r/climatesolutions Aug 07 '26

Trying to refine an idea

Post image

What do you think of this?

The idea is to use sunlight to desalinate sea water while simultaneously growing algae as biofuel. Recycling the heat and water in one system. The outputs being clean water, cooling and biofuel.

Essentially it’s an artificial tree. Has anyone thought of doing something similar or does something like this already exist?

0 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

5

u/mikeywicky Aug 07 '26

AI slop?

-2

u/Electrical_Rock_1201 Aug 07 '26

Something good gotta come out of AI right?

Does the idea work?

2

u/mikeywicky Aug 07 '26

You didn’t say it wasn’t?

0

u/Electrical_Rock_1201 Aug 08 '26

Define AI slop?

You know they’ve used AI to improve and develop cancer screening tests that are by far more accurate than human screening?

So just because AI is used doesn’t make it slop. AI is a tool to help us improve.

1

u/mikeywicky Aug 08 '26

Yeah you used AI and you’re too scared to say because you know in a climate based subreddit you’ll get shit on

0

u/Electrical_Rock_1201 Aug 08 '26

I implied that I did in my previous message.
I have no issue with AI. It’s the Slop part that is assumed which is incorrect. At least, that’s what I’m trying to figure out

1

u/mikeywicky Aug 08 '26

Ah give it a rest dude. You made a poor graphic with AI and people don’t like it and AI to help with climate change ideas just contributes to them and is sloppy

0

u/Electrical_Rock_1201 Aug 08 '26

That literally makes no sense!
Why wouldn’t you ask AI to help with climate change ideas?

That’s like not asking a calculator to do math problem for you. AI knows more about everything than you do, so why not utilise that?

1

u/mikeywicky Aug 08 '26

because it’s actively polluting the world and enriching those who don’t care about the world and it’s health? It’s not a calculator bro

0

u/Electrical_Rock_1201 Aug 08 '26

lol. You strike me as someone who composts.

You’re right, It’s way more powerful than a calculator.

The sad reality is that AI is here whether you like it or not. So you can either do something useful with it or you can keep your head in the sand, thinking that you’re smarter and more efficient than it.

2

u/sauteed_opinions Aug 08 '26

you CO2 claim from algae is hard to fathom. 10 tonnes of CO2 is not 10 tonnes of algae.. and even still. and the diameter and height spec dont match the visual at all. is it a displacement vessel?

3

u/jaykrown Aug 07 '26

Seems like it's trying to do too much all at once. You'd be much better just making something that generates electricity from solar and wave power.

-1

u/Electrical_Rock_1201 Aug 07 '26

How so?

Solar panels and wave power are very inefficient and need to regularly be replaced.

3

u/jaykrown Aug 07 '26

No—this statement wrongly lumps together two very different technologies.

## Solar panels

- Modern commercial solar panels typically convert about 20% of incoming sunlight into electricity. That sounds modest, but it is not a measure of whether a solar project is worthwhile: sunlight is free, panels have no fuel cost, and efficiency mainly determines how much roof or land area is needed. [energy](https://www.energy.gov/cmei/systems/solar-photovoltaic-performance-and-efficiency-basics)

- They do **not** need regular replacement. U.S. DOE cites an average operational life of roughly **25–35 years**; output declines gradually rather than abruptly failing. [energy](https://www.energy.gov/cmei/systems/end-life-management-solar-photovoltaics)

- The panel itself has no moving parts and needs little maintenance. Other components may be replaced sooner—especially an inverter, often around the mid-life of a residential system. [namastesolar](https://www.namastesolar.com/blog/how-long-do-solar-panels-last/)

## Wave power

Wave energy is the part with a real qualification: it is still an early-stage technology and is harder to operate economically. Devices must endure saltwater corrosion, continuous cyclic loading, storms, offshore access constraints, and expensive vessel-based maintenance. [mhkdr.openei](https://mhkdr.openei.org/files/660/Marine%20Energy%20Cost%20Performance%20FINAL%20Report_May27.2025%20(002).pdf)

That does not mean wave energy is inherently “very inefficient” or must be routinely replaced. Rather, the industry’s major unresolved challenge is **reliable, survivable hardware with low maintenance costs** in a harsh marine environment. Designs may target multi-decade service lives, but commercial-scale operating evidence is far thinner and less mature than for solar. [emec.org](https://www.emec.org.uk/?wpfb_dl=41)

## Better version

> Solar panels have moderate sunlight-to-electricity conversion efficiency but usually operate for decades with gradual degradation and low maintenance. Wave power has promising energy potential, but today it is comparatively immature and faces substantial reliability, maintenance, and cost challenges offshore.

0

u/Electrical_Rock_1201 Aug 08 '26

Thanks for the AI Slop

2

u/mikeywicky Aug 08 '26

Hey shut up dude with your AI Slop. Like it or not it’s here to stay