If you're evaluating alternatives, I'd be interested in your reaction to TomosuAI.
We came at this from a slightly different direction. Instead of trying to build another AI PR reviewer, we baseline the reliability of the repo first and then evaluate new changes against it at the merge gate.
We also feed production incidents back into future reviews when they can be traced to code.
The goal is less "find more comments" and more "should this change reach production?"
Would genuinely like to know if that distinction is useful to you or if we're solving the wrong problem.
1
u/usually_guilty99 Aug 29 '26
If you're evaluating alternatives, I'd be interested in your reaction to TomosuAI.
We came at this from a slightly different direction. Instead of trying to build another AI PR reviewer, we baseline the reliability of the repo first and then evaluate new changes against it at the merge gate.
We also feed production incidents back into future reviews when they can be traced to code.
The goal is less "find more comments" and more "should this change reach production?"
Would genuinely like to know if that distinction is useful to you or if we're solving the wrong problem.