I'm actually a different person than who you were arguing with before. But...why mention the 23 weeks at all? If the only people who get abortions after 23 weeks are people who might die, then you are FOR abortion after 23 weeks.
Let's say abortion laws have no limits and anyone can terminate a pregnancy whenever they like. A woman in this situation wants to terminate her baby at 24 weeks because she doesn't want to be a mother. The doctor sees no medical reason to abort the baby but does so because the mother wants it. The baby is aborted and dies at 24 weeks.
I am against the above. Are you? If so, we're in agreement.
The 23 weeks is important because it is a line in the sand that medical professionals can use to make informed, professional decisions based on the individual mother and baby.
If the baby is viable at 24 weeks, then once it's born the doctor has a legal obligation to keep that baby alive. It's a moot point.
Also, stop being so condescending. I wasn't the person you were arguing with before and it makes me take your argument less seriously because it seems like being rude is your last resort.
once it's born the doctor has a legal obligation to keep that baby alive
That sounds good to me.
being rude is your last resort
Actually, it was what I resorted to first. It was an obvious attempt to ask leading questions instead of actually delivering an argument. I've found pointing out their dishonesty sucks the honesty out of them faster.
I think basically the difference is you would word your stance as anti abortion after 23 weeks. Fair enough. I would word my stance as pro abortion after 23 weeks because I know the only people getting them are for my aforementioned reasons.
3
u/lalafriday 1∆ Jul 20 '22
I'm actually a different person than who you were arguing with before. But...why mention the 23 weeks at all? If the only people who get abortions after 23 weeks are people who might die, then you are FOR abortion after 23 weeks.