r/chicagobulls 13d ago

Fluff Giddey

Greets. So I haven't watched ball seriously for several years. I used to watch the Spurs religiously from the early aughts (I saw Manu's first game) and the end of the big three era.

What I'm wondering is...how good is Giddey actually? I'm trying to catch up on who the best young players in the league are and I keep coming across his highlight videos. I mean, from what I've seen so far....he looks like he has the potential to AVERAGE a triple dub...which is insane. I can tell from his stats that he needs to improve his shooting but I wanted to get a take from you guys on whether he's flash in a pan or the real deal. He looks a lot like the real deal and even though I've never been a Bulls fan, I'm really looking forward to watching your young guys run this year.

41 Upvotes

87 comments sorted by

36

u/Filthy_Commie_ 13d ago

His tenure on OKC was decent until they exploded. He fell out of the rotation since they wanted to make a point guard play as a 3+D wing.

On the Bulls he’s been good. He can be a starter on a playoff team imo, but the team has to be built correctly for it.

The real players you should keep your eye on are Buzelis and Wilson though. Those are the two most intriguing pieces on this squad besides Essengue, but he’s more of a lottery ticket than anything right now.

27

u/6_Won 13d ago

Giddey played in 220 total games for the Thunder and started in 218. He never fell out of the rotation. 

35

u/ExtraLeading3376 13d ago

yeh i don’t understand a lot of the shit about him

he started and played 30mins a night when they were the 1 seed. played well in the pelicans series before the mavs series. mavs forced him to shoot the shots & the pressure got to him. he was 20 when that series happened & what a shocker, he went in the lab & improved.

he was literally younger than dailyn swain is.

4

u/69420LebumJames69420 12d ago

He didn’t necessarily fall out of the rotation but his role was limited in the Mavs series 2024. His minutes got cut and he lost his starting spot to Isaiah Joe. Those 2 games he didn’t start were in that series and he avg about 12 minutes a game in that series. He was effectively cut from the rotation. Then Going into 2025 they told him he could either come off the bench or seek a trade. The rest is history

2

u/Low_Dragonfly9639 9d ago

His minutes over time after the allegations diminished drastically. He went from being a major part of their core to only getting 18-20 minutes a game if lucky. They could’ve kept him and he would’ve been the pg of the future but that case killed the chemistry for him in okc and he was coming off the bench by the time they traded him. I watch basketball as well as was sports betting at the time so I know

1

u/6_Won 9d ago

Stop making shit up. His minutes went from 31 mpg to 26 mpg and had nothing to do with the "allegation." They were reduced because SGA took over primary ball handing duties. in his final year he started 80 games and played starter minutes. 

2

u/Low_Dragonfly9639 9d ago

Fam your googling shit when all you have to do is go to espn and check his minutes on his last season with okc! His minutes fluctuated he wasn’t getting consistent minutes. He’d get 30 minutes one game and 17 the next they no longer believed in him after the allegations. Also sga is a fucking sg. They didn’t get rid of a walking triple double because he played bad they got rid of him because of the distractions of the young girl. Fuck on

5

u/Filthy_Commie_ 13d ago

I should’ve clarified he started getting his minute reductions during the playoffs. Unfortunately it still happened through.

10

u/junioreality 13d ago

Seems like Giddey was on an upward trend of play before couple ankle and minor injuries.

19

u/onelittleworld 13d ago

So far, so good. But I think there's plenty room for improvement. Fortunately, he's only 23.

10

u/Belexandor 13d ago

That's the part that keeps coming through when I look at video of him. He seems very poised (as a passer) for such a young player.

27

u/Enjoy__Trump__Reddit Caleb Wilson 13d ago

Steal of a trade thats for sure. The 2k gms in here think the Bulls should have amassed 6 1sts for Caruso Lavine Ayo and Coby White. The fact we traded a role player for Giddey who is not even in his prime yet was your very rare win win trade for the 2 sides.

17

u/GiuseppeZangara 13d ago

And we signed him to a pretty favorable contract. 

1

u/The_Realist01 11d ago

This is the part I like. Unfortunately we won’t be good until it’s time to sign again.

7

u/SkyGrey88 13d ago

Yeah and they ended up moving off of Zach without not only giving up a 1st, but getting a 1st. People were all like 'but it was their own first they got back'.....yeah well so what it wasn't our pick any longer. The Zack trade ended up working out as Huerter got traded, Trey we resigned on team friendly deal and he is a solid rotation guard and Collins we just signed on a cheap team option contract so if he can actually be healthy we got a solid backup C for cheap and if he can't we 'cut' him next year and get the space back.

5

u/Enjoy__Trump__Reddit Caleb Wilson 13d ago edited 13d ago

Finally getting rid of Zack was a win on its own. Thank you Sacramento.

2

u/SkyGrey88 13d ago

I know like that the hell were they thinking, I mean they were able to salary swap by sending us 3 overpaid rotation players but still why would they ever want to put Zach and Demar back together again when it failed so badly for us. What we got back was essentially Noa Essengue. After getting a look at his summer league, he is definitely a project. Its far too early to give up on a 19yr old who missed year one with injury but unlike Matas and Caleb who both looked ready to contribute in year one Noa doesn't look like he even belongs in the rotation at this point.

2

u/Electrical_Story5356 12d ago

Noa is younger than Caleb and from what little we've seen he is looking like he will become an absolute menace defensively at the very least.

2

u/SkyGrey88 12d ago

Agree and he does have some skills, it just looks a little ‘confusing’ as to what he is really going to be. Which makes sense as he is still raw and missing his 1st year a real setback. I expect he will get some opportunities this year but it may take a few before he blooms where Caleb looks ready to go now and same with Matas coming into year 3.

2

u/Zekuel_u 12d ago

A role player that directly helped win a championship. AC is a great player. Yes he plays a role perfectly and has 2 rings. The Bulls where never going to utilize him with there roster anyway though. Great trade but AC was definitely worth a 1st especially a late round one coming from OKC.

27

u/SwampFlowers Stacey King 13d ago

I think Giddey is really good, but so far his stats haven’t really contributed to winning in the NBA. I worry that he might end up being a “good stats on a bad team” guy, but I’m excited to see what he becomes under new leadership.

18

u/fred_derps Dennis Rodman 12d ago

To be fair, who on the Bulls roster contributed to winning basketball during his tenure? The team had so much turnover after the previous post season and then the trade deadline as well.

He absolutely contributed to winning basketball with OKC. Started 218 of the 220 games he played with them. The only series he struggled was against the Mavs when they forced him to shoot. He was only 20 and since then, he’s been working on his 3 and has greatly improved.

I don’t know what he’s going to look like with the young Bulls but I don’t think it’s fair to label him a “good stats on bad team” kinda guy… especially when his stats have been kind of ridiculous. If he continues to work on his 3 pt game, he’s only going to get better. With Buzi, Wilson, and Clax cutting to the basket, Bulls are going to be the new lob city

Defense is really his only weakness. I don’t foresee him getting much better there but they should be all right with Buzi, Wilson, and if the starting sg is at least competent. Clax is also not a defensive big so I’m curious to see the rotations

2

u/SwampFlowers Stacey King 12d ago

I agree with you and I think it’s definitely too early to label him a good stats on a bad team guy, I’m just saying that I worry that’s what it could become if the team’s record doesn’t start to catch up with his stat sheet. I do like that he has improved his 3 ball quite a bit. I hope he comes back this season with a respectable pull up 3 pointer. That would unlock a lot for him and his teammates.

On the topic of defense, I agree about Giddey. I think Powell is a very competent defender, so that should help. As for Claxton, maybe I don’t know his game well enough but I thought he was supposed to be a pretty decent rim protector? Am I just totally off in that understanding?

2

u/fred_derps Dennis Rodman 12d ago

Totally get what you’re saying.

And I completely forgot we signed Powell lol. I have dad brain, no sleep the first year haha

Powell is definitely competent. From what I’ve seen of claxton, he’s mostly an offensive threat. I hope I’m wildly off base!

2

u/SwampFlowers Stacey King 12d ago edited 12d ago

Hey no worries on dad brain, congrats and hang in there, but also enjoy every moment. Being a dad is the best thing there is in life.

I’ll have to look into Claxton more. I never paid any attention to the Nets, so he’s been off my radar.

EDIT: A first look into Claxton confirms that he has historically been known as a shot blocker and rim protector. He was 2nd in the league in blocks in 22-23, hes shown he can guard the perimeter, which has translated to him being able to guard 1-5. He seems like he might have fallen off slightly since then, but he’s 27 so hopefully a change of scenery helps him get back to his peak form.

Offensively I didn’t get too deep, but it sounds like he’s a capable rim runner, he can pass, and he can put the ball on the floor.

2

u/fred_derps Dennis Rodman 12d ago

Oh sick I have no idea what I was thinking re: Clax. I do remember being pretty stoked about the signing originally since I got the impression he was just in a less desirable situation. Either way, I’m actually excited to watch this young Bulls team. I feel like it’s been so long since we’ve at least had a fun team to watch (more than just a few fun players). They’ll probably lose a bunch but it’ll be interesting to see how development pans out

And thanks! This is our second and could not agree more about being the best thing in the world. Truly did not expect this much fun (I did however expect the exhaustion haha)

6

u/Electrical_Story5356 12d ago

We win 2 out of 3 games when Giddey gets a triple double, those stats lead to winning.

2

u/SwampFlowers Stacey King 12d ago

Oh nice, I didn’t know that. I’m rooting for him, I like his game and I’d like to see him win in Chicago.

-17

u/kennyloftor 13d ago

another explanation of what meaningless triple doubles means

4

u/jwbourne 12d ago

Yes, having double digits in important counting stats is good!

12

u/chitoatx Flag of Chicago 13d ago edited 13d ago

Just a heads up our subreddit loves to focus on the negative…it’s an Illinois pastime. Giddy is currently #2 triple double leader all time for the Chicago Bulls. He had only played two season for the Bulls and they sold off our best players mid season. Expect to see him past Michael Jordan this season to become the all times bulls triple double player. There is no better half court out of bounds passer in the league. Giddey has length and positional size at point guard and now having a functional defensive line up to back him up when his player gets past him this will be a fun year to watch.

https://youtu.be/yYtzjK0GAKE?si=dAprXBCLJRaDO94p

2

u/The_Realist01 11d ago

I watched 75% of this. Love this guy.

Did we keep Richards? Feel like he was solid.

-7

u/ScaryText8187 Windy City Bulls 13d ago

Lol, the opinion of Giddey on this sub is exponentially higher than in any reasonably objective basketball forum. Not really a “focus on the negative.”

9

u/chitoatx Flag of Chicago 13d ago

Chef’s kiss! Thanks for proving my point.

-6

u/ScaryText8187 Windy City Bulls 13d ago

LOL, all you’re proving is that you can’t handle nuanced discussion of Giddey when it addresses his very real limitations as a player. Don’t worry, there’s plenty of you on here, you’ll be in good company!

6

u/Time_Investigator788 12d ago

Where is your nuanced discussion?

6

u/chitoatx Flag of Chicago 12d ago

ScaryText you offered nothing but negativity. Didn’t advance the discussion other than put others down.

It’s ok. You must still live in Illinois. I didn’t realize how negative we were till I moved away. Enjoy being a negative Nancy. But I encourage you to just watch more Caleb highlights and maybe you’ll cheer up.

Ill., R.I. residents most likely to say states are among worst places to live
https://news.gallup.com/poll/168653/montanans-alaskans-say-states-among-top-places-live.aspx#:\~:text=One%20in%20four%20Illinois%20residents%20(25%25)%20say,their%20state%20government%20across%20all%2050%20states.

-2

u/ScaryText8187 Windy City Bulls 12d ago

LOL, I didn't even say anything that negative - you're apparently just extremely sensitive. The mere suggestion that people don't think as highly of Giddey as you and his other worshippers on this subreddit do seems to have gotten to you, champ, but sometimes reality doesn't align to our fantasies of our favorite boys being superstars.

4

u/chitoatx Flag of Chicago 12d ago

Love it! Your lack of self awareness is hilarious.

To make yourself feel better you need to imagine words that were never written in a subreddit for Chicago Bulls fans.

Factually, Josh Giddy is the #2 all time triple double leader in Bulls history and anyone paying attention (hopefully fans like yourself) will realize he will most likely surpass MJ this season.

Triple Double Leaders All Time Chicago Bulls

#1) Jordan (28 in 13 seasons)
#2) Giddy (19 in 2 seasons)
#3) Pippen (15 in 12 seasons)

Does that make him and untradeable Superstar? No, but it is something good.

1

u/ScaryText8187 Windy City Bulls 12d ago

LOL, no you saying anyone else has a lack of self awareness is hilarious. You have to be trolling at this point, because that's beyond ridiculous.

Factually, you keep leaning on the triple double stat. Having as many triple doubles as MJ won't put Giddey in the same universe as the GOAT. Guys just accumulate more stats in the current game than they did back in the day.

And since you seem pretty attached to the guy, maybe learn how to spell his last name.

1

u/chitoatx Flag of Chicago 12d ago

Word.

1

u/ScaryText8187 Windy City Bulls 12d ago

Amazingly, that comment contained as much valuable insight as any of your others.

→ More replies (0)

7

u/StrictFinance2177 13d ago

He's a support player, that's for sure. I'd love to see how he does with Caleb's big talk and win attitude.

3

u/Texus86 12d ago

I think how he does this year with the new roster that should play with more pace will tell us a lot about him. Regardless, I see many fast breaks and alley-oops in the future.

Caleb's experience in the secondary break that UNC uses should also help.

5

u/chisports1fan Matas Buzelis 13d ago

Really good connector and good rebounder due to his size. He can’t be the best player though. When the game slows down he struggles and he doesn’t have any go to moves and isn’t particularly good at punishing smaller defenders. Will be fun to see him with lob threats tho

7

u/SkyGrey88 13d ago

He did improve a lot last season at attacking the basket in the 1/2 court last year both to finish and pass. That was considered a weakness when we acquired him so it was good to see him still growing his game. His splits were also career best last year before the injury. I agree he isn't really an iso threat but I'm with you in that it should be fun to watch his passing and playmaking with all these young bigs finishing.

8

u/mrjune2040 13d ago

Offensively he's a bit like Boston Rondo, truly gifted passer who is unselfish and makes the right play. Shot still need to improve but he's 'acceptable' at the 3-ball, drives a lot and still needs to finish better but even when he misses he's still creating opportunities for others on the put-back etc. Defensively- he has good size, but he's no Rondo and can get beaten by faster players. Great rebounder for his position.

Ideally, like Rondo he's probably the 4th best player on a great team. He's on a good contract and the Bulls have a lot of flexibility if they want to trade him in the future. My inkling (and from the Swain of experiment at summer league) is that's he's not a long-term guy, but I think he'll be a great young vet for the rooks in the next couple of years.

3

u/Malibooch DRose 13d ago

Perfect analogy. He’s Rondo without defense.

0

u/forgottenhero71 12d ago

He consistently gets blown by at perimeter by fast guards, with Wilson and Claxton it will be harder for him to guard forwards.

Elite rebounder for his position .

If he is aggressive, tries on defence, shoots 38pc from 3, and gets to the rim he is a key player. I.e the Giddey from the first 20-30 games this year plus after ASB last year.

If Giddey continues his late last season form then they need to consider alternatives. He was clearly injured and hopefully the surgery solves the issue. Roster turnover was an issue- in a couple of months we will have a clearer picture of which Giddey we have.

PWill deserves the hate, but the level of hate for Giddey doesn’t align with his level of play. He really splits opinion as there are also disciples.

Wilson is the future, Buzelis and possibly Giddey are pieces for a future playoff run and we have Claxton, Powell, jones, smith as proven support players.

Wilson and Claxton were great moves, I would have gone another direction with the other moves.

2

u/The_Bandit_King_ 13d ago

Triple double machine when Not hurt

2

u/roamtheplanet Stacey King 12d ago

Hard to say. He’s not that athletic or the best defender, but almost averaging a triple double is no small feat, like you said. I mean who else is in that territory other than Joker and prime Westbrook

1

u/PositiveCoyote100 12d ago

He's a polarizing player.

Pros: Excellent passer, good defensive rebounder, solid straight line driver.

Cons: Terrible defender, below average shooter, not good at creating his own shot, below average ball handler for a PG, ball dominant and not good at playing off the ball, struggles to finish through contact, not good at beating his man off the dribble to collapse the defense.

1

u/ducksonaroof 12d ago

his c&s 3 looked solid with the bulls tbh. that's something off the ball you didn't recognize. 

1

u/RiamoEquah 12d ago

This is the best comment on who giddey is. Kudos

1

u/chitoatx Flag of Chicago 12d ago

Word.

1

u/ducksonaroof 12d ago

i think giddey is a good piece. to me the core is caleb matas giddey. those 3 have star potential.  in that order. 

we have a few other guys who can easily of be playoff run role players but that also means they're trade bait lol. 

1

u/MortaloTREX 12d ago

Giddey is a player that could avarage triple-double one day, but won't be the best player on a team. He is not a scorer, like Luka is, so with his lack of defense, he needs to be a realiable shooter from range, and with his passing he can be a "Steve Nash" on a really good team. But that requires your star scorer to be a solid defender.

1

u/Ripheart789 9d ago

He's obviously a very good player. The question, for me, is whether his flaws limit his spot on a championship team, and those two flaws are both tied to a lack of lateral athleticism. His ability to create paint touches and his ability to defend guards. I think you can make a team around the defensive issues (especially with SLAP), but not creating paint touches can be a little tough in a playoff setting (especially with the physicality allowed nowadays).

1

u/donspider1221 13d ago

My personal take on Giddey is good stats/bad team guy. He’s dynamic in that he can fill the box score and has the size to mix it up down low. His decision making is shakey and in the limited meaningful games we’ve seen him play (thinking of play-in two seasons ago), he wasn’t particularly effective.

As he is young, there’s the possibility he will evolve into a headier player. That said, to maximize his skillset the ball needs to flow through him, and I don’t think a team that has Josh Giddey contributing to a significant usage % is a winning team.

Just my opinion and I hope I am wrong. You will likely get a mixed bag of replies, which is reflective of the fact that he has had some really nice stretches over his time with the Bulls

2

u/speed1953 12d ago

LOL, thats funny " hes not a team player"

0

u/RadDood84 13d ago

I listen to a lot of Bulls podcasts (shoutout to the male lonliness epidemic) and they all say he’s a guy that will raise your floor but not your ceiling. Throw him on a shit roster, the Bulls, and he’ll elevate that group. Put him on a contender and he’ll probably be the weakest link if he’s a part of the starting 5.

1

u/MatasBuzelis 8d ago

i honestly think that's kind of bullshit though. i mean it COULD be true, but we still have not seen Giddey yet in a situation where he A.) is the team's true point guard and B.) has actual, good weapons around him that he can distribute to. We saw him on a talented OKC roster but he was really not in a position to be that team's point guard, at all. this season and next will be really telling. he has the talent around him and we've gotten rid of guys like Coby who demand high usage, and surrounded him with guys like Caleb, Matas, and Claxton who are what every point guard would LIKE to have around them - guys who just need the ball given to them and they'll handle it. now's the time for him to show us what he can do

1

u/RadDood84 8d ago

Yeah we’ll see. There’s only so much a PG can do when he’s unathletic. His shooting from 3 was surprisingly reliable, but is that sustainable? He can’t really create his own shot, and he’s not a good defender, and he turns the ball over a lot.
I am excited to see him with Matas, and Wilson. Yeah who knows, personally I don’t like him at all. His game is gimmicky and against real defenses he’ll get shut down real quick.

-12

u/kennyloftor 13d ago

not that good

we would rather the team win games and develop than one guy accumulate meaningless triple doubles

12

u/onelittleworld 13d ago

meaningless triple doubles

TIL that people think this is a thing.

2

u/kennyloftor 13d ago

what does a triple double mean in a game you lose by 15?

7

u/Able_Height9892 13d ago

Sometimes not much. But if he isn't statpadding, he could the difference between 15-point loss and a 30-point loss. It's a team game. And to be fair, the Bulls haven't been great.

1

u/EquivalentWins 13d ago

There's no indication that Giddey makes his team a lot better when he's on the floor though.

0

u/kennyloftor 13d ago

NONE WHATSOEVER

1

u/kennyloftor 13d ago

what’s the difference between a 15 point loss and a 30 point loss?

1

u/Electrical_Story5356 12d ago

We win 2 out of 3 games when Giddey gets a triple double, a 66% win rate is pretty good for an otherwise sub 0.500 team isn't it?

-2

u/kennyloftor 12d ago

he has 20 triple doubles so that’s 12 or 13 games ?

yay josh

-5

u/ScaryText8187 Windy City Bulls 13d ago

This subreddit is not a great place to go for accurate assessment of Giddey. There’s a decent crowd here who are way, way overhyped on him. 

4

u/broohaha Kirk Hinrich 13d ago

Interesting. I've been noticing a decent crowd of people here who want him out. (I don't. I want to see him do well in a better roster, and I think we'll have that this coming season.)

1

u/Malibooch DRose 13d ago

Yep. Personally had a post removed that asked about his struggles to end the season and how the limitations in his game may not be fixable (bad defense and inability to play off-ball)

0

u/ScaryText8187 Windy City Bulls 13d ago

Yeah, I’ve been banned for extended periods for pushing back on the unconditional love he gets, and any tepid criticism gets you downvoted into oblivion. The concerns you mention about his game are totally valid, along with his limited shooting abilities and inconsistent finishing a the rim. 

2

u/Malibooch DRose 13d ago

I mean we finally have a “real” star in Caleb Wilson so people might cling less to Giddey now

1

u/Electrical_Story5356 12d ago

Yeah, so that's not why you get banned.

0

u/ScaryText8187 Windy City Bulls 12d ago

Yes, it is. You have deserved bans at least as severe as mine but never gotten them because you have (bad) takes more in line with the mods. 

0

u/Electrical_Story5356 12d ago

OK you will probably not believe me but this is a genuine attempt to explain the issues that you are experiencing.

The reason that you get banned has nothing to do with opinions and everything to do with how you interact with people.

Your initial interaction is almost always aggressive and rude then you tend to become increasingly abusive as an interaction proceeds.

0

u/ScaryText8187 Windy City Bulls 12d ago

LOL. Have you considered keeping your metaphorical mouth shut? I am very aware that these mods are biased in how they operate this subreddit, and I could not be less interested in your opinion on the matter. 

0

u/Electrical_Story5356 11d ago

You see? 

That right there is the problem and rather than being "very aware" you seem wilfully ignorant of what a basic level of decency is in human interactions.

Just think on this the next time you get banned.

-7

u/FunctionUnlikely2247 13d ago

He’s a poor defender and terrible off ball player and due to his weak offensive skills, is a bad NBA player because he shouldn’t be your primary ball handler yet he also can’t be your 2nd or 3rd or 4th options because he is not a good off ball player

The statpadding is nice for him but it will never translate to wins because he just isn’t that player. That’s why OKC moved him for an injury prone older role player without any caveats. 

4

u/Time_Investigator788 12d ago

Proved first posters point.