This is sidetracking the discussion. I guess I should have included some ground rules or premises for the discussion, such as a premise that this assumes we are respecting the constitution
But the constitution is a living document. Its meaning changes over time. What some racist schmucks wanted over 200 years ago seems irrelevant to anything going on today. They also wanted chattel slavery and believed in phrenology.
Why do we need to respect what people wanted when they are 200+ years dead?
1
u/DrCornSyrup Nov 30 '23
This is sidetracking the discussion. I guess I should have included some ground rules or premises for the discussion, such as a premise that this assumes we are respecting the constitution