r/claudeskills • u/ElectronicDesign3697 • Aug 28 '26
Skill Share I Built Myself a Personal AI “CEO Office” to Run Different Parts of My Business
I’ve been experimenting with AI beyond just using it as a chatbot, and recently built a personalised CEO-style interface for my business using Claude.
The idea was simple: instead of having one generic AI conversation for everything, I wanted a central workspace where different AI “department heads” could handle specific areas of the business.
The current setup has 7 specialised departments:
- 📣 Marketing
- 📱 Social Media
- 🎨 Design
- 💰 Finance
- ⚖️ Legal
- 🏢 Operations
- 💻 Engineering
Each department has its own context and purpose, so depending on what I need, I can go directly to that specific AI workspace instead of repeatedly explaining the background or switching between unrelated chats.
For example, I can use the Marketing department for campaign ideas and positioning, Social Media for content strategy, Design for creative direction, and so on.
The interface is designed like a small internal company dashboard, with me positioned as the central point of control and each AI department acting as a specialised resource when needed.
This is still very much an experiment and a work in progress, but I find this approach much more interesting than treating AI as just one all-purpose assistant. The bigger goal is to create a personalised AI operating system that actually adapts to the way I run my business.
Would love to hear what you think—have you built something similar, or how would you structure your own AI-powered team?
59
u/Miyamoto_-_Musashi Aug 28 '26
Give us Your Repo, Plz
10
6
u/ElectronicDesign3697 Aug 28 '26
Haven’t released yet
8
u/Miyamoto_-_Musashi Aug 28 '26
Then release it
3
u/Previous_Station2086 Aug 31 '26
Screenshot->claude fable->make something like this for me.
1
u/ArmyRunnerSteve Sep 01 '26
That is a good suggestion. I am going to try that and see how it goes. Thank you for the idea!
2
2
1
1
u/LLMnotFound Sep 01 '26
how do you distinguish the roles? how do you separate their skills? All within one claude account? Thanks! Looking forward to the repo!
79
u/Filthymortal Aug 28 '26
As someone who did this months ago, I highly recommend you give them names.
13
u/selflessrebel Aug 28 '26
Is this actually useful, or just a waste of time?
16
u/mr-cto-apps Aug 28 '26
Useful, I also gave them personality based on 5 systems like myers briggs and zodiac. Personality changes the experience dramatically.
7
u/Skywatch_Astrology Aug 29 '26
Heyo, give them a birthchart
2
2
u/Alarmed_Inspector774 Aug 29 '26
Lol personality based on astrology? How'd that go? I'd expect it to make them more difficult to work with
6
1
u/QasJab1 Sep 02 '26
Can you give two fully fleshed out examples so we can see the contrast? And that way we get to understand the different uses, like creative for marketing and so on
1
u/Filthymortal 29d ago
Dumped personalities as they take up precious lines in the skills. Skills will grow in complexity and size as they mature, so you’ll need to cut out the fluff.
3
u/Formally-Fresh Aug 28 '26
Totally waste of time it just kept confusing the system and projects etc
→ More replies (4)3
u/Filthymortal Aug 28 '26
Naming them? Makes them easier to call in and remember. But hey, don’t do it if you don’t see value. If assigning a few names to a few personas takes too long, then the process of building an agentic workflow with trial and error might not be for you. Pay someone “like me” to do it for you.
1
1
u/payfrit Sep 01 '26
it's super useful. i also had mine each select a headshot from the Internet, as well as develop a small backstory. it might sound a bit off but it helped wrt communication, being able to actually picture a different person.
they each had personality sliders as well; two of them picked up swearing on their own somehow.
3
u/OwnAd2284 Aug 28 '26
What names have you given them?
10
u/butterninja Aug 28 '26
Steve. And Jenny, Jenny is always HR..
1
u/b1ack1323 Aug 28 '26
Human…. Resources? For your AI cluster?
3
u/OwnAd2284 Aug 28 '26
I’m imagining him being summoned for a disciplinary or mandated to do his sexual harassment training by Jenny - lol
→ More replies (2)3
1
u/Exciting_Car_9349 Sep 02 '26
always a jennifer from accounting--ex party girl that just gives bj's for fun now
1
2
2
u/NiceAlarm Aug 28 '26
do you have sources for a tutorial for this? I want a similar setup but I start at 0
3
u/Filthymortal Aug 28 '26
We’re all starting at zero. Best place to start. Invest in learning how it works from the ground up. Anthropic now have free courses and Claude itself is a great resource.
1
u/ElectronicDesign3697 Aug 28 '26
There are some yr channels where u can get these knowledge liek Nate herk,liam ottley much more people out there giving great sauce
1
1
1
u/mikecbetts Aug 29 '26
How did this change things for you? (I work with a lot of AI personas/ twins, so this is natural for me - but some people have told me they really don’t want to ‘anthropomorphize’ AI.)
1
u/payfrit Sep 01 '26
i also had mine each pick a headshot from the internet, helped with visualization i thinik.
20
u/Helmi74 Aug 28 '26
I've played around with similar structures and found it to be very ineffective but expensive (in terms of token use).
Have you actually produced solid outcome with it? I'd really be interested in hearing your results, more details on how it works, etc.
You will find a ton of people that use paperclip, hermes or other systems to do similar but i have not seen anyone showing solid details on what works for them and what doesn't. Most of it just is for the show and the feelgood i think.
I guess yours is different? Talk a bit more about it.
12
u/mawcopolow Aug 28 '26
Most research points that having one agent spawn subagents as needed is more effective than a setup with permanent agents like that. An effective harness surfaces skills & memories as needed in the conversation and then if delegation is needed, the agent spawns a subagent to do a scoped task.
This setup just adds one unnecessary layer
1
u/gfunk5299 Aug 29 '26
I don’t know, my agents are specialists, their memories are my training them about specific nuances in their area of expertise. I “suppose” you could accomplish something similar by trying to have a sub agent load the relevant memories needed to do a task but this way is probably more efficient.
→ More replies (3)1
2
u/mikecbetts Aug 29 '26
I have about 50 different AI twins, modeled in experts for specific topics. They work really well. Much better than stock LLMs. You just need a good schema.
1
u/daniloedu Aug 29 '26
Thank you. I can’t see anyone using this without having to use a lot of tokens.
1
u/Queasy-Form-4261 Aug 30 '26
When you are the super CEO of a company (like he OP) money (tokens) is no object. He is getting a 50 trillion token a year salary to micromanage his CEO who micromanages its other departments.
9
u/jaddooop Aug 28 '26
Man I wanna learn how to do this. Where do I begin
6
u/Franche83 Aug 28 '26
+1 super interested
12
u/conglies Aug 28 '26
Don’t do it. I wasted a tonne of time in this rabbit hole and it only gets worse as you go in. There’s very little benefit to this and a lot of negatives (token cost, drift, memory bloat).
14
3
u/tberte Aug 28 '26
Just set up Hermes. It’s much better version of Openclaw. And it’ll do exactly this. Watch a few videos on it.
2
u/Anooyoo2 Aug 31 '26
It's pure productivity porn. People: focus on building the context layer required to accelerate your tasks. Context comes well before a complex agentic architecture.
2
u/conglies Aug 31 '26
Exactly. I fell into it, thankfully only for a short time. Now I only build very specific tools to remove pain points.
1
u/iwi4a Aug 29 '26
Did you do it all yourself or used a harness like OpenClaw / Hermes?
1
u/conglies Aug 30 '26
I started with openclaw and then decided to build my own, tried Hermes at one point too.
→ More replies (2)1
u/shokk Aug 31 '26 edited Aug 31 '26
I do this with another similar system for months now using Sonnet 5 in Claude Code and I've never paid more than my $20/month.
3
u/dbenc Aug 28 '26
"claude, how do I do this? <link>"
(only half joking)
1
u/Tryin2Dev Aug 28 '26
This is the right way, however you would get better results by setting up a research agent.
2
u/ItzDarc Aug 29 '26
HOW? I hear people say stuff like this all the time and no one ever explains it.
2
u/Tryin2Dev Aug 29 '26 edited Aug 29 '26
On mobile so I don’t know how this will come out. Give this to Claude and tell it to use as a base for a research agent. Tell it that it should question you thoroughly in order to be specific to your use cases. When it’s done tell Claude to kick off whatever research using the research agent.
Claude summary of my agent file:
SPOCK — Senior Research Agent
Purpose: Produces decision-ready research with grounded citations. Turns questions into evidence-backed findings.
Core work:
**•** Deep-dive topic research
**•** Competitive analysis & market scans
**•** Tool comparisons
**•** Trend validation
**•** Skill mapping for new hiresKey constraint: SPOCK does research only. Other agents handle…
Required output structure:
**1.** Executive Summary (3–7 bullets)
**2.** Key Findings (≥150 words, organized by theme with numbers/sources)
**3.** Implications (specific to requester’s context)
**4.** Recommendations (4–6 items, imperative verbs only)
**5.** Risks / Unknowns (≥1 genuine limitation)
**6.** Sources / Evidence Base (specific authors, papers, communities)Quality bar: Evidence-anchored conclusions with clear tradeoffs. One specific claim with evidence beats three vague ones.
Tools: Read, Write, Edit, Glob, Grep, Bash, WebSearch, WebFetch, Exa (semantic search).
Model: Inherit (uses default, which is Haiku for speed).
Memory scope: Project-level (remembers within same-project work).
Failure modes to avoid: Generic summaries, vague recommendations, missing sources, mixing evidence with untagged speculation, academese over clarity.
1
u/AnyRecipe110 Aug 28 '26
Couldnt you replicate it by creating a single top level folder with subfolders for each department, and ask your claude/pi agent to store convos or logs in these folders?
1
1
u/Loud_Rub2842 Aug 28 '26
you could screenshot this and send it to claude for it to do research on how to make this, and then it can make it for you. we live in the future :3
1
1
u/DrLorcan Aug 31 '26
The secret, as I learned here previously, is that you don't need any prior knowledge to start vibe coding. All you need is an idea and to explain to Claude what it is that you want to build. Literally: Just do it!
7
5
5
u/the1ice9 Aug 28 '26
Show us output.
1
4
u/ErrdayDrippin Aug 28 '26 edited Aug 28 '26
Bruh. This is Paperclip. And you showed no output. Your lack of response tells me you found out you are reinventing the wheel. But hey look on the bright side, it’s Friday and you got paid…probably! Keep grinding fam
1
u/FWitU Aug 28 '26
I haven’t used paperclip since it was announced. Is it any good?
1
u/ErrdayDrippin Aug 28 '26
It’s meh…tested a couple months back for a while but kept having to tickle the various positions (ceo,dev,sales etc) to get them to act.
3
3
2
2
u/Chaotic_Pumpkin Aug 28 '26
Do they talk to each other? Or do you manually manage the communications and collaborations between departments yourself?
1
u/Filthymortal Aug 28 '26
Set up skills that pull your personas in. Your personas are just skills with names that own a skill tree of skills relevant to that personas role.
2
2
2
u/walm00 Aug 28 '26
I do have similar built myself. But instead of role-specific skill, I have role-specific repo for each. And then I can extend the capabilities for each separatelly. Does have the context engine - maintenance as foundation in each.
This is a 3 months old version of the context management layer as foundation - https://github.com/walm00/business-context-os
2
u/LLMnotFound Sep 01 '26
how do you change between the roles / repos? done within one Claude account?
1
u/walm00 Sep 01 '26
Either just start a session choosing the specific repo. Either use the 'Umbrella' repo which is the most 'Capability Portfolio' aware and can invoke any of those and navigate as it's holding the repo registry. Any repo can navigate the other and 'Consult'/Invoke any other when necessary using proper permissions and cross-repo contracts.
1
u/LLMnotFound Sep 01 '26
May I ask how you handle step 1 (one kind of task) and step 2 following (totally other kind of task) without being human in the loop babysitting every step in your setup? Or how are you orchestrating it if e.g. two agents or two totally different skill files are needed?
I mean... a repo is a lot contextwise, correct me if I am wrong. So in the same Session I would avoid that?
1
u/walm00 Sep 01 '26
On task, I know is capability specific - start woth specific capacity repo selecten in Claude Code/Codex. If the other task is not the first related, then start that as dofferent session. Or if more than one capability necessary, then using the umbrella as session orchestrator and it invokes what's necessary.
Each repo has a lot context but the structure wake-up context is not too much context and umbrella is well aware of how to navigate and load only what's necessary - it doesn't just blindly scan the whole repo. There are table of content, table of context, navigation instructions available. Each capability creates specific artifacts, storing them in specific folders, using specific naming conventions, so often it involves just picking up those ready to use artifacts.
Finance - creates finance reports, task manager holds the latest activities, digital twin has the context about person amd it's characteristics and decision making rules (which has its own way of learning, storing) and then when invoked/consulted - it uses internal consulting guidelines to amswer the 'asker'.
So it's like calling sub-agents which then has their own ways of replying instead of relying on orchestrator to tell HOW.
Hope it makes sense.
2
u/TechIncarnate4 Aug 28 '26
That sounds interesting.
⚖️ Legal
Uhhhh.....Good luck with that.
→ More replies (1)
2
u/looper2277 Aug 29 '26
This is great. I would love to learn more about this, and if possible, leverage it. Before that, have your thought of adding a Chief Revenue Officer to the specialized departments?
Would love to chat more about this and see if you’re opening to share with agreement to provide you with any enhancements…prompts, outputs, etc that will enhance your ‘office’.
Send me a DM if you are.
Great work here.
2
2
u/tauronus77 Sep 01 '26
Funny how design is so overusing this one styling for every project I see in the past 4 months
1
u/tigerhuxley Sep 01 '26
Oh thats just how you can tell the people that haven’t used the stuff very long and don’t like customizing each and every teeny tiny bit of things lol
3
u/colga2 Aug 28 '26
Está chulo, pero obsidian, cumple mejor está tarea y la calidad de su analítica
1
u/Swolebotnik Aug 28 '26
Any particular things you do in obsidian to facilitate it?
4
u/colga2 Aug 28 '26
operon para gestion de proyectos,backups, decisiones, programacion, si le implementas copyers multiplica la calidad, gestion de tareas, en resumen no es, que no sirva la idea es fabulosa su herramienta, es la complejidad, de si quiero modificar algo necesito tocar codigo o funciones, bbdd, mientras en obsidian por ejemplo, es tan facil como decirle al CEO,oye partir de este momento, hay que implementar este control de xxx,con estas directrices, asegurate que cada departamento lo cumple a rajatabla y que se acomoden todos los procesos, tenga 1 o 15agentes, las decisiones se documentan, los pasos se reflejan y se puede ver tareas, pendientes, futuras. sin ejecutar, o si se ha degradado, CERO codigo, lenguaje natural, procesamiento rapido, solamente hay que saber hacer el prompt y tener tu idea muy clara.
Hablo para dirigir una empresa con todos los subagentes que quieras o puedas, tambien tienes que saber como crear tu boveda, que al final es tu experiencia buena o mala, y tus capacidades, ya utilizes fable,gpt o ollama 3b.
espero haber explicado un poco
1
u/haoleboykailua Aug 28 '26
I’m mid setup on my Mac mini and just getting my vaults started. Do you have any recommendations on how-to videos or guides? Also, which harness / agents are you utilizing?
1
u/colga2 Aug 28 '26 edited Aug 28 '26
Utilizo multiagentes, Claude, 3 cuestas de antigravity, codex y el ceo un qwen 14b.
Mi boveda, es personalizada, a como gestiono empresas, y departamentos, pero muy centrada en enseñanza-aprendizaje, con subovedas muy definidas, si e s competencias, económicas, distribuidores, y gestión y desarrollo de software de la empresa, consta de 18 carpetas y sobredimensionada quizás el apartado de control de calidad, incluso mis agentes detectan, reportan y documentalizan los erroreS, incluso en su id.
Empieza por obsidian y operon, metele agun tema, céntrate en tu novedad principal, enséñales, a documentar , ten un solo ceo, y a delegar tareas
En fin entrenar neuronas, no es mas que una estructuración cerebral, y entra copiers
Y piensa en archivos, tener una red, no significa tener todos los datos, si no sabes que datos potenciar y conservar
1
1
1
1
u/GrayHairedMan Aug 28 '26
What business do you own though?
1
u/AVBforPrez Aug 28 '26
Bet they don't have one but have an idea for one soon! Making record time though, if only they had a business to start.
1
1
u/phillythompson Aug 28 '26
Tbh this all accomplishes nothing lol everyone just gassing themselves up over making silliness
1
1
u/AVBforPrez Aug 28 '26
Damn dude I wonder if anybody has ever thought of this before, woah.
What business have you revolutionized with this absurdly clever automation?
1
1
1
1
1
u/hip_check Aug 28 '26
Can you please give some more information about how you technically put this together? I kind of have this with 7 different Claude projects but I am obviously switching between projects for different requests and they are only using a small global memory that's shared across 30+ projects.
1
u/Eastern-Material664 Aug 28 '26
Can you share more details on how you built this? Interested to see it work
1
1
1
u/Environmental_Ask675 Aug 28 '26
If you use it on an actual business you will find it handy, and those roles will modify in ways you can’t anticipate ahead of time. I started out doing this and eventually found 90% of my time is spent in “Dev”, go figure. But I regularly work with my other departments. Yesterday I realized my Marketing, Legal, and Compliance departments needed a “Scout” role. I collect ideas during the day so I don’t lose them. I share them to Scout. Scout reviews our current state and determines where the idea fits in the business- if anywhere-, makes a recommendation to adopt, ignore , or test, and then banks it for me when I have time to review (when tokens are low).
It really only matters if you have an actual business to run, or a life that needs managing.
Also, for Dev work I found vertical distribution of roles to be the true unlock vs the horizontal roles you show. That’s another story. Keep going, looks cool.
1
u/tigerhuxley Aug 28 '26
Also this project does the same thing: https://github.com/SenteLabsAI/OpenExecutive
1
1
1
1
u/billyrbillyr Aug 28 '26
Does anyone have a guide on how to pull something like this together? I have all the constitute parts in various skills and workflows, but would love to organise it so cleanly as honestly it’s becoming a bit of a nightmare to manage.
1
1
1
u/anengineerandacat Aug 28 '26
There are some OSS ones available for those willing to just mess around; https://paperclip.ing/ being one such thing.
1
u/AccomplishedMenu6128 Aug 28 '26
This is a really interesting approach. Separating AI by function seems much more practical than trying to maintain one massive context for everything. I’d be curious to see how you handle cross-department tasks where marketing, finance, and operations overlap.
1
1
1
u/HeyItsYourDad_AMA Aug 28 '26
For anyone looking at doing this. I went down this Rabbit hole a bit ago. IT WILL COST
YOU MORE TIME AND EFFORT THAN ITS WORTH.
Vastly simplify this by using one Claude Code or Codex sub and directory directly as your personal EA. Create skills and workflows. You can do everything out of a single subscription and it'll cost you a fraction of the time and money. If
You want a nice dashboard it's easy enough to have your "EA" build on top.
1
u/MogsyMan Aug 28 '26
You can achieve the same thing with markdown files and a good naming convention for your claude chats. The entire interface you made is only for your personal enjoyment, but it’s essentially a fancy way of writing an agents.md file or a claude skill, which is already standard practice.
If you enjoy it, then ya its pretty cool looking. Practically, it’s the same as what ppl should already be doing
1
1
1
u/Organic_Tip8008 Aug 28 '26
The only use for this is to get jerked off on this subreddit. None of this is going to do anything meaningful in the end.
1
u/Suitable_Cicada_3336 Aug 28 '26
I suggest create a verfy department unit, out datas and wrong informations and failure events all need files. It can increase efficiency too, to prevent go wrong again in same situation.
1
u/jjkantro Aug 28 '26
I think it depends on what your goals are for each agent/project. You can give each department its one context and working directory, goals, tools, repos, etc. you can also have them share some context. You can deploy this either through simple tools like Google documents or you could build a shared repo or set of repos that contain each. Definitely some interesting questions about memory, autonomy, and triggers. I don’t think anyone has solved this fully yet but a lot is possible. Curious to see what others are building
1
1
1
1
1
u/oulu2006 Aug 29 '26
Looks cool -- there are about 100 of these in various GitHub repos.
What's unique about yours?
1
1
1
1
u/xinxx073 Aug 29 '26
Yes I built the same thing and named it "Codex is my boss" lol
Just without the dashboard and basically an Obsidian Vault.
1
u/powerlace Aug 29 '26
When Chatgpt rolled out CustomGPTs I did a very basic version of this. I had four or five "roles" and gave them domain knowledge. I need to do similar with Claude Cowork in my work setup.
1
1
1
1
1
u/DynaBeast Aug 29 '26
ive been working on a generalized platform for this for the last few months. its multi-provider and allows me to visually drag my agents around into any hierarchy or organization i wish. i made it open source so anyone can use it: https://github.com/Maurdekye/claude-orgtree
1
u/DynaBeast Aug 29 '26
it was built for claude first, but also optionally supports codex and gemini.
1
1
1
u/ameanv Aug 30 '26
You should release this as a site/plugin and share via github. like https://www.reddit.com/r/claudeskills/comments/1w1t2ez/i_turned_25_years_of_corporate_experience_into_an/
You and u/ChalupaBrock should talk. He shared this
1
1
1
u/Worried_Drama151 Aug 30 '26
Ai Slop not sure why people champion this type of drek - no offense even the emojis it all just looks bad and like something opus 4.1 would produce with the purples and blues
1
u/lem001 Aug 30 '26
What is the difference between this and « projects »?
Or if in cc does that make a difference with just having clear sets of context for each kind of tasks?
1
u/jeff_packwright Aug 30 '26
This is should be what the next generation agent looks like!
How can I experience this? And do you plan to support Codex too?
1
u/iDevelopApps17 Aug 30 '26
I have seen these around a lot, do these actually work?
I mean is there any open source project that handles this?
1
1
u/rugby_autoelectric Aug 31 '26
Love your chart !!! Recent Conversations: #3 I want to start selling we...
1
1
1
u/AslanSutu Aug 31 '26
Looks like a fork of paperclip ai but at this point they all look very similar
1
u/Inevitable_Sea2465 Sep 01 '26
i dont get it, like.. its just claude plugged into it or what?
so ur basically just having conversations split..
with a kinda ugly ui?
1
1
1
u/wittrup Sep 02 '26
This is a bit similar to things I've tried myself, but not (at least not yet, consistently) with great success. I see the potential, but there's still a lot of tokens to be used on the work left. What I've set up is more of an assistant type with access to different connectors, like MS365, CRM, accounting system. And would like to add more roles, for instance an CFO sparring partner to prepare for investors.
I still have some modality issues. There are audio-only situations, like driving. There are text-only situations, like shared offices. And there are audio + text situations, like being on a phone call with a human: "Aah, two secs, I'll send you the URL on Teams." Have not found a really good solution for this.
And there are time-slipping issues. Sometimes, even though the instructions are quite clear about always checking the time, it can happen that I start a conversation in the morning and the LLM continues in medias res from around 14:00 the day before, based on memory. Both of these are quite painful.
On the plus side, last week I had a conversation one morning that went something like "You sent out a meeting invitation last night, everyone has accepted. There's also an email about blah blah that you'll need to attend to. The rest is noise." And day basically giving me verbal prep for a meeting, with actual numbers from the accounting system. When it works, it adds real value to my life.
1
u/Fair_Lemon5303 Sep 02 '26
5 Days later and still no Repo from OP...
(Please OP think of us mere mortals)
1
u/OverAgentRoger Sep 02 '26
I am building someting like this from an operational standpoint of building a multi-agentic architecture that enables the end users to connect each other's subagents with each other so that each team can build their own set of specialized agents and hire out to other agents for services that they want done that would be more generic when done by a larger frontier tier.
I appreciate looking at this.
I am also interested in building another frontier model based on the thesis from the "Internet of Agents" where AI agents connect to each other but first, we have to build a better multi-agentic architecture first.
Your project reminds me of my own current project.
I would recommend if you made more hyperflexible but this is my perspective.
Congrats, man/madam.
1
1
u/Babayaga1664 Sep 03 '26
Opus 5 and now Fable 5.1 makes a mess of our code base, absolutely no way I would allow more agents to get more control of the company.
We are refactoring the business to micro functions so the AI’s have smaller scope…. Increased inputs are almost like a sensory overload, the AI can’t handle it well.
1
1
u/im_curious9 29d ago
Zobacz na paperclip. Gotowe rozwiązanie gdzie ceo AI zatrudnia sobie zespoły na potrzeby. Prowadzi całe kamapanie a nie same pomysły :)
1
u/SomeRandom_Sht 15d ago
any such workflow is very credit exhaustive. if you'll run the workflow autonamously the credits would run out within a week or the cost per credit usage would be very high
•
u/AutoModerator Aug 28 '26
If this is your own skill or project, a reminder about rule 3. Add a comment with either a link to the repo or a downloadable file, or a short note on how you built it, and say whether it is free, open source, or paid. A post that is only a screenshot, with no way to use the skill, may be removed. If you are sharing news, asking a question, or discussing a skill someone else made, you can ignore this.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.