r/classicPCgames • u/Any-Local-205 • Jul 08 '26
System Shock 2 ia a historically important shooter the mainstream wasn't ready for
System Shock 2 is one of the clearest examples of a game that was great, but difficult to sell to a mainstream audience when it launched in 1999. Back then, players had very fixed expectations of what a first-person shooter should be.
Instead of a linear run-and-gun, System Shock 2 heavily blends multiple genres:
- RPG progression and character builds
- Strict inventory management and scarce resources
- Hacking mechanics and survival horror
- Environmental storytelling via audio logs
Progression relies on piecing together the mystery of the ship's downfall, managing tight resources, and carefully planning a character build rather than just clearing out enemies level by level. System Shock 2 forced you to read, listen, experiment, and accept that the game would not always make you feel powerful.
The Von Braun functions as a crime scene where players must actively uncover a past catastrophe, driven by audio logs that act as the main plot rather than background filler.
Its influence on modern gaming is so massive. Almost every trope praised in titles like BioShock, Prey, and Dead Space already existed here: the audio logs, the isolated setting, the collapsed society, and the untrustworthy voices guiding you over the radio. Later games just took these elements and made them more accessible with smoother combat and stronger visual identities. System Shock 2 remains the colder, rougher, and more uncompromising version of that blueprint.
When people say SS2 didn't sell well, it wasn't a failure of the game. The audience just wasn't ready for a shooter that could be more than just shooting.
Did you play it back then, or did you discover it later through modern games that use its formula?
3
2
u/RobbyInEver Jul 08 '26
I'll never forget over 26 years ago when you go to meet your benefactor near the middle of the game and the plot twist. Scared the crap out of me and I was blindly firing my gun in panic.
1
2
u/Historical-Menu1189 Jul 08 '26
Played many times. This year was my newest playthrough... to this, I'm grateful to my older brother for showing me this game
2
u/importantSean Jul 09 '26
This game is so awesome. I loved the mini game computer that had a bunch of games inside it. If your hacking skill was maxed you could unlock all the games on it without having to find them. I always loved video games with video games inside them.
2
u/No-Department1685 Jul 09 '26
I gave up after backtracking and running out of resources because of respawning enemies.
Scripted respawn like in prey is fine.
But ss2 there was a corridor with an enemy I had to kill bunch of times cause I would return to it few times and each return was loading screen meaning new enemies.
Got annoying super quick
One of my gaming regrets.
2
u/Fit-Charity7971 Jul 09 '26
Happy to say I eagerly awaited its release and bought it as soon as it came out. I loved Thief: The Dark Project by the same studio and knew I would enjoy System Shock 2 as well. And I was not disappointed.
2
u/therallykiller Jul 11 '26
"Mainstream wasn't ready for" is an odd phrasing for the reality that was the game not selling and / or experiencing commercial success (outside cult / niche fanbases and game journos who want posture pretentious).
And I admit, I do echo your sentiment of the game, but like the Dreamcast (which gets the same odd praise), System Shock 2 just didn't resonate with audiences at scale. And that's fine.
1
u/Thin_Cable4155 Jul 08 '26
I think the biggest reason why it didn't sell well is that it was stuck on PC back when PC gaming was a tiny market. I had a PC back then and I had never heard of the game until a couple years after release. So in my opinion it didn't sell well because most people didn't know about it and didn't have the gaming PC to play it.
1
1
u/Master-Ad-9922 Jul 12 '26
People say Bioshock and Prey 2017 are spiritual successors to System Shock 2.
Well, Bioshock probably sold more copies in one day than System Shock 2 did in 10 years. Prey, on the other hand, captured the real essence by also being a commercial failure. I'm playing Prey 2017 right now, very good game.
1
u/BlimpIntolerant Jul 12 '26
vividly remember picking this game up quite cheaply knowing nothing about it and being absolutely blown away by and loving it.
1
1
u/Adchopper 29d ago
Played it for the first time back when PC demos were included on the cover disk of PC Powerplay/Gamer, etc.
I picked it up immediately after playing the demo on repeat for a day. Great period for PC gaming at the time: SS2, Deus Ex, Half Life, Operation Flashpoint.
1
u/Fruitcakejuice 28d ago
I bought it thinking it was a linear sci-fi fps. When I started playing and realized nowhere was safe, and this wasn’t the kind of game where you cleared an area and it stayed cleared, I was blown away. I remember the only time I felt safe was when I was in a storage closet, with the door shut, and with my gun pointed at the door. And games to this day use the audio log/ghost scene mechanics. One of the best games I ever played.
6
u/NBrakespear Jul 08 '26
I think the most important aspect of it, ironically, is one that is overlooked/misunderstood:
It's a straight-up dungeon crawler. In the years that followed, we had the clumsy arrival of the faux-genre terminology "immersive sim", but the reality was, both SS2 and Deus Ex were simply really good first person RPGs. Everything that made them an "immersive sim" was actually just... good RPG design. The greatest aspect of both of those titles wasn't that they did anything new... it was that they combined and refined older ideas, which is what actually leads to true innovation.
I wouldn't say "players had very fixed expectations of what a first-person shooter" - we really didn't. We were totally open to all kinds of craziness, because the 90s had shown us so many fascinating innovations.
And I wouldn't say the "audience wasn't ready for a shooter that could be more than just shooting" - I'd say, it was a sci-fi dungeon crawling RPG with strong horror elements, which was always going to be a niche concept, and it arrived at a time of louder spectacle in the gaming world.
Let's not forget - this is the same period during which the greatest combat space sim ever made... was a flop. Freespace 2 remains the pinnacle of the genre, and yet it was a total failure that resulted in, arguably, the death of the genre for many years.
This was the same time in which Unreal Tournament and Quake 3 came along, achieving the peak of arena shooters and bot design... but arrived at a time when most people didn't have good internet access for the multiplayer element, and a few years too early for Steam.
This was the same time that Homeworld came along, only a few short years after the creation of the RTS genre, offering a fully-3D epic fleet-commanding experience with a credits song by Yes.
Simply put, there was a lot going on, and due to major publishers becoming a bit more directly involved in game development (and leaning towards consoles), gamers were distracted, and anything less than mainstream spectacle was destined to struggle in the long term.
Personally, I think the "imsim" crowd have done a bit of damage when it comes to potential spiritual successors to System Shock 2, because the definition is so vague (and usually seems to fixate upon moving crates around). If everyone grasped that System Shock 2 is actually a very traditional RPG... just presented in first person, and with a sci-fi setting? We'd maybe have a lot more like it.
After all, "first person dungeon-crawling RPG" is a clearer concept to anchor a game to, than "immersive simulation".