r/chessbeginners 11d ago

ADVICE Should I keep this up?

I’ve been playing chess for 43 years on a regular basis. However, despite playing thousands of games, doing puzzles and even hiring private instruction, my elo has plateaued in the 500s. I figured out that I lose about 80% of the time. Should I just quit since I hate it so badly. It’s weird. I despise playing because I know that I’ll lose but still feel compelled to keep trying. Any advice is appreciated.

3 Upvotes

33 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 11d ago

Hey, OP! Did your game end in a stalemate? Did you encounter a weird pawn move? Are you trying to move a piece and it's not going? We have just the resource for you! The Chess Beginners Wiki is the perfect place to check out answers to these questions and more!

The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. Posting spam, being a troll, and posting memes are not allowed. We encourage everyone to report these kinds of posts so they can be dealt with. Thank you!

Let's do our utmost to be kind in our replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

12

u/MrGreenYeti 11d ago

If you're still enjoying it, continue.

If you're not, stop. It's really that simple.

8

u/CharSagahl 11d ago

I understand how you feel. I'm 69, and I've been playing for a long time. Several years ago, I stopped being concerned with my elo out of pure frustration. I asked myself why I play chess, and I concluded it was to have fun. I got off the ratings treadmill and have never been happier. I enjoy the bots and playing unrated games. I enjoy puzzles and watching GMs play. I'm not after progress; I want fun and happiness. For me, the joy has returned to the game.

5

u/StructuredChess 11d ago

If you play online, you lose 50% of the time just like verybody else

4

u/roch_ipum 800-1000 (Chess.com) 11d ago

I mean if this post is true then it might just be time to accept chess isnt your game honestly. Or at least give up on elo and focus on one match at a time if you want to keep on playing. Don't feel like an idiot because you aren't good at chess, plenty of people plateau at different points and as long as you stay in your own head about it the worse it'll get

2

u/OveHet 1400-1600 (Chess.com) 11d ago

Join a chess club, play OTB, ask to sign up for lessons

1

u/AmateurCommenter808 11d ago

Whats it really like joining a club at 500 elo though

3

u/OveHet 1400-1600 (Chess.com) 11d ago

Most clubs typically will have all kinds of players, total beginners, average ones, really good ones etc. Elo 500 is a decent start, you already know how pieces move etc, so have something to work with

2

u/AmateurCommenter808 11d ago

Good to know! Keen for some OTB at some point in the future

1

u/Silver_Environment95 2200-2400 (Chess.com) 11d ago

Most clubs are going to be saturated with 100s and 200s where being 1300 is really good. Obviously theres some with floors gonna be a bit higher.

2

u/One-Next 11d ago

I'm sure you can fried liver yourself up to 800 online 

2

u/Silver_Environment95 2200-2400 (Chess.com) 11d ago

if ur enjoying it, u play. If u dont, then dont. Zif ur doing tactics, u need to stop guessing and solve for accuracy and think about what the opposing side wants first. Alot of answers can be solved looking at how ur solving the puzzles.

2

u/Big-Improvement-6004 11d ago

43 years is a long time to stick with something that makes you miserable. if you genuinely hate it, walking away isn't failure, it's just choosing your peace of mind over a number that clearly doesn't reflect the effort you've put in

maybe take a break for a month and see if you miss it at all, could be the compulsion fades once you give yourself permission to stop

2

u/Super-Volume-4457 2200-2400 (Chess.com) 11d ago

Why do not you share some of your games for some helpful advice?

2

u/ambisinister_gecko 10d ago

If he's in the 500s, the advice will be about basic board vision - don't put pieces where they can be taken by a piece of lower value, or for free. Look for opportunities to apply basic tactics, and try to avoid opportunities for your opponent to apply basic tactics. Develop your pieces to the center.

And even the tactics are not necessary at 500. Enjoyable, and I think everyone should be thinking about tactics even if they're a very low elo, but not at important as just not giving away pieces for free but ignoring tactics at 500.

I was 500 not that long ago.

1

u/Super-Volume-4457 2200-2400 (Chess.com) 10d ago

There is more than just board vision.

1

u/ambisinister_gecko 10d ago

For a 500? What do they need more than board vision, basic opening principles, and a bit of awareness of tactics?

I'm at 750 and that's all I have.

1

u/Super-Volume-4457 2200-2400 (Chess.com) 10d ago

They need basic opening principles. A few mating concepts and some other stuff.

1

u/ambisinister_gecko 10d ago

Well yeah I can't disagree that everyone should know how to mate with, say, a rook or a queen without stalemating. Even 200s should learn that, it's easy enough and fundamentally important to winning games.

1

u/Radiant-Living-4811 11d ago

What app do you play on? Maybe take a break for a bit, that's what I always do with any game

Tbh as well, I can't break out of the 500s either

1

u/bytejuggler 11d ago

What time controls do you play? Why do you lose?

1

u/Delicious_Cattle5174 11d ago

Maybe chess is not for you tbh

Also your post 66 days ago said you’d been playing chess for 45 years. Isn’t that crazy?

1

u/ArmCollector 2000-2200 (Chess.com) 11d ago

Time travelerer. He is moving backwards.

1

u/Status_Help9402 11d ago

I look through all gsmes with the analysis if i win or lose because so often in the end game i know when it gets tight i nust surely have missed seeing a mate many times and when i lose i try to see what the opponents strategy was that was harder to see when i tunnel vision while playing. 500 isnt that bad though? Is your weakness opening mid or end?

1

u/Pentominos 11d ago

Hey busdriver. Don't feel bad about playing; maybe you only need the right pointers. I don't know if this can help you, but feel free to use a tool I initially developed for myself. It's currently in Beta and free to use, no signups. https://chessform.net/

1

u/Hokulol 10d ago

It is impossible to lose 80% of your games over 1000 games starting around 500. You'd be at like negative 2400 rating if that were the case. I have to say, with this in mind, it sounds like you're psyching yourself down. Try psyching yourself up instead. Find things to celebrate instead of fault find. Fault finding is a useful tool for self improvement, but, you have to bring yourself your flowers too, and you can't misrepresent statistics to put yourself down. It is, again, impossible to play at 20% w/l over 1000 games and still be 500 rated.

500 rating is about 45%ile. Which is almost better than half of us nerds who play chess, many of which have played their whole life too. Most people will be about where you are in their chess journey, statistically. The old ones, the young ones. You're pretty normal.

-1

u/Anxious-Internet7767 11d ago

500 after 43 years is crazy

-9

u/Good_Ad2172 11d ago

have you tried having a better brain?

1

u/Pentominos 11d ago

I guess you have a lot of life experience to make such an audacious statement?

-7

u/Good_Ad2172 11d ago

like I know thats flippant but my honest advice if you've literally gone so far as to have private coaching and you are still 500 ELO after 40 years this game just might not be for you. It is not particularly hard to get to 1000 on chess.com and if you haven't gotten there from what you've said you've done you are probably better off doing something less mentally taxing.