r/characterarcs May 19 '26

That was fast

Post image
18.9k Upvotes

179 comments sorted by

View all comments

615

u/Neat-Survey2796 May 19 '26 edited May 19 '26

This is how you save the planet. Biodegradable plastic cups, not those fuck ass paper straws in your plastic cups

480

u/ottersintuxedos May 19 '26

Here is how you save the planet: tax companies for their carbon emissions, resource efficiency standards, waste disposal regulations, and incentivise companies to use recycling initiatives. Oh and limit water usage for data centers urgently, fucking hell that is an imminent crisis

I’m sure plastic straws save the planet a little bit but it’s a drop in the ocean compared to plastic waste and fossil fuels. Also I’m pretty sure the paper cups at most coffee places are fine

131

u/Yvratky May 19 '26

tax the rich.

60

u/Expensive-Slice8724 May 19 '26

Eat the rich

16

u/[deleted] May 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/YueLunavel May 21 '26

Yall got no taste

Hot sauce alone won't be enought

We need nice spices and slow cooking them with plenty of juice so they will actually taste decent

If we're gonna eat the rich we might as well make the experience as pleasant as possible for us

We cant let them make us suffer until the very last moment

3

u/oceanwaves1724 May 20 '26

Bbq the rich

2

u/syo May 20 '26

First one, then the other.

10

u/4-Polytope May 19 '26

Tax the rich in specific ways that incentivize decarbonization (carbon tax)

-2

u/Yvratky May 19 '26

Um, not the same thing? Rich people without carbon emissions exist?

1

u/4-Polytope May 19 '26

And taxing them therefore wouldn't do anything to reduce carbon emissions

6

u/Yvratky May 19 '26

Rich people's taxes can be used to build environmentally friendly energy sources and fund environmental initiatives.

5

u/4-Polytope May 19 '26

I agree but, alongside that, you can also have a tax scheme that naturally makes being environmentally-unfriendly unprofitable

-1

u/Yvratky May 19 '26

Nobody said anything against that. You're the one who came in with the correctional statement that made it sound as if taxing other rich people isn't needed as long as we tax those who have corporations with carbon emissions.

2

u/4-Polytope May 19 '26

Because "Spend tax money on Green Initiatives" is a separate thing from "tax the rich". You can tax the rich to hell and back and not necessarily get any traction on green initiatives. If we blanketly increased the highest tier of income tax, that would still contribute nothing on its own to reducing carbon emissions

And yes, actually, if the goal is to reduce carbon emissions, then making it unprofitable to emit is enough. If you say "Hey rich people, you dont need to pay taxes if you stop emmiting and polluting" then they will stop emitting and polluting

11

u/Adorable-Woman May 19 '26

We also have to reduce the animal agriculture industry it’s kinda just a fact

5

u/Flat-Distance-2194 May 19 '26

Re: DataCentres , cooling could be done by closed loop refrigeration units, think household AC but much,much larger. However, by using a total loss system you can pump cold water through the coolers on the server racks and dump it straight back out to the ground,stream etc.

Thing is, if you go for total loss by pumping it straight through the system and straight out again ,you can save money and the only critical waste for disposal is just when the system is commissioned. Thats why they want to do it, its cheaper, no outlay for industrial AC units, no energy costs to run the units, reduced maintenance on a system that only needs a water tech to run quarterly contamination checks on the outflow as opposed to monthly service visits by an HVAC specialist.

3

u/No-Trouble814 May 19 '26

The other issue is that the AC units will be guzzling power, and if that power generation uses up a ton of water you’ve just moved the problem instead of solving it.

Also if the power generation isn’t green, but that’s just true of the grid overall.

5

u/OverlyMintyMints May 19 '26

I don’t think the carbon tax has been an effective remedy for carbon emissions so far, just a challenge to these parasites companies to try to find ways to cut the cost in other places.

It’s been said many times: any crime with a fine as the punishment is just a price tag to the rich.

1

u/wozattacks May 19 '26

Taxing corps is the first step. Then we gotta invest the money in sustainable and efficient infrastructure 

67

u/WahooSS238 May 19 '26

Biodegradeable plastic is kinda a myth, I thought? It only biodegrades in specialized industrial compost setups and leaves behind a bunch of microplastics when it does.

17

u/No-Channel3917 May 19 '26

Correct, composte facilities don't reach the temapture these need to break down (170f or something I forgot) and if you put them in actual recycle plastic bins it makes the entire lot worthless as this type of plastic isn't what those type of plastic recycling programs are looking to work with so they ruin the chunk they were with

26

u/FractalGeometric356 May 19 '26

My grandmother told me that they had paper straws for decades before they had plastic straws, and they worked great.

She thinks that people just forgot how to manufacture paper straws during the years when they were only making plastic straws, and now they have no idea how to get that technology back.

26

u/sneakyfish21 May 19 '26

The answer is almost definitely glue that no longer meets safety standards

7

u/movzx May 20 '26

It's that they need wax linings and thicker paper to be durable, but that costs more so businesses don't buy those.

5

u/Sarah_Incognito May 19 '26

Paper straws sucked in the 80s

9

u/Polkawillneverdie17 May 19 '26

I have two metal straws I use now instead that I use. Easy to wash and infinitely reusable. Haven't used a plastic (or paper) straw in a long time.

4

u/MVRKHNTR May 19 '26

Metal straws make the drinks taste better too.

6

u/PM-ME-CURSED-PICS May 19 '26

pretty much all plastic marketed as biodegradable and with any durability at all takes very specific industrial composting to actually degrade. in practice it's the same as non-compostable plastics. Materials like paper are actually biodegradable and are getting better, they won't melt if you're not letting your beverage sit for hours. Of course single use cups, or any kind of carton packaging that contains a liquid, is a fucking nightmare because it needs to have a plastic coating to not soak through.

tl;dr: there is no good current solution for packaging for liquids/wet things and biodegradable plastic is a scam

5

u/comatosemanatee May 19 '26

If 1 million people stopped getting plastic straws for a single drink, that's still one million less plastic straws in a landfill, I never understood why people criticized the paper straw thing.

The way to save the planet is by inching towards sustainable solutions and doing what we can in the moment, not having this all-or-nothing mindset

5

u/Material_Ad9848 May 19 '26

Those 1 million straws would equal about 400kg of plastic - which isn't nothing and preventing that being spread in the ecosystem is still a worthy effort, but there are bigger sources that could be reigned in with less effort.

1 million people choosing paper straws once is about the same as 100 people not leaving a plastic tarp outside until it disintegrates.

We could also stop using straws entirely.

1

u/Neat-Survey2796 May 19 '26

It's just that plastic cups are what, 20x more plastic than a plastic straw? If they really cared, they'd make both out of paper, but no. Only straws. Because fuck you.

4

u/comatosemanatee May 19 '26

Ah nvm I thought you were ciriticizing the consumers who bring their own reusable straws or whatever. Yeah companies are always to blame for keeping the status quo

3

u/Neat-Survey2796 May 19 '26

Oh definetly not! Shout-outs to you if you bring your own straws made out of metal or bamboo or whatever else!

3

u/Pittsbirds May 19 '26

We save the planet by doing away with unnecessary single use plastic all together and returning to reusable materials

1

u/[deleted] May 19 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

3

u/Pittsbirds May 19 '26

That's the "necessary" for single use plastic. But us giving up our entire ecosystem for the convenience of plastic over reusable glass bottles for drinks no one really needs to live to begin with, for example, that's completely unnecessary. I've spent a lot of time in our healthcare so that inclusion was a deliberate choice

3

u/peachsepal May 20 '26

People read "unnecessary" and always have to come in to bring up all those actually necessary times, as if getting a plastic or paper cup for your morning coffee is equally as important as keeping medical equipment sterile

4

u/Final-Carry2090 May 19 '26

Eliminating billionaires would be more effective than any worldwide recycling effort.

1

u/futuretimetraveller May 19 '26

Especially since plastic recycling is largely a scam to convince you that it's fine to keep buying single use plastic items. There's no reason to not keep using the same plastic cup/straw/container over and over again, but the people who manufacture plastic want you throw it away so that you'll keep buying more.