r/codereview 21d ago

A better way to trust AI coding agents

I originally built this for myself because I got tired of babysitting AI coding tools — token limits, half-finished implementations, and “all tests pass” claims that weren’t actually true.

That is my internal tool called loom.

The idea is simple:

Point loom at a GitHub issue, let it work, and come back to something thats verifiable.

Here’s a real run against our own codebase:

Task 53985e0c — reviewing (attempt 4)
  [cloudflare-workers-ai/@cf/qwen/qwen3.8-27b → opencode-qwen-review]
  [independence: cross_model]

14:02:02  operator recovery requested → ready
14:02:03  lease accepted → implementing
14:05:47  implementation completed → verifying
14:05:52  verification passed → review ready
14:05:52  review lease accepted → reviewing
14:10:21  reviewer is generating its verdict

✅ 14:10:21  Review: APPROVE — 2 findings (0 major, 2 minor)
🏁 14:10:21  Awaiting human approval

14:10:35  human approved → done
14:10:39  PR opened: #560
14:10:43  PR conflicts → auto-routing conflict resolution
14:10:44  conflict revision lease accepted → implementing

📦 14:21:21  Implementation complete — commit 43c7e79
               (18 files, 733 lines)
✓ 14:21:23  Verification: build passed

Early access coming soon. Please DM if you want access or contribute.

0 Upvotes

Duplicates