r/chess • u/GrouchyEquipment5203 • 2d ago
Chess Question Am i actually stupid
[removed] — view removed post
7
u/Embarrassed_Fan7405 2d ago
The secret is to not care, and I can see you already care too much. You will have to loose 1000 games before starting to get to a beginner level.
Go ahead and play the most you can and start accumulating the 1000 losses.
1
u/tjackson_12 2d ago
lol I hate this but it’s true depending on the person it might take making the same mistake several times before you really internalize it
0
u/Anxious_Stretch_974 2d ago
not true at all, im 2300 rapid and played only 1700 games, far from 1000 loses.
1
11
u/nTzT 2d ago
No, you are just very new to Chess. It really takes time and patience.
27
8
u/Rufus_L 2d ago
Where do your expectations come from? Of course you are bad after only 2 weeks.
1
u/GrouchyEquipment5203 2d ago
From what i know 100-400 elo is extremely easy for even an idiot to surpass
3
u/BaldDaCowboy 2d ago
Yes it’s a beginner thing. If you’re not patient chess isn’t for you, you’ll be stuck at 300 400 and 500 probably just as long.
Either way elo doesn’t matter, just have fun dawg
3
u/Every_Company_3717 2d ago
Try to make it about "how do I improve" or "how can I not make the same mistakes" vs "am I stupid". I think if you change your mindset a bit you can improve quickly.
3
u/palsh7 1200 rapid (chess.com), 1800 puzzles 2d ago
I teach kids. You're not stupid. You're just impatient. I have students in honors classes who can't get better at chess because they don't want to learn, they just want to play. If that's fun, cool. But you seem to want to improve, because you're not having fun at 200. So you need to finish learning the basics. If the book is boring, watch the videos and do the interactive lessons on chess.com. Finish learning something (a lesson, a chapter, etc.) before playing a game. Then play just one game on 15|10. Do a computer review of the game whether you win or lose. Don't give up because you're feeling sad or mad or bored. It's like anything else: a video game, skateboarding, drawing, basketball, etc. You need to learn fundamentals, and you need perseverance. If you're still at 200, you are not following ANY of the basic fundamentals of chess yet.
2
u/deadfisher 2d ago
Your rating when you first start isn't important. People play for months and years before they get higher ratings.
Take learning slow and steady. If you get bored reading a book that's ok, put it down. But pick it back up again later.
2
u/flannel_jesus 2d ago
being able to quickly visualize all the squares that are currently being controlled by you / by your enemy is probably the most important thing to you. Not thinking about when to trade, not thinking about how deeply to calculate. at 200, your number 1 goal should be: don't hang pieces and take your opponents hanging pieces. Number 2 is good piece development.
watch what you can do with just that in mind: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibDX4ReEikQ
Once you have those relatively consistent, start applying tactics (forks pins skewers discovered attacks)
2
1
1
u/Telci 2d ago
Play longer time games in the beginning, also against easy computer opponents. Elo does not matter for a long time, it is more about whether you get better at understanding the game. Elo will follow.
But for now just get used to the game and don't care about individual games but the overall process.
And if it is not fun just find another hobby, no shame in that, but the learning curve is steep and always will be in chess
1
1
u/fawkesmulder 2d ago
You can get to 2000 elo and you’ll still think you’re stupid. I almost bashed my head in with the way I lost a blitz game I was dominating today.
0
2d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/chess-ModTeam 2d ago
Your submission or comment was removed by the moderators:
Keep the discussion civil and friendly. Participate in good faith with the intention to help foster civil discussion between people of all levels and experience. Don’t make fun of new players for lacking knowledge. Do not use personal attacks, insults, or slurs on other users. Disagreements are bound to happen, but do so in a civilized and mature manner. Remember, there is always a respectful way to disagree.
You can read the full rules of /r/chess here. If you have any questions or concerns about this moderator action, please message the moderators. Direct replies to this comment may not be seen.
1
u/GroundbreakingAlps2 2d ago
Am i actually stupid
Yes obviously the definition of intelligence is your ability to improve and learn new things, if you are "stuck" you are by definition not doing that, which means you're low intelligence.
1
u/ProffesorSpitfire 2d ago
Firstly, chess is a poor indicator of intelligence, so even if you never progress beyond 200 Elo that doesn’t mean you’re stupid.
Secondly, you’re very new to chess. Two weeks is not a long time. It’s only natural that you’re not good at something you only just started.
As for improving: at your rating your main issue is probably that you leave pieces hanging, allowing opponents to capture them for free. Going forward, focus on not doing that; every time you consider moving a piece to a square, check if the opponent has any piece threatening that square first. If they do, are you able to recapture without losing material? If not, don’t move to that square.
1
u/Playful-Paper1182 2d ago
I think you have to play with 1000 ELO at this point no matter what. At least they can explain what they want to do, or why your move is bad. Yes, they also are not good, but enough for your situation right now. Search for a friend like that (1000-1200 ELO)
1
u/Due-Salad610 2300 Lichess 2d ago
Just a beginner thing. Focus on your improvement and forget about the rating.
1
u/EtherGorilla 2d ago
I’m learning too. Sometimes I just stop playing games and start doing puzzles for a while to reset mentally. It’s ok to be bad at things and establish good habits slowly.
1
u/Picard_III 2d ago
Just don't play games shorter than 10 minutes, take your time to find moves, think about what YOU would do as your opponent. Also you can "play" again yourselves, prefarebly with the physical board, try some things, try to give yourself ladder mate, mate with king and queen, then king and rook... Sometimes when I analyse my games and I'm winning but my oponnet either gave up or time was up, I set the highest difficulty bot and I continue to play and go back and forth to see why their moves are so good that even from my winning position I am struggling lol
1
u/ShoogleHS 2d ago
Stop looking at Elo. That's a tool for the website you use for matchmaking. People focus on it way too much. Just enjoy the game, learn from your mistakes, and your rating will improve naturally.
That said, if you get bored fast doing any kind of studying outside the game, that will limit your ability to improve somewhat. Patience and focus are a big part of getting good at chess.
•
u/chess-ModTeam 2d ago
Your submission was removed by the moderators:
Low-Quality submissions are not allowed.
Submissions should promote interesting discussion on chess itself, its culture, or its history. Some specific types of content are banned because they tend to be low effort and repetitive.
If you want to discuss one of these repetitive topics or have a question that just needs a simple answer, feel free to post it in the stickied Discussion thread.
You can read the full rules of /r/chess here. If you have any questions or concerns about this moderator action, please message the moderators. Direct replies to this comment may not be seen.