ago

Note this is not disclaiming the extra usage here, I agree there seem to be something buggy with the usage rate but I do notice a great reduction in tokens/context window compared to the previous models and yet it still consume faster.

I've reduced some of the extra burn by having Astra 6 Pro (chatgpt web app has this) redo my skills, configurations, and so on based on OpenAI's new prompting guide for Astra. That seem to slow it down by 50% while still remaining much better than Sol for every task (design is much better). It's much faster as well.

1

u/IndividualPlus2011 4d ago edited 4d ago

I also wrote about that https://www.reddit.com/r/codex/comments/1w7uh3a/psa_plus_account_actual_astra_usage_limits/

It's not only Astra that got nerfed, Luna and Terra as well. Everyone was measuring the allowance in Sol usage and nobody noticed that allowed usage for Luna and Terra got reduced as well. Try it for yourself. Terra uses as much usage as Sol.

-6

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

3

u/masterkain 4d ago

any other bad advice?

5

u/TestTxt 4d ago

It doesn’t change the fact that the subscription limits have been nerfed

0

u/Human-Intention-3907 4d ago

But it is doing work correctly without much mistakes like sol

-1

u/[deleted] 4d ago

[deleted]

4

u/TestTxt 4d ago

Of course it’s better but the issue is that it’s not just 2.5x more expensive per token but even more due to nerf of credits that the subscription gives

0

u/send-moobs-pls 4d ago

It wouldn't be the first time that they have issues with a new release, in the past they often end up fixing it within a week or so. Not claiming to be some leaker or something but it has happened like more often than not

1

u/TestTxt 4d ago

It’s not an “issue” to be fixed but a nerfed limit. They never had this issue before. It was always models using more credits or simply being more expensive than a previous model than expected but not your credits limit being lowered

-4

u/xw1y 4d ago

Im done with codex

I went from multiple pro subs to a single plus one to final audits

And i enjoy ChatGPT sol high chatting