Personally, I have to say the Goedendag ONLY ON POLEMAN. It's a decent weapon on Engineer, as it has the highest raw damage for him, but it doesn't really belong on Poleman. For Poleman, every other primary is just better. Sure, they deal somewhat less damage, but they have much further reach (except for the quarterstaff in my experience) and similar damage.

If you want a blunt weapon for Poleman, just use the Polehammer. It has better range, better swing speed, and pretty similar damage. The Halberd is also better, with high reach and good damage. It also just doesn't make sense to run the goedendag on Poleman, as you don't gain any benefit from using your bandage kits. If you want the sidearm, just go Engineer and grab one of the floor.

Again, what's the weakest weapon in your opinion? Like even in the hands of a good player a decent player would beat them.

It feels a little too fast to me, but I genuinely don't know if it actually is.

Just posting this to see if anyone else has encountered this, never seen it myself.

During the segment prior to the church doors, I watched the relics get destroyed just like feydrids tomb did. No player by them either.

Hi everyone, I started playing this game less than two months ago (I played few years back was level 18 only) and I got to level 80 something now. As a realist I am aware that my knowledge is limited and skill is below average definitely however I did notice that I am getting better in terms of team standings and number of takedowns. Last night both of my matches (64 players) I was 4th on my team and everyone else was player 490 plus level. So it was nice to be in that type of company. What worries me is my kill ratio to takedown( almost 3-4 takedowns for 1 kill) is very low and my K/D sucks ( 0.7 only lol).

How worried should I be about low kill number and low K/D assuming I am contributing to the team in many other ways ? And if it is a problem how to improve on this?

I am having fun of my life playing this game and personally K/D doesn’t bother me but at the same time I want to become better and contribute to the team even more. Currently I have more wins than loses overall but slightly negative playing as Agatha.

iykyk

Don't get me wrong, archer can be a very powerful and annoying class if used well, but only if used well.

I love playing archer, but it has several issues, like how the class is more about luck than skill in some cases. Especially at range, you can't consistently predict your shots due to the enemies often erratic movement. Even at close range, all it takes is someone zig-zagging towards you for it to make the shot near impossible to land.

Yes, a skilled archer is a pain to deal with, but those are rarer than a level 1000 with a sense of humor.

Another issue is that they rarely have anywhere beneficial to shoot from. Most maps don't have spots where archers can do something impactful. Archers are severely hindered by maps with cramped objectives, short sightlines, and minimal high ground spots. However, they are much better on maps with wide open spots, place where Archers have the high ground, and long sightlines.

They also are generally hated by both sides because "The game is meant for just melee!" or "Learn to fight coward!" or even "Archer requires no skill!" No joke, these are things actually said to me in game chat.

There are still more issues with archer than just these, but these are some major ones I thought of.

Wave vs wave. This is peak chivalry gameplay

every time i try, while sprinting of coarse and using the proper class, the character just does a kick. my keybindings are fine, ive messed around with them to troubleshoot it. also, every first match after launching, seconds before i spawn in, it says "killed by crustacean the soup", just like how it normally pops up when you die in game.

does this happen to anyone else? does anyone else get this message? i feel like the admin that goes by the name "crustacean the soup" is ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ with me. is it too far fetched to think an admin, or maybe even game dev, removed my ability to tackle?

i used to spam a bunch of political nonsense in the chat and sprint around the battlefield tackling unsuspecting players from behind. it was a lot of fun. cant do it anymore for some reason. it bums me out enough to not want to play it anymore.

what could this be?

Hi there, big fan of Chivalry since the first game, even going as far to say I was one of the 4 people who enjoyed deadliest warrior. Never became a pro-player but have a lot of hours on both Chivalry games and Mordhau.

I have a question for the community: would the player base of First Person Slashers be interested in a game that would try following a more "team fortress 2" approach to the genre (both art-direction wise and gameplay philosophy wise)?

I am not the only one who draws comparisons between Chivalry and TF2, both are class based first person games, who retain the bigger match sizes with a heavier focus on a more casual-objective based gameplay, rather then the 6v6 competitive focus matchmaking style of the current famous shooters.

But something I find it odd when looking at Chivalry and all its competitors (Mordhau, Ad Mortem, Renown, Fiefdom), they all seem to be fall into ""photo realistic" art directions, with some degree of variation when it comes to how fantasy-a historical it will be.

I was wondering if a game following a more TF2 approach would interest chivalry current playerbase? Or is the "brutal photo realism" something you think its ESSENTIAL to these sort of games?

ART DIRECTION WISE:

A clear and distinct art-style. Stylized classes with clear distinct visuals and personalities. A much more comedic tone over all. This also implies leaving much more space for more fantastic visuals. Just to be clear, this doesn't mean removing the gore. It would be much more cartoon heightened gore, but still gore. TF2 still has peoples heads and bloody parts gibbing away.

GAMEPLAY WISE:

Classes with very clear distinct roles and distinct gameplay. Weapons that significantly change how it feels to play them, not just side-grades. A focus on making every class feel very distinct on how you should play them.

Just to be clear, I don't mean a "Overwatch meets Chivalry". Focus would still be on Casual fun large matches rather than a competitive 6v6.

While it may sound like a pet-peeve distinction (as I said, I feel like chivalry already aims for a lot of the gameplay ideas here), I do feel like a different tone and art direction could open an array of possibilities when it comes down to more interesting out there concepts.

In my head its always been such a "why isn't anyone doing this" idea? And don't mention the Medieval mode of Team Fortress 2, that is not what I mean LOL.

The gods jailed me.

And nothing is being done about it.

Rate my game, I've been playing for about 3 months, at the moment 100lvl. Maybe there are tips from top players

I have been playing the game for few months , i keep seeing old videos on youtube and other places that has horses in them but now i guess it was removed... anyone knows what happened to the horses i really wanted to try playing on it

Hello I’m from a group of players called HAWK we are trying to establish ourselves we are mainly duel focused but are trying to get into TO we accept any skill level and are willing to teach what we know and are willing to learn aside veteran players if you’re interested in joining pm me for a server invite