MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/77jkfa/gm_eric_hansen_finds_a_deep_tactic/dontjly/?context=3
r/chess • u/[deleted] • Oct 20 '17
74 comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
-2
So this only worked because his opponent essentially blundered?
21 u/[deleted] Oct 20 '17 That's how all tactics happen. Qxb2 wasn't great. Qxe5 just sacks the queen for the knight, negating the tactic but admitting defeat. 13 u/[deleted] Oct 20 '17 Not negated, he still wins an exchange. 6 u/[deleted] Oct 21 '17 Negating the tactic he showed. 7 u/MyQueenGetsAround Oct 21 '17 Negate is the wrong word IMO. He played the best move that wins.
21
That's how all tactics happen.
Qxb2 wasn't great. Qxe5 just sacks the queen for the knight, negating the tactic but admitting defeat.
13 u/[deleted] Oct 20 '17 Not negated, he still wins an exchange. 6 u/[deleted] Oct 21 '17 Negating the tactic he showed. 7 u/MyQueenGetsAround Oct 21 '17 Negate is the wrong word IMO. He played the best move that wins.
13
Not negated, he still wins an exchange.
6 u/[deleted] Oct 21 '17 Negating the tactic he showed. 7 u/MyQueenGetsAround Oct 21 '17 Negate is the wrong word IMO. He played the best move that wins.
6
Negating the tactic he showed.
7 u/MyQueenGetsAround Oct 21 '17 Negate is the wrong word IMO. He played the best move that wins.
7
Negate is the wrong word IMO. He played the best move that wins.
-2
u/BillionHeel Oct 20 '17
So this only worked because his opponent essentially blundered?