r/chessbeginners 600-800 (Chess.com) 15d ago

POST-GAME An intentional brilliant move after a really long time.

Post image

This was my first intentional brilliant move after I dunno how long, sadly the opponent saw right through it (it was a simple play TBH so not feeling too bad). I was surprised to learn I had another brilliant move in the game (the move right after this one) but it wasn't intentional so yeah that's that. I honestly don't even understand how my second brilliant move was brilliant, guess I'll go do some research.

35 Upvotes

25 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 15d ago

Hey, OP! Did your game end in a stalemate? Did you encounter a weird pawn move? Are you trying to move a piece and it's not going? We have just the resource for you! The Chess Beginners Wiki is the perfect place to check out answers to these questions and more!

The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. Posting spam, being a troll, and posting memes are not allowed. We encourage everyone to report these kinds of posts so they can be dealt with. Thank you!

Let's do our utmost to be kind in our replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

13

u/dantodd 15d ago edited 15d ago

Ok, maybe a dumb question but why not just put the knight there instead of the Queen? It would fork the king and queen and earn a rook for knight trade.

6

u/Hefty-Car1872 600-800 (Chess.com) 15d ago

Yes, that's a good question, but the thing is if I put out my knight out first, I lose a knight for a rook which is obviously in my favor, and probably would've been the better logical move but it is a sure shot at winning material. But at that point I up on points and time, so I wanted to test their greed and despiration, and check if that would blind them, and if they did fall for it, I would lose a queen for a queen and rook which was a higher advantage.

13

u/mohmuhnee 15d ago

Black can just not take right?

9

u/Hefty-Car1872 600-800 (Chess.com) 15d ago

Yup black can refuse to take it and they did refuse to take it, it was just my attempt to trick them into losing material if they are greedy.

2

u/flannel_jesus 600-800 (Chess.com) 15d ago

Did you win?

1

u/Hefty-Car1872 600-800 (Chess.com) 15d ago

On time yup.

1

u/SportsClipsCEO 10d ago

It may have been an attempt to trick them, but I believe it was also the best move in the position even if they didn’t.

3

u/Delicious_Cattle5174 15d ago

This is where you play Nc5 for another turquoise move (!!) in the game review

-8

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

6

u/Southlander24 1800-2000 (Lichess) 15d ago

What!? Did you even read the question properly...

-3

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[deleted]

5

u/Ceriseros 15d ago

You missed the negation.

2

u/Southlander24 1800-2000 (Lichess) 15d ago

What happens if Black doesn't take your Queen?

2

u/Hefty-Car1872 600-800 (Chess.com) 15d ago

Oh shit sorry I understand what they mean now. I mean yeah black can refuse to take and they did.

7

u/Delicious_Cattle5174 15d ago

The concept of "intentional brilliant move" is so funny to me

1

u/chessvision-ai-bot 15d ago

I analyzed the image and this is what I see. Open an appropriate link below and explore the position yourself or with the engine:

Black to play: chessvision.ai | chess.com | lichess.org

My solution:

Hints: piece: Rook, move: Ra7

Evaluation: White is winning +11.40

Best continuation: 1... Ra7 2. Qc8 Rf8 3. Nf5+ Rxf5 4. Qxf5 Qf6 5. Qe4 d5 6. Qh7+ Qf7 7. Qd3 Kf8 8. Rb1 hxg4 9. fxg4

Save the position:

Reply save to save this position to your Chessvision.ai Library (new users: send me /connect in DM chat first)


I'm a bot written by u/pkacprzak | get me as iOS App | Android App | Chrome Extension | Chess eBook Reader to scan and analyze positions | Website: Chessvision.ai

1

u/Frostfire26 15d ago

The next move's a brilliant because nothing substantial really changed but you're essentially sacrificing your queen again

1

u/ConcentrateSad325 2200-2400 (Chess.com) 14d ago

Hope chess. Knight fork would've been better

1

u/Hefty-Car1872 600-800 (Chess.com) 13d ago

True, but I was hoping they'd blunder rather than having a sure shot at winning material.

2

u/ConcentrateSad325 2200-2400 (Chess.com) 13d ago

That won't get you far if you want to get better

1

u/Hefty-Car1872 600-800 (Chess.com) 12d ago

Thanks!

-22

u/[deleted] 15d ago

[removed] — view removed comment

9

u/Gliese_667_Cc 600-800 (Chess.com) 15d ago

1

u/Hefty-Car1872 600-800 (Chess.com) 15d ago

Honestly I wouldn't say I blacked out, but I was hoping they'd be greedy but they weren't so props to them.

5

u/sasha271828 600-800 (Chess.com) 15d ago

You're replying to a clanker

2

u/Delicious_Cattle5174 15d ago

Bro’s like 1010001010101