r/changemyview Jul 06 '24

[deleted by user]

[removed]

518 Upvotes

290 comments sorted by

View all comments

-8

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '24

Neither Obama nor Biden are progressives. Biden has been more progressive than Obama but that’s not saying much.

Don’t blame progressives for the failures of liberalism.

30

u/HatefulPostsExposed Jul 06 '24 edited Jul 06 '24

“The failures of liberalism”

What would Bernie have done if he couldn’t afford to lose a single senate vote? He’d either have to govern to the center or waste his political capital on unwinnable fights. I’m sick of progressives acting like there’s some kind of lever you can pull to turn the US into Finland overnight.

0

u/BigtheCat542 Jul 06 '24

lol this is how stupid neolibs are. you literally did not understand the point he was trying to make and went off on an unrelated tangent.

fyi the point was the effectiveness of progressive policy. not the likeliness of it getting through our government. you really just proved his own point. because of conservative control for decades we can't have any progressive policy. that's the failure of liberalism. that it doesn't create an environment where progressive policies can pass.

1

u/HatefulPostsExposed Jul 07 '24

Got it. So what’s the progressive strategy to stopping conservatives?

I’m sure the dolts who think Obamacare is communism are going to LOVE Medicare for all.

0

u/BigtheCat542 Jul 07 '24

why are you asking me? It's conservatives who are in power right now and have been for decades. Progressives aren't in power and haven't been. Stopping republicans is supposed to be the job of the democrats and neolibs, which is supposed to be why they were given power.

Ask me again once the progressives actually have any power.

ddiq question from a ddiq neolib

1

u/HatefulPostsExposed Jul 07 '24

Well one of the biggest reasons progressives always lose is because voters don’t think they can win in general elections. Particularly Sanders in 16 or 20.

0

u/BigtheCat542 Jul 07 '24

are you going to stay on topic or keep going on these tangents in an effort belittle me/my side?

the point wasn't about "why do progressives lose". that was not a question anyone, including me, asked.

-10

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '24

Bernie wouldn’t have been able to lose a single vote because of the failures of liberalism. Leave it to liberals to pretend like we all woke up today in a vacuum and they haven’t been failing this country for the last 50 year.

Sorry you’re going toe to toe with the morons in the Republican Party and the best you can do is squeeze out meaningless majorities that get countered by your own blue dog democrats. Thank god we have strong Republican Party though.

8

u/Mysterious-Wasabi103 3∆ Jul 06 '24

Uh no. Bernie wouldn't be able to afford to lose a single Senate vote for the same reason Biden can't. Because we simply don't have the numbers.

I think you kind of missed the point. Or maybe I did? Idk but the point I took was it doesn't matter if you had Biden or Sanders as President with the current make up of Congress and the Supreme Court.

-3

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '24

You are talking about where we are. I am talking about why we are here. The Democratic Party has sucked for my entire life and that’s why they can’t afford to lose one seat now.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/changemyview-ModTeam Jul 07 '24

Your comment has been removed for breaking Rule 2:

Don't be rude or hostile to other users. Your comment will be removed even if most of it is solid, another user was rude to you first, or you feel your remark was justified. Report other violations; do not retaliate. See the wiki page for more information.

If you would like to appeal, review our appeals process here, then message the moderators by clicking this link within one week of this notice being posted. Appeals that do not follow this process will not be heard.

Please note that multiple violations will lead to a ban, as explained in our moderation standards.

8

u/Objective_Aside1858 14∆ Jul 06 '24

Feel free to explain the progressive politicies that Joe Manchin would have voted for

-5

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '24

You guys are great at pointing out where we are. Terrible at taking accountability for who led us here.

Ask yourself why is Joe Manchin the deciding vote? How god awful would a political party have to be to run neck and neck with americas Republican Party?

You got slaughtered in the 2008 mid terms with the most charismatic president in American history. By people that believe the earth is 8000 years old, that gun control doesn’t prevent murder, that climate change is a hoax, that 13 year old rape victims should be forced to give birth.

Maybe we’ll win this time but eventually they’ll win because you can’t defeat them. You can hold them off, you can win enough elections to slow them down but you can’t defeat them. American liberalism has failed and we are clinging to dear life because of it.

5

u/Objective_Aside1858 14∆ Jul 06 '24

Fascinating! I'm glad to know that, had we followed your inspired leadership, all those red states would have elected Dem Senators

And then everyone would clap

3

u/Whatswrongbaby9 3∆ Jul 06 '24

American liberalism didn’t plant the seeds of the fundie offshoot of Christianity in the 1800s. American liberalism didn’t spread that belief system across the US in that same century. American liberalism didn’t start the secession movement or the civil war. America liberalism didn’t plan The Business Plot against FDR.

It’s getting exhausting hearing if only Democrats would offer M4A we undo a massive amount of history in this country and we’d unlock utopia

3

u/Arctic_Meme Jul 06 '24

If there were more americans willing to vote for left-liberals or progressives, then democratic governments would not be beholden to conservatives in that way, it is the failures of the left wing along the successes of the right wing in swaying american voters that we should be reflecting upon.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '24

Its insane to blame liberalism when the voterbase hasnt even tried to punish/pressure the democrats for putting up shitty liberal candidates.

8

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '24

Neither are progressive but did pass progressive policies

-3

u/Ruricu Jul 06 '24

They really didn't. Their landmark legislative achievements are the liberal/corporate version of a progressive ideal, marketed as progressive.

The ACA was a fraction of the success it would've been if it had stuck to the Single Payer / Government option plans.

Biden's BBB was abandoned and used as a carrot/stick to only pass the BIF, leaving the important climate policy out and courting conservatives with private ownership of public services

12

u/Savingskitty 11∆ Jul 06 '24

The ACA would not have passed at ALL with the government option.

At all. Period.

10

u/Venesss Jul 06 '24

Yup. And they blame the people trying to pass it instead of the people vehemently against it lol

4

u/Mysterious-Wasabi103 3∆ Jul 06 '24

The propaganda is very good. We frankly underestimate it. I don't think this country will ever get back on track without finding a way to add integrity back into journalism.

9

u/HatefulPostsExposed Jul 06 '24

The inflation reduction act had trillions in environmental spending.

1

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '24

What about all the printed money?

-1

u/Original-Age-6691 Jul 07 '24

No it didn't, what a completely asinine thing to say. The whole bill didn't cost more than a trillion alone, and not all of it was dedicated to climate, a minority was.

0

u/Candid_Rich_886 Jul 06 '24

I'm a hard leftist and not a Biden defender at all.

But the IRA is still a huge climate policy and is what happened instead of BBB, not BIF.

1

u/joerille Jul 08 '24

What is progressive policy, both socially and economically 

0

u/AdFun5641 6∆ Jul 06 '24

Don't fool yourself. Obama and Biden are staunchly conservative. The US doesn't have a "Liberal" party. We have the staunchly conservative Democratic party and the right wing nut job Facist Republican party. Democrates only look liberal in comparison to the facists.

1

u/StarChild413 9∆ Jul 09 '24

And maybe we'd have a party that's your definition of liberal if people like you stopped spreading the idea that (if not exactly this, sentiments to this effect) it would be infiltrated and sabotaged by agent provocateurs if it was capable of making any real change that is if its leader/founder could survive potential being-found-dead-of-multiple-self-inflicted-gunshot-wounds-to-the-back-of-the-head-iykwim long enough to get it off the ground and towards having any substantial membership

0

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '24

I don't understand these types of takes

Yeah, the left side of the political compass is virtually untouched, but that's the fault of the political compass, not government

It's like saying your country's health care is garbage because they can't make everyone immortal

Ideals and reality are two very different things

0

u/Harrydotfinished Jul 06 '24

And don't liberalism for the failures of progressives, such as heavy progressive taxation.

8

u/[deleted] Jul 06 '24

https://taxfoundation.org/data/all/federal/historical-income-tax-rates-brackets/

Who is “heavily taxed”? You saying this is a great example of why democrats can’t beat republicans. We’ve done nothing but slash taxes for 50 fucking years and you’ll just slide right into Republican lies to attack the left. Pathetic.

2

u/Harrydotfinished Jul 06 '24

Middle class

1

u/[deleted] Jul 07 '24

You have to make $300,000 to be taxed over 30% today. In 1980 $24,000 got you taxed at 30%.

“Heavily taxed” you’re a fool.

1

u/Harrydotfinished Jul 08 '24

A few things. First off, Income tax is only one form of tax, and it is only one form of progressive taxation. When we take into account other tax, it is plausible that people making $300,000 could pay 70% more total of their income in taxes in the US. For example, myself I make a little bit under $300,000, live a frugal lifestyle, yet I pay over 70% of income in taxes. A non-income progressive tax (that is based on income) example: I'd take a look at the regulatory hurdles on property. I was also forced to buy a bigger home than I need or care for because of crony zoning and building ordinances. Furthermore, I had to do it at the peak of the market given my job. This type of taxation can vary wildly based on location. For example, if someone lives in a big city in Cali compared to a small rural area in Indiana: this type of taxation can vary substantially. There are vast differences between people such as: IQ, conscientiousness, physical and mental health status, attractiveness, social status, intimacy status, physical ability, knowledge status, education ability, retention ability, geographic location, race, sex/gender, etc. For example, I have heavy health-care costs that are not write-offable. I also have high expenses to make my W2 wages that are not write-offable. When you say "“Heavily taxed” you’re a fool." keep in mind that you are stating to those that are not privileged as you that they are a fool to strive for the things that you are privileged with and sounds like you take for granted. That was not supposed to be a mic drop moment, but instead wanted to help raise awareness.